going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)
That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.
Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.
Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
Presented with comment:
Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.
Natty appearance or gtfo.
We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.
You don't know when to quit.
Making the playoffs and winning a semifinal >>> anything Shaw has done.
You fags sound like iDawg saying Riley > Carroll.
Riley never had a better record than Carroll
Valid poont.
Shaw looks great because Stanford. All black coaches there look great.
I have been on the bash Shaw bandwagon but 5 years is 5 years. The style and the power is appealing. Don James, who we would have fired, fucked up games every year until 1991 while winning Rose Bowls and being a dominant Pac 10 player.
I'd take Shaw at this point because we? would never hire Urban or Nick or anyone like them
Comments
(NT)
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan
Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
See the Tug
NDSU is the best team this decade if quality of opponent doesn't matter.
Is this the line to bleaux Shaw?
Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.
Natty appearance or gtfo.
You fags sound like iDawg saying Riley > Carroll.
Shaw looks great because Stanford. All black coaches there look great.
I'd take Shaw at this point because we? would never hire Urban or Nick or anyone like them