More Republicans are getting on the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump bandwagon

OZONE

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/02/politics/republican-women-organize-to-support-clinton/index.html

When is the last time so many visible members of one party supported the candidate from the other party?

PurpleJ

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Tequilla

So you are saying the established are backing the establishment candidate?

Not surprising

OZONE

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

OZONE

Tequilla said:

So you are saying the established are backing the establishment candidate?

It is a bit more profound.

They are backing the candidate from the OTHER party.

PurpleJ

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

OZONE

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.

This piece sheds some light on turnout http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/08/so-far-turnout-in-this-years-primaries-rivals-2008-record/

HoustonHusky

OZONE...the Clinton lapdog...there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump, and you and CNN are worried about these 5 ladies. Love this part as well...

Her temporary transition to Democratic volunteer might seem all too convenient at first: She was recently married to Tim Lim, the founder of a media buying firm called Precision and a partner at Bully Pulpit Interactive, which has a contract with the Clinton campaign.

EwaDawg

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

Smart democrats voted republican in the primaries. And they didn't vote for the fucking moron Trump.

OZONE

HoustonHusky said:

there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump

Who published these estimates you refer to?

SweatpantsGeneral

EwaDawg said:

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

Smart democrats voted republican in the primaries. And they didn't vote for the fucking moron Trump.

Lol. You said "smart Democrats"... cute.

HoustonHusky

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.

So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.

Arf....arf...

OZONE

HoustonHusky said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.

So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.

Arf....arf...

I didn't realize you were this stupid.

Not that I bothered paying attention to you before.

The math depends on the methodology, and what is and isn't included in the denominator and numerator for the equation.

You might learn that if you ever make it to college. But you sound like a typical blue collar Trump support. Dropped out in the 9th grade?

HoustonHusky

OZONE said:

HoustonHusky said:

there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump

Who published these estimates you refer to?

One of many...

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows

Arf...arf...away. Keep lapping up the Clinton propaganda.

OZONE

HoustonHusky said:

OZONE said:

HoustonHusky said:

there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump

Who published these estimates you refer to?

One of many...

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows

Welome to January. A lot has changed.

HoustonHusky

OZONE said:

HoustonHusky said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.

So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.

Arf....arf...

I didn't realize you were this stupid.

Not that I bothered paying attention to you before.

The math depends on the methodology, and what is and isn't included in the denominator and numerator for the equation.

You might learn that if you ever make it to college. But you sound like a typical blue collar Trump support. Dropped out in the 9th grade?

I've got an education you could only dream of getting...but keep telling yourself whatever you need to sleep at night.

HoustonHusky

OZONE said:

HoustonHusky said:

OZONE said:

HoustonHusky said:

there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump

Who published these estimates you refer to?

One of many...

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows

Welome to January. A lot has changed.

Yup. Since then over 100,000 crossed party lines in Pennsylvania alone to vote Trump in the primary. Go read Van Jones' take on it.

Keep lapping up the Clinton Kool Aide...arf...arf...

2001400ex

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

WWE has the highest pay per view revenue.

Welcome to this week's meaningless stats.

topdawgnc

The GOP establishment wants Hillary to win.

She is money in the bank.

HoustonHusky

True. Funny too how this CNN article with no stats or anything magically shows up on the same day Hills gets her FBI interview. All for lemmings like OZONE to try and propogate/diffuse the news of the day.

sarktastic

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

OZONE said:

PurpleJ said:

Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?

Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.

So why were Democratic primary numbers down?

I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.

This piece sheds some light on turnout http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/08/so-far-turnout-in-this-years-primaries-rivals-2008-record/

They were votes.

Methodology used was counting.

It went something like this... One, two, three, four, five, six, etc.

Still confused?