Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Woof

2

Comments

  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792

    Gladstone said:

    #BrowningSirmonBuffer

    This is FS. Browning and Sirmon are three years apart and of course Browning didn't redshirt. So they may not even overlap at all.

    We need to hit on our QB this year. Relying on the freshman Messiah to come in and save the day is not a reliable strategy.
    I agree with you, but browning will be here through the 2018 season.

    Sirmon will get on campus in January of 2018, redshirt that year and be ready hopefully as a RS-frosh in 2019.

    Like I said, I agree that this QB recruiting stuff is bullshit but it's not like we'd have a true frosh we need to rely on.
    Browning staying and Sirmon making it to campus are both more likely than not but neither is 100% certain either.
    If anything, this commitment gives Sirmon even more reason to come here since the starting job should be his pretty early on. Bridge-Gadd and Haener are now just insurance policies.
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798
    The '17 QB was always going to be an ins policy. DBG will be decent, and will nicely bridge Browning to Sirmon. Recruits watch each other, look at depth charts, want early PT. There are better indictments of Smith than this recruiting cycle.
  • unfrozencavemanunfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    I actually like this guy. Insurance policy yes, but you never know
  • DeepSeaZDeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    None of this matters unless we win big this year.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited June 2016
    chuck said:

    Some people are a little too caught up in stars and offers. Watch the film. He's not an NFL prospect (small), but he's mobile, has a solid arm, solid mechanics, and looks pretty fucking good all around. Guys like this can tear it up in college. I don't give a fuck if we never recruit another NFL QB as long as he finds someone that can throw the ball to the guys in black and lavender and khaki and white.

    One thing I like about his film over almost all HS QB films I've seen is how often he throws the ball hard. Too much touch pass shit going on in most QB films. Most any hack can throw it up for wide open receivers to run under, or swerve to, or stop for etc. All those lobs don't tell you if they have the knack for hitting a guy in stride when the defense forces you to throw hard.

    Great thanks for the scouting report.

    If Smith stumbled into a diamond in the rough again this year then great.

    The concern is that this makes two years in a row that Smith had no discernible plan for recruiting the QB position and offered and missed on nearly every big prospect on the west coast.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited June 2016
    TTJ said:

    The '17 QB was always going to be an ins policy. DBG will be decent, and will nicely bridge Browning to Sirmon. Recruits watch each other, look at depth charts, want early PT. There are better indictments of Smith than this recruiting cycle.

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774

    I don't actually care about how good the kid is, I just want Smith fired

    Interesting that this offer went out while Tedford was in town ....
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,057 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    Some people are a little too caught up in stars and offers. Watch the film. He's not an NFL prospect (small), but he's mobile, has a solid arm, solid mechanics, and looks pretty fucking good all around. Guys like this can tear it up in college. I don't give a fuck if we never recruit another NFL QB as long as he finds someone that can throw the ball to the guys in black and lavender and khaki and white.

    One thing I like about his film over almost all HS QB films I've seen is how often he throws the ball hard. Too much touch pass shit going on in most QB films. Most any hack can throw it up for wide open receivers to run under, or swerve to, or stop for etc. All those lobs don't tell you if they have the knack for hitting a guy in stride when the defense forces you to throw hard.

    Great thanks for the scouting report.

    If Smith stumbled into a diamond in the rough again this year then great.

    The concern is that this makes two years in a row that Smith had no discernible plan for recruiting the QB position and offered and missed on nearly every big prospect on the west coast.
    Fuck you it wasn't a scouting report. Just my quick assessment and an attempt at objectivity to temper the uproar that occurs every time someone that USC didn't offer commits to UW.

    But you're absolutely right about Smith. No argument from me there. He's a liability in every aspect.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited June 2016
    chuck said:

    chuck said:

    Some people are a little too caught up in stars and offers. Watch the film. He's not an NFL prospect (small), but he's mobile, has a solid arm, solid mechanics, and looks pretty fucking good all around. Guys like this can tear it up in college. I don't give a fuck if we never recruit another NFL QB as long as he finds someone that can throw the ball to the guys in black and lavender and khaki and white.

    One thing I like about his film over almost all HS QB films I've seen is how often he throws the ball hard. Too much touch pass shit going on in most QB films. Most any hack can throw it up for wide open receivers to run under, or swerve to, or stop for etc. All those lobs don't tell you if they have the knack for hitting a guy in stride when the defense forces you to throw hard.

    Great thanks for the scouting report.

    If Smith stumbled into a diamond in the rough again this year then great.

    The concern is that this makes two years in a row that Smith had no discernible plan for recruiting the QB position and offered and missed on nearly every big prospect on the west coast.
    Fuck you it wasn't a scouting report. Just my quick assessment and an attempt at objectivity to temper the uproar that occurs every time someone that USC didn't offer commits to UW.

    But you're absolutely right about Smith. No argument from me there. He's a liability in every aspect.
    Didn't mean to be in sarcasm mode sorry chuck. Your observations are appreciated.
  • AEBAEB Member Posts: 2,972
    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,057 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    chuck said:

    Some people are a little too caught up in stars and offers. Watch the film. He's not an NFL prospect (small), but he's mobile, has a solid arm, solid mechanics, and looks pretty fucking good all around. Guys like this can tear it up in college. I don't give a fuck if we never recruit another NFL QB as long as he finds someone that can throw the ball to the guys in black and lavender and khaki and white.

    One thing I like about his film over almost all HS QB films I've seen is how often he throws the ball hard. Too much touch pass shit going on in most QB films. Most any hack can throw it up for wide open receivers to run under, or swerve to, or stop for etc. All those lobs don't tell you if they have the knack for hitting a guy in stride when the defense forces you to throw hard.

    Great thanks for the scouting report.

    If Smith stumbled into a diamond in the rough again this year then great.

    The concern is that this makes two years in a row that Smith had no discernible plan for recruiting the QB position and offered and missed on nearly every big prospect on the west coast.
    Fuck you it wasn't a scouting report. Just my quick assessment and an attempt at objectivity to temper the uproar that occurs every time someone that USC didn't offer commits to UW.

    But you're absolutely right about Smith. No argument from me there. He's a liability in every aspect.
    Didn't mean to be in sarcasm mode sorry chuck. Your observations are appreciated.
    Haha no worries. The fuck you wasn't really called for. Except that posting on this site does actually call for for it. Pretty sure it's in the rules.
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,276
    AEB said:

    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory

    If he came in a darker shade, he'd be the next Keith Price
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,057 Swaye's Wigwam

    AEB said:

    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory

    If he came in a darker shade, he'd be the next Keith Price
    I thought of Price too, but then realized that's impossible. He looks like QB with some athleticism, rather than an athlete learning to play QB. More of a cerebral, lunch pail, gym rat type. Plus something else was just different about him that I couldn't put my finger on.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    AEB said:

    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory

    Is he a guy that you'd let your daughter date? A real film-room junkie with so many intangibles?
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882
    It doesn't matter what Smith thinks ... I'd be shocked if he ever coached this kid or Sirmon
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....

    And if UW didn't have Browning, it probably would have landed Eason. And then maybe missed on Sirmon down the line.

    Look, it'd be great if UW was one of those programs that could sign a 5-star QB every single year. It's not -- not yet, anyway.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    TTJ said:

    The '17 QB was always going to be an ins policy. DBG will be decent, and will nicely bridge Browning to Sirmon. Recruits watch each other, look at depth charts, want early PT. There are better indictments of Smith than this recruiting cycle.

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....
    "Elite" QB recruits are a fantasy born in the heads of experts like Barton, Grinnolds, Fetters, etc. then repeated by lazy bloggers until they've convinced themselves of their genius.

    Montana, Lindquist, Miles, Brown... NONE of them were elite. NONE of them were even mediocre. ALL of them stole a spot on the roster and held the team back.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    TTJ said:

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....

    And if UW didn't have Browning, it probably would have landed Eason. And then maybe missed on Sirmon down the line.

    Look, it'd be great if UW was one of those programs that could sign a 5-star QB every single year. It's not -- not yet, anyway.
    Probably not and probably not but anyways....

    There is a wide chasm between landing 5* QBs every single year and whiffing on your top 8-10 targets not once but two years in a row.
Sign In or Register to comment.