Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Obama paid $400 million ransom to Iran

HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874

Wooden pallets stacked with euros, Swiss francs and other currencies were flown into Iran on an unmarked cargo plane, according to these officials. The U.S. procured the money from the central banks of the Netherlands and Switzerland, they said.

No clue how, but I'm sure a bunch of you lemmings are going to defend this and say Hillary will be better.
«134

Comments

  • Options
    BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,341
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Great paywall link, as always.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    edited August 2016
    TheGlove said:

    Great paywall link, as always.

    Its a filter for slow folks...but I'll help you out. Click the first link:

    https://google.com/#q=us+sent+cash+to+iran+as+americans+were+freed
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,822
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • Options
    doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    What, he didn't sell them guns? Total amateur.
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Did Iran funnel any of the money to rebels fighting in central america?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,822
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    What, he didn't sell them guns? Total amateur.

    He gave them a nuke

    Always picking on the Black guy
  • Options
    GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,147
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Odd move for an administration that has been pretty outspoken about the fact that they will never create a market for American hostages by paying out ransoms.
  • Options
    BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,341
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Diplomacy, foreign relations. I'm sure Trumpf would have cut a much better deal using hid flawless business acumen.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    TheGlove said:

    Diplomacy, foreign relations. I'm sure Trumpf would have cut a much better deal using hid flawless business acumen.

    What, again, does Trump have to do with the current President paying a bribe to a state sponsor of terrorism to release US hostages (and hiding this from the American people)?

    image
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper

    TheGlove said:

    Diplomacy, foreign relations. I'm sure Trumpf would have cut a much better deal using hid flawless business acumen.

    What, again, does Trump have to do with the current President paying a bribe to a state sponsor of terrorism to release US hostages (and hiding this from the American people)?

    image
    I like to live in a country that has been sponsoring terror since at least 1910, and then act like an ignorant hypocrite about states that sponsor terror, while also belonging to a party whose biggest hero in the last 50 years did the exact same thing.
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper


    Not true on many levels, but thanks again for being a lemming and trying to excuse it. And no, Reagan did not pay a bribe to release hostages...but thank you for playing.

    How fucking stupid are you? And you try to claim you finished high school?

    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
    LULZ LULZ
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    Says the guy who apparently believes in the "October Surprise Conspiracy Theory"?

    Only thing missing is...well...evidence...such as the WSJ documenting how pallets of cash were being flown to Iran in undocumented flights.

    But keep spinning the conspiracy theories...
  • Options
    OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited August 2016
    Read up on Iran Contra. Reagan gave them arms. Which was a bribe. To get hostages from Lebanon.

    He admitted it. After he tried to keep it a secret but was caught.

    The October surprise was an entirely different incident.
  • Options
    sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    5 Awesomes Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,095
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes

    Odd move for an administration that has been pretty outspoken about the fact that they will never create a market for American hostages by paying out ransoms.

    Yeah I guess 5 top terrorists aren't money..........
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    OZONE said:

    Read up on Iran Contra. Reagan gave them arms. Which was a bribe. To get hostages from Lebanon.

    He admitted it. After he tried to keep it a secret but was caught.

    The October surprise was an entirely different incident.

    No, that administration didn't. They sold them arms. Still bad (and a whole separate foreign policy discussion...just ask Hillary and her involvement with folks like Pinchuk and Ericcson AB and now Lefarge who was working with ISIS), but that is still a BIG, BIG difference from sending pallets of unmarked currency over for hostages.

    You really are bad at this.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,095
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes

    OZONE said:

    Read up on Iran Contra. Reagan gave them arms. Which was a bribe. To get hostages from Lebanon.

    He admitted it. After he tried to keep it a secret but was caught.

    The October surprise was an entirely different incident.

    No, that administration didn't. They sold them arms. Still bad (and a whole separate foreign policy discussion...just ask Hillary and her involvement with folks like Pinchuk and Ericcson AB and now Lefarge who was working with ISIS), but that is still a BIG, BIG difference from sending pallets of unmarked currency over for hostages.

    You really are bad at this.
    Well we had Ambassador Stephens do our arms smuggling. He sent weapons into Syria via an Al Qaeda operative to anti Assad rebels who turned out to be ISIS. Oh and then let them all get killed. No witnesses..........
Sign In or Register to comment.