Home› College Football Forum

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Wilner: B12 and P12 will likely compete for 4th CFB playoff spot.

TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798
in College Football Forum
It's before early, but...
* If we assume the Pac-12 champion is not undefeated …

* And if we assume Alabama wins the SEC with fewer than two losses …

* And if we assume Florida State/Clemson wins the ACC with fewer than two losses …

* And if we assume Michigan State/Ohio State wins the Big Ten with fewer than two losses …

Then the Pac-12 champion could very well be competing with the Big 12 champion for the final playoff berth.

(Notre Dame and/or Houston might be involved, as well, but that’s for another time.)
Story. Seems a little far-fetched at this point that any P12 or B12 team other than Furd or Oklahomo could make a playoff game competitive.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Texas and Notre Dame aren't going to sniff the playoffs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    RoadDawg55 said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Texas and Notre Dame aren't going to sniff the playoffs.
    Doesnt necessarily mean THIS year. Means every year until we move to 6 or 8 teams. im more worried about next year. But if you think ND is out of playoff this year u b kinda dumb. Oh, also a little early to call anything in the big12.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Maybe you should dig up these posts of things you prophecized every once in awhile? Instead of waiting for something to happen to only jump in and go "see I told you this would happen"

    Oh wait it's because you didn't actually say any of those things.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Stanford kept Stanford out last year.

    But still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,342
    edited September 2016
    HuskyJW said:

    If Houston keeps winning the Pac 12 is f-ed

    Plagerism.shit.fucko
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,886
    It's really too early to tell ... Alabama's basically already assumed to be in but 4 of their 5 most difficult games are on the road.

    There's a good chance that this is the year of absolute carnage and drives home the all conference winners need to be in the playoff discussion.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    It's really too early to tell ... Alabama's basically already assumed to be in but 4 of their 5 most difficult games are on the road.

    There's a good chance that this is the year of absolute carnage and drives home the all conference winners need to be in the playoff discussion.

    Except one of the conference winners will probably be 9-4 because of a title game upset.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,434
    FremontTroll said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    image

    We have all the screenshots we need.
    Puppy's always right
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,886
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    It's really too early to tell ... Alabama's basically already assumed to be in but 4 of their 5 most difficult games are on the road.

    There's a good chance that this is the year of absolute carnage and drives home the all conference winners need to be in the playoff discussion.

    Except one of the conference winners will probably be 9-4 because of a title game upset.
    I don't care if a team is 9-4 ... I would rather the instance where that team is in and has to win 3 games versus the present scenario where a conference champ is arbitrarily chosen as being out and not given the chance on the field
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    It's really too early to tell ... Alabama's basically already assumed to be in but 4 of their 5 most difficult games are on the road.

    There's a good chance that this is the year of absolute carnage and drives home the all conference winners need to be in the playoff discussion.

    Except one of the conference winners will probably be 9-4 because of a title game upset.
    I don't care if a team is 9-4 ... I would rather the instance where that team is in and has to win 3 games versus the present scenario where a conference champ is arbitrarily chosen as being out and not given the chance on the field
    If you want all conference champs, you have to go to at least a 12 team playoff.

    I'm ok with that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    It's really too early to tell ... Alabama's basically already assumed to be in but 4 of their 5 most difficult games are on the road.

    There's a good chance that this is the year of absolute carnage and drives home the all conference winners need to be in the playoff discussion.

    Except one of the conference winners will probably be 9-4 because of a title game upset.
    I don't care if a team is 9-4 ... I would rather the instance where that team is in and has to win 3 games versus the present scenario where a conference champ is arbitrarily chosen as being out and not given the chance on the field
    If you want all conference champs, you have to go to at least a 12 team playoff.

    I'm ok with that.
    16 is the correct number. Every conference champ gets in, plus what, 5 at large teams. Seed them and play it out.

    The lower divisions get this right. Unfortunately the FBS is too tied to the dreckfest bowel system to do what's right. In that event, this is the best system. 8 fixes nothing IMO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,213
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Texas and Notre Dame aren't going to sniff the playoffs.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Jesus.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,886
    16 is too many IMO because it devalues the regular season. I'm not entirely sure about 12 for the same reasons.

    Here's how I see 8:

    5 conference winners = automatic bids
    1 non Power 5 = automatic bid
    2 at large bids --> covers any independents like Notre Dame assuming that they stay out of full fledge ACC membership

    You could argue that by keeping only 1 bid for the non-power 5 that that's limiting but you'd have very few instances IMO where you can make an argument for 2. It also will encourage top end non-power 5 teams to actually test themselves in the non-conference to increase their quality of schedule ... that's good for college football IMO. In the few instances where you do have two top end non power 5 teams (take the year that Boise and TCU played in the Fiesta Bowl), they will be covered by the remaining at large bids. Likwise, it will encourage teams to pay less attention to these shit non-conference games and instead focusing on increasing the quality of their opposition to help differentiate themselves.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Pup REPEATEDLY warned this would happen before playoff started. Specifically and repeatedly warned ND and Texas would keep UW out of playoff. Or Stanford as we've already seen. Someone saved Pup's prophecies. Quite frankly im brilliant. Playing out EXACTLY how I said it would.

    Texas and Notre Dame aren't going to sniff the playoffs.
    Doesnt necessarily mean THIS year. Means every year until we move to 6 or 8 teams. im more worried about next year. But if you think ND is out of playoff this year u b kinda dumb. Oh, also a little early to call anything in the big12.
    Notre Dame won't make the playoff. Hth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.