Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Guess Who?

Auburndawg
Auburndawg Member Posts: 362
in Hardcore Husky Board
"Spent some time with a coach last week we all highly respect.. He told me he has never seen a Stanford so athletic and so deep..

He said people will be surprised at how athletic they are when they see them against teams that are thought of as athletic.

He said he has had the time to watch them as he has been at home more. They are among the top 3-4 teams in the Pac-12 in terms of team speed.

Clearly he said they are the best Stanford team ever from a talent standpoint - he did say with a smile that they have to prove on the field."

Stanford is AWESOME. Can't possibly expect Sark to keep this one close!!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Auburn, pussy stinks. Thank you captain obvious! fuck!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,931
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Auburn, pussy stinks. Thank you captain obvious! fuck!

    Try fucking something other than Pac Ave hookers
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Auburn, pussy stinks. Thank you captain obvious! fuck!

    Try fucking something other than Pac Ave hookers
    Hey if we are going to start bashing on Pac Ave Hookers then I'm OUT!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Auburn, are you this fucking stupid?

    Bleenor is an epic douche but whatever coach he talked to last year was on point practically every game....predicted a blowout loss to UA, win over OSU and a tough game against WSU.

    Have you not watched Stanford the past two weeks? They are a clear top 5 team that is strong in every part of the game. They are better than they were last year at the end of the season. On paper, we are somewhat better than ASU. They were up 39-7 against ASU in the 3rd quarter before letting up. Last year's game doesn't mean shit. We don't have home field, they have a good qb now and they are much deeper at tailback.

    Take the star rankings and shove them up your fucking cunt. They don't mean shit. Is Sione Potoe' a 5 star anymore? What about the handful of guys who've flamed out or have transferred?

    This game will probably be the worst loss of the season. Its a much worse matchup than the zeroes. It's early but Stanford could be a legit NC contender. Frankly, if we somehow manage to lose by less than 10, that could show considerable progress (when reviewed at the end of the season).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Auburn, are you this fucking stupid?

    Bleenor is an epic douche but whatever coach he talked to last year was on point practically every game....predicted a blowout loss to UA, win over OSU and a tough game against WSU.

    Have you not watched Stanford the past two weeks? They are a clear top 5 team that is strong in every part of the game. They are better than they were last year at the end of the season. On paper, we are somewhat better than ASU. They were up 39-7 against ASU in the 3rd quarter before letting up. Last year's game doesn't mean shit. We don't have home field, they have a good qb now and they are much deeper at tailback.

    Take the star rankings and shove them up your fucking cunt. They don't mean shit. Is Sione Potoe' a 5 star anymore? What about the handful of guys who've flamed out or have transferred?

    This game will probably be the worst loss of the season. Its a much worse matchup than the zeroes. It's early but Stanford could be a legit NC contender. Frankly, if we somehow manage to lose by less than 10, that could show considerable progress (when reviewed at the end of the season).

    Disagree. We have some advantages on Stanford but we have none on Oregon. Plus both teams will be playing fast so Oregon game will be our worst blow out loss.

    To me "progress" isn't losing by 10 points. Progress is winning against good to great teams on the road.

    If we lose by let's say 10 to Stanford, 14 to Oregon, 3 to ASU, 7 to UCLA and 4 to Oregon State that isn't progress at all.

    If you want to be an elite program which we were for a long stretch eventually you have to win these type of games.

    Also Fleenor is full of shit. He isn't as important as he wants you guys to believe.

    As always I like Arizona in this one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Auburn, pussy stinks. Thank you captain obvious! fuck!

    Try fucking something other than Pac Ave hookers
    Hey if we are going to start bashing on Pac Ave Hookers then I'm OUT!
    Pac Ave or Pac Hwy?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,358 Founders Club
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Auburn, are you this fucking stupid?

    Bleenor is an epic douche but whatever coach he talked to last year was on point practically every game....predicted a blowout loss to UA, win over OSU and a tough game against WSU.

    Have you not watched Stanford the past two weeks? They are a clear top 5 team that is strong in every part of the game. They are better than they were last year at the end of the season. On paper, we are somewhat better than ASU. They were up 39-7 against ASU in the 3rd quarter before letting up. Last year's game doesn't mean shit. We don't have home field, they have a good qb now and they are much deeper at tailback.

    Take the star rankings and shove them up your fucking cunt. They don't mean shit. Is Sione Potoe' a 5 star anymore? What about the handful of guys who've flamed out or have transferred?

    This game will probably be the worst loss of the season. Its a much worse matchup than the zeroes. It's early but Stanford could be a legit NC contender. Frankly, if we somehow manage to lose by less than 10, that could show considerable progress (when reviewed at the end of the season).


    Ya, I think you're right about that. Stanford presents the worst matchup of the season for the Huskies, and they very well could be the best team the Huskies will face this season. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Stanford win the conference title again. I hope I'm wrong, but regardless of the final score, I'm expecting a beat down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,641
    What the fuck does Bleenor do? Why is he "connected" to all these coaches, NCAA personnel, etc.?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,777 Founders Club
    Uh wilcox sucks against the spread but is pretty good against the proset, I think we hold them under plunger levels of points but our offense gets exposed for the poser it is. Unless ASJ comes out of retirement and sankey gets 50 carries, we won't do much on O.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    brchco12 said:

    Uh wilcox sucks against the spread but is pretty good against the proset, I think we hold them under plunger levels of points but our offense gets exposed for the poser it is. Unless ASJ comes out of retirement and sankey gets 50 carries, we won't do much on O.

    Sark's offense always sucks against good defenses.

    Here are his offensive points against Stanford in four years.

    Year 1: 14 points
    Year 2: 0
    Year 3: 21
    Year 4: 17

    Against Oregon:

    Year 1: 19
    Year 2: 16
    Year 3: 17
    Year 4: 21

    Against USC:

    Year 1: 16
    Year 2: 32
    Year 3: 17
    Year 4: 14

    Sark despite being an "offensive genius" has struggled to score in these type of games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter