Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Preseason expectations?

GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
What, if anything (hi boobs), would make you happy? Beyond three blowouts with little to no injury issues, I would like to see multiple wide receivers and running backs emerge as potential playmakers. I'd also like to see Psalm usurped prior to Pac-12 play.
«1

Comments

  • DeepSeaZDeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    And Jonathan Smith fired
  • section_332section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    BearsWiin said:

    Losses to SDSU and Texas, with the team quitting on the coaching staff before conference play, TSIO in September, take a flamethrower to the staff offices and start over again, or just bulldoze the fucking stadium once and for all because the administration isn't committed to wiinning football FYFMFE

    Then UW would have to play at qwest feild.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Gladstone said:

    What, if anything (hi boobs), would make you happy? Beyond three blowouts with little to no injury issues, I would like to see multiple wide receivers and running backs emerge as potential playmakers. I'd also like to see Psalm usurped prior to Pac-12 play.

    Chinned for calling it preseason.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    BearsWiin said:

    Losses to SDSU and Texas, with the team quitting on the coaching staff before conference play, TSIO in September, take a flamethrower to the staff offices and start over again, or just bulldoze the fucking stadium once and for all because the administration isn't committed to wiinning football FYFMFE

    I know you are being sarcastic but UW plays Rutgers and Idaho.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,970
    Voted down for referencing WRs
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    BearsWiin said:

    Losses to SDSU and Texas, with the team quitting on the coaching staff before conference play, TSIO in September, take a flamethrower to the staff offices and start over again, or just bulldoze the fucking stadium once and for all because the administration isn't committed to wiinning football FYFMFE

    image
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Tequilla said:

    Voted down for referencing WRs

    ????????????
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    BearsWiin said:

    Losses to SDSU and Texas, with the team quitting on the coaching staff before conference play, TSIO in September, take a flamethrower to the staff offices and start over again, or just bulldoze the fucking stadium once and for all because the administration isn't committed to wiinning football FYFMFE

    SDSU is gonna kick the shit out of you, no joke. @Tequilla WAS RIGHT
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,970
    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Voted down for referencing WRs

    ????????????
    Multiple WRs emerge as playmakers
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Voted down for referencing WRs

    ????????????
    Multiple WRs emerge as playmakers
    what
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Voted down for referencing WRs

    ????????????
    Multiple WRs emerge as playmakers
    what
    lol wut
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,367
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Voted down for referencing WRs

    ????????????
    Multiple WRs emerge as playmakers
    In three words or less, you'd prefer none? One?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    Run the football

    YBE
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,970
    Expanded reason why I flagged for the WR comment:

    We're playing 3 shit teams in the preseason with Rutgers likely being the best competition. The playbook should be fairly vanilla in these games focusing on the run, getting out of the games healthy and with wins.

    In 2 of the 3 games, we're playing schools where athletically we will have significant advantages. Even if we do throw the ball all over the place, we shouldn't be expecting to learn much from the passing game and certainly at that point we shouldn't be expecting any performance from any of those players to qualify as breakouts. The closest thing we'll be able to get to a breakout is if there's some sign of diversification of John Ross's route tree.

    We won't begin to know what we have in the passing game until the first 3 conference games and even then what I expect is that you'll find the passing game spread out across multiple players. The biggest difference versus last year is that Ross will pull off 4-6 plays this season where he produces quick points just because of his abilities .. something that wasn't in play last year. In a game against an Oregon or Stanford, Ross having the ability to get an easy score may be the difference in the game.
  • ExtraChrisBExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,811
    edited August 2016
    Tequilla said:

    Expanded reason why I flagged for the WR comment:

    We're playing 3 shit teams in the preseason with Rutgers likely being the best competition. The playbook should be fairly vanilla in these games focusing on the run, getting out of the games healthy and with wins.

    In 2 of the 3 games, we're playing schools where athletically we will have significant advantages. Even if we do throw the ball all over the place, we shouldn't be expecting to learn much from the passing game and certainly at that point we shouldn't be expecting any performance from any of those players to qualify as breakouts. The closest thing we'll be able to get to a breakout is if there's some sign of diversification of John Ross's route tree.

    We won't begin to know what we have in the passing game until the first 3 conference games and even then what I expect is that you'll find the passing game spread out across multiple players. The biggest difference versus last year is that Ross will pull off 4-6 plays this season where he produces quick points just because of his abilities .. something that wasn't in play last year. In a game against an Oregon or Stanford, Ross having the ability to get an easy score may be the difference in the game.

    You just couldn't contain yourself after 3 straight one sentence posts.

    Disagree. Myles Gaskin broke out against Sac State last year. Yeah, he still had to prove it against real competition, which he did, but he broke out in the Sac State game. An Aaron Fuller or Andre Baccellia going off in the preseason wouldn't be meaningless.
Sign In or Register to comment.