Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump's latest affair

24

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.

    This was a common refrain against the war and still is used to say why it was a mistake.

    So because Trump said it you're going to act like it is some big deal?

    Christ, it was wrong then and wrong now.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,059 Founders Club

    Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.

    This was a common refrain against the war and still is used to say why it was a mistake.

    So because Trump said it you're going to act like it is some big deal?

    Christ, it was wrong then and wrong now.
    It was the backbone of the anti war movement

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Disagree, but sure.gif.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.

    This was a common refrain against the war and still is used to say why it was a mistake.

    So because Trump said it you're going to act like it is some big deal?

    Christ, it was wrong then and wrong now.
    It was the backbone of the anti war movement

    No. It wasn't.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    edited July 2016
    "No blood for oil" and "9-11 was an inside job" were the rallying cry of the hipster Gen X douchebags. I don't recall anyone making intelligent arguments about creating a power vacuum.

    I think Hills should run on her vote and strong support for the Iraq War while in the Senate and subsequent overseeing of our pullout and the rise of ISIS while as Sec. of State. Should work for her...

    Why run on the issues when the media will assassinate your opponent's character before the debates even start?
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.

    Is it the dementia or are you just trolling?
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    TheGlove said:

    Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.

    Is it the dementia or are you just trolling?
    Abundance
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,059 Founders Club
    TheGlove said:

    Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.

    Is it the dementia or are you just trolling?
    image
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,059 Founders Club
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,059 Founders Club
    But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.
    FO,G