The refs shouldn't have had the chance to overturn it (deserves its own thread)

dnc

If Sark had half a brain, he hurries up and quick snaps that to ensure no chance at a review. Instead he substitutes, giving Stanford time to sub and the refs time to decide to review.

It's entirely on Sark.

TierbsHsotBoobs

If Sark had half a brain, UW would have been running the football to protect an 11 point lead in that point of the game.

It is entirely on Sark.

chrisvashon

dnc said:

If Sark had half a brain, he hurries up and quick snaps that to ensure no chance at a review. Instead he substitutes, giving Stanford time to sub and the refs time to decide to review.

It's entirely on Sark.

Many things are on Sark. Not this.

Had no reason to think the call was in doubt. Ref didn't hesitate to call it a catch.

dnc

chrisvashon said:

dnc said:

If Sark had half a brain, he hurries up and quick snaps that to ensure no chance at a review. Instead he substitutes, giving Stanford time to sub and the refs time to decide to review.

It's entirely on Sark.

Many things are on Sark. Not this.

Had no reason to think the call was in doubt. Ref didn't hesitate to call it a catch.

Dude I had plenty of doubt when the play happened. You can't take that chance on 4th and 10. Get up and snap the ball. We had all the momentum, and were about 10 yards from field goal range with plenty of time on the clock and a timeout. The only thing that could ruin it was an overturned call. You can't take that chance. Coaching 101.

dhdawg

if sark had a brain he wouldn't kicked short with 40 seconds left in the half setting up a TD

dnc

dhdawg said:

if sark had a brain he wouldn't kicked short with 40 seconds left in the half setting up a TD

We could fill a 53 page thread with "If Sark had a brain" observations. But since that overturned call is going to dominate the conversation, I think it's important to point out that Sark shouldn't have given them the chance.