Huge win.
Comments
-
Especially if they had their starting tailback and QBpriapism said:If UW plays Arizona 10 times at UA this year, UW probably loses 2-3 of them. I'm happy with a win today.
-
Disagree. Most frustrating part of the game was watching Psalm.Tequilla said:
It was a hold but you have the plays in your hand to make and failed ... Vea needs to get the sack and the DBs can't lose the containment there to let a guy get behind them.priapism said:This game doesn't even go into OT if UA gets a holding penalty on that long pass completion by UA with I think 4 mins left. I watched football all day...that was the most flagrant hold I've seen today.
Honestly, that was the most frustrating part of tonight was that guys were playing outside of their responsibilities.
2nd most frustrating part of the game was the offense once they got inside Arizona's 30 yard line. Random play generator is still in use. -
The USC road win LAST YEAR was better, but still.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Arizona is not good but they're probably a 5 or 6 win team. It's not a bad road win. In fact, it's probably the best one since USC in 2010. I'll put the closeness on Van Winkle as much as anyone else. The conditions were dead calm wind, cancer turf...high 60s/low 70s...no excuse for missing both of those...
-
Fuck I hate late games. Hardly remember writing that. Skullfuck may have been too harsh. That's not how I really feel. Never happen again. K?
-
No way. USC with rock bottom and drunk Sark did everything they could to hand that game to us.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The USC road win LAST YEAR was better, but still.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Arizona is not good but they're probably a 5 or 6 win team. It's not a bad road win. In fact, it's probably the best one since USC in 2010. I'll put the closeness on Van Winkle as much as anyone else. The conditions were dead calm wind, cancer turf...high 60s/low 70s...no excuse for missing both of those...
Sark was chewing up 12 yards a carry and then got down to like the 20 and decided to air it out every play and that allowed us to stop them.
That was an absolute pathetic Sark meltdown. Maybe worse than the AC years ago. -
USC won the South last year. They had actual players on the field. They were terribly coached, but so was Arizona last night.CuntWaffle said:
No way. USC with rock bottom and drunk Sark did everything they could to hand that game to us.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The USC road win LAST YEAR was better, but still.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Arizona is not good but they're probably a 5 or 6 win team. It's not a bad road win. In fact, it's probably the best one since USC in 2010. I'll put the closeness on Van Winkle as much as anyone else. The conditions were dead calm wind, cancer turf...high 60s/low 70s...no excuse for missing both of those...
Sark was chewing up 12 yards a carry and then got down to like the 20 and decided to air it out every play and that allowed us to stop them.
That was an absolute pathetic Sark meltdown. Maybe worse than the AC years ago.
Arizona was the walking wounded and won't even make a bowl game. -
The Huskies had a clear edge in talent and multiple chances to salt the game away long before big play Dawkins singlehandedly closed the gap. Untimely INT's by Browning, dropped passes, missed FGs, uncharacteristically poor tackling at times and missed assignments led to giving up big plays, all of which changed the game from an easy win to an unnecessary nail biter.
So, this is not a huge win, just more incremental progress bullshit. The only worthy take away is that they didn't fold when things went south. They hung tough and ultimately won. If this win adds to their confidence while also getting their attention, then the incremental progress may be two steps forward, but that's squarely in the LIFPO arena.
-
Can I get a hug?theknowledge said:Fuck I hate late games. Hardly remember writing that. Skullfuck may have been too harsh. That's not how I really feel. Never happen again. K?
-
Oddly enough I was ok with the INT Browning threw because if the pass is incomplete our faggot kicker will miss the FG and give them better field position. At least the INT put them on the 1.Southerndawg said:
The Huskies had a clear edge in talent and multiple chances to salt the game away long before big play Dawkins singlehandedly closed the gap. Untimely INT's by Browning, dropped passes, missed FGs, uncharacteristically poor tackling at times and missed assignments led to giving up big plays, all of which changed the game from an easy win to an unnecessary nail biter.
So, this is not a huge win, just more incremental progress bullshit. The only worthy take away is that they didn't fold when things went south. They hung tough and ultimately won. If this win adds to their confidence while also getting their attention, then the incremental progress may be two steps forward, but that's squarely in the LIFPO arena. -
TommySQC said:
Can I get a reacharound?theknowledge said:Fuck I hate late games. Hardly remember writing that. Skullfuck may have been too harsh. That's not how I really feel. Never happen again. K?
