Saban

Fire_Marshall_Bill

He was DC under Belichick for the original Browns in the early 90s. Then Belichick got...FIRED. Believe it or not millenials. Then after taking the job at Michigan St, they were very ordinary from 1995-1998. I don't think they were ever better than 7-5 and we killed them in an Aloha Bowel.

In 1999, Spartans went 10-2 and beat a SEC team in a Citrus Bowl or something.

Since then, he has done things everywhere except Miami.

I don't know what my point is, except sometimes a little patience is needed.

PurpleJ

I believe it when I see it. 4-5 fucking soft Pac-12 loser until proven otherwise.

Sources

Part of it is Saban maturing as a coach. Part of it is him being at a program that gives a shit.

We do not give a shit:
1) Our AD is a fat pile of shit and is allegedly a woman
2) Ticket sales stagnate and we call it a success (we also provide artificially inflated numbers)
3) We're incapable of holding coaches accountable (see: Ty, Sark, Romar, Smiff)
4) Our mascot is a raccoon with down syndrome.
5) 4-5 is "promising"

We're fucked.

That being said, I've always been willing to give Pete 3 years. Seems to be the typical benchmark for success. I hope he proves to be a solid hire, but him retaining Smiff and his gameday coaching are troubling. I greatly fear Pete will settle in at 7-9 wins every year and UW fans will complacently rejoice at our annual mediocrity. #BuiltFuckedForLife

BearsWiin

He started taking steroids

PurpleJ

Arguments doogs make for $75k....

PurpleJ

Sources said:

Part of it is Saban maturing as a coach. Part of it is him being at a program that gives a shit.

We do not give a shit:
1) Our AD is a fat pile of shit and is allegedly a woman
2) Ticket sales stagnate and we call it a success (we also provide artificially inflated numbers)
3) We're incapable of holding coaches accountable (see: Ty, Sark, Romar, Smiff)
4) Our mascot is a raccoon with down syndrome.
5) 4-5 is "promising"

We're fucked.

That being said, I've always been willing to give Pete 3 years. Seems to be the typical benchmark for success. I hope he proves to be a solid hire, but him retaining Smiff and his gameday coaching are troubling. I greatly fear Pete will settle in at 7-9 wins every year and UW fans will complacently rejoice at our annual mediocrity. #BuiltFuckedForLife

Our only hope is #StadiumDefault. Hi Tequila!

RaceBannon

WTF for not calling him Nick Satan

Get your game up FMB

PurpleJ

Belicheat! ROFLTFLMAO!!!!!!1

rodmansrage

SABAN SPOTTED AT SEATAC!!!!

STAFF!!!! TRUE??!?!?!?!!?!?

RaceBannon

PurpleJ said:

Arguments doogs make for $75k....

So you would have fired Nick Saban. Got it

Baseman

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

He was DC under Belichick for the original Browns in the early 90s. Then Belichick got...FIRED. Believe it or not millenials. Then after taking the job at Michigan St, they were very ordinary from 1995-1998. I don't think they were ever better than 7-5 and we killed them in an Aloha Bowel.

In 1999, Spartans went 10-2 and beat a SEC team in a Citrus Bowl or something.

Since then, he has done things everywhere except Miami.

I don't know what my point is, except sometimes a little patience is needed.

For your sake, I hope Pumpy returns soon.

PurpleJ

RaceBannon said:

PurpleJ said:

Arguments doogs make for $75k....

So you would have fired Nick Saban. Got it

And Don James!

allpurpleallgold

I don't believe the win now or else mentality most of us have is based in reality. I believe it is more of a response to the many years of excuses we've heard from doogs defending bad coaches.

We don't know what Michigan State was like during Sabans time. We know the Big 10 was a strong conference. I looked at schedule results and Saban beat a top 10 team every year but once while there. He also had some bad losses. But looking back at a mediocre record doesn't tell us what the team looked like.

The truth is Sark could have had the same record and been a really good coach. The problem is doogs think this means they can excuse all his flaws and fuck ups because we would have fired Don James and Nick Saban.

There can be room to judge a coach between the wins and losses. But at the University of Washington that room is gone.

TierbsHsotBoobs

allpurpleallgold said:

I don't believe the win now or else mentality most of us have is based in reality. I believe it is more of a response to the many years of excuses we've heard from doogs defending bad coaches.

We don't know what Michigan State was like during Sabans time. We know the Big 10 was a strong conference. I looked at schedule results and Saban beat a top 10 team every year but once while there. He also had some bad losses. But looking back at a mediocre record doesn't tell us what the team looked like.

The truth is Sark could have had the same record and been a really good coach. The problem is doogs think this means they can excuse all his flaws and fuck ups because we would have fired Don James and Nick Saban.

There can be room to judge a coach between the wins and losses. But at the University of Washington that room is gone.

Did you mix coffee with bong water today?

allpurpleallgold

Stick to defending Hillary.

TierbsHsotBoobs

allpurpleallgold said:

Stick to defending Hillary.

I'm not the one claiming Sark could have been a really good coach.

doogsinparadise

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

Stick to defending Hillary.

I'm not the one claiming Sark could have been a really good coach.

Christ dude, drink your coffee.