Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Presented w/o comment.....

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Boobs hates facts

    See the Tug

    I openly admit that Stanford is a dwarf among midgets.

    NDSU is the best team this decade if quality of opponent doesn't matter.
    When it takes multiple poasts to explain your shit arguement you're a shit poaster.
    Doogs are slow and need to be spoon fed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Gladstone said:

    I wonder if boobs knows how dumb he looks and just goes with it or he's oblivious

    Stanford beat the fourth best B1G team in the Rose Bowl.

    Is this the line to bleaux Shaw?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    salemcoog said:

    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.

    You don't know when to quit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.

    You don't know when to quit.
    Making the playoffs and winning a semifinal >>> anything Shaw has done.

    You fags sound like iDawg saying Riley > Carroll.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.

    You don't know when to quit.
    Making the playoffs and winning a semifinal >>> anything Shaw has done.

    You fags sound like iDawg saying Riley > Carroll.
    Riley never had a better record than Carroll
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.

    You don't know when to quit.
    Making the playoffs and winning a semifinal >>> anything Shaw has done.

    You fags sound like iDawg saying Riley > Carroll.
    Riley never had a better record than Carroll
    Valid poont.

    Shaw looks great because Stanford. All black coaches there look great.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    11) Colorado. While Liufau may turn out to be a Qb. I'm not sure Embr

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Baseman said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
    Presented with comment:

    Sounds like Boobs went full Quook.

    Natty appearance or gtfo.

    We think Helfrich sucks but he's done more with the program he inherited than Shaw has.

    You don't know when to quit.
    Making the playoffs and winning a semifinal >>> anything Shaw has done.

    You fags sound like iDawg saying Riley > Carroll.
    Riley never had a better record than Carroll
    Valid poont.

    Shaw looks great because Stanford. All black coaches there look great.
    I have been on the bash Shaw bandwagon but 5 years is 5 years. The style and the power is appealing. Don James, who we would have fired, fucked up games every year until 1991 while winning Rose Bowls and being a dominant Pac 10 player.

    I'd take Shaw at this point because we? would never hire Urban or Nick or anyone like them
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter