Disagree ... we match up very well with the Tree ... 2.5 is a perfect number to jump on the Dawgs
Arizona was easy money too, right?
When you look back at all the things we did to fuck up the game and literally everything that could have gone right for Arizona, yes, covering a line of 10 or so when it came out should have been fairly easy. I wouldn't have touched the game at 14 because I was expecting a 3 score win and 14 starts getting into the range where the backdoor cover can get you.
There's no question in my mind that if this game was played 10 times, you're getting a cover at least 7 out of 10 times. But that's the inherent risk in sports betting is that you just never know.
Disagree ... we match up very well with the Tree ... 2.5 is a perfect number to jump on the Dawgs
Arizona was easy money too, right?
When you look back at all the things we did to fuck up the game and literally everything that could have gone right for Arizona, yes, covering a line of 10 or so when it came out should have been fairly easy. I wouldn't have touched the game at 14 because I was expecting a 3 score win and 14 starts getting into the range where the backdoor cover can get you.
There's no question in my mind that if this game was played 10 times, you're getting a cover at least 7 out of 10 times. But that's the inherent risk in sports betting is that you just never know.
Comments
Take Furd and the points. Easy money
There's no question in my mind that if this game was played 10 times, you're getting a cover at least 7 out of 10 times. But that's the inherent risk in sports betting is that you just never know.
maybe this will be chip's 'all i saw was purple' game but i dont know if the stanford QB1 does meth. i know hes not from spokane.
I guess you are smarter than the sharps. Strange that you aren't betting on Stanford though...