Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Woof

2»

Comments

  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited June 2016
    chuck said:

    chuck said:

    Some people are a little too caught up in stars and offers. Watch the film. He's not an NFL prospect (small), but he's mobile, has a solid arm, solid mechanics, and looks pretty fucking good all around. Guys like this can tear it up in college. I don't give a fuck if we never recruit another NFL QB as long as he finds someone that can throw the ball to the guys in black and lavender and khaki and white.

    One thing I like about his film over almost all HS QB films I've seen is how often he throws the ball hard. Too much touch pass shit going on in most QB films. Most any hack can throw it up for wide open receivers to run under, or swerve to, or stop for etc. All those lobs don't tell you if they have the knack for hitting a guy in stride when the defense forces you to throw hard.

    Great thanks for the scouting report.

    If Smith stumbled into a diamond in the rough again this year then great.

    The concern is that this makes two years in a row that Smith had no discernible plan for recruiting the QB position and offered and missed on nearly every big prospect on the west coast.
    Fuck you it wasn't a scouting report. Just my quick assessment and an attempt at objectivity to temper the uproar that occurs every time someone that USC didn't offer commits to UW.

    But you're absolutely right about Smith. No argument from me there. He's a liability in every aspect.
    Didn't mean to be in sarcasm mode sorry chuck. Your observations are appreciated.
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994
    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,683 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    chuck said:

    Some people are a little too caught up in stars and offers. Watch the film. He's not an NFL prospect (small), but he's mobile, has a solid arm, solid mechanics, and looks pretty fucking good all around. Guys like this can tear it up in college. I don't give a fuck if we never recruit another NFL QB as long as he finds someone that can throw the ball to the guys in black and lavender and khaki and white.

    One thing I like about his film over almost all HS QB films I've seen is how often he throws the ball hard. Too much touch pass shit going on in most QB films. Most any hack can throw it up for wide open receivers to run under, or swerve to, or stop for etc. All those lobs don't tell you if they have the knack for hitting a guy in stride when the defense forces you to throw hard.

    Great thanks for the scouting report.

    If Smith stumbled into a diamond in the rough again this year then great.

    The concern is that this makes two years in a row that Smith had no discernible plan for recruiting the QB position and offered and missed on nearly every big prospect on the west coast.
    Fuck you it wasn't a scouting report. Just my quick assessment and an attempt at objectivity to temper the uproar that occurs every time someone that USC didn't offer commits to UW.

    But you're absolutely right about Smith. No argument from me there. He's a liability in every aspect.
    Didn't mean to be in sarcasm mode sorry chuck. Your observations are appreciated.
    Haha no worries. The fuck you wasn't really called for. Except that posting on this site does actually call for for it. Pretty sure it's in the rules.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,513
    AEB said:

    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory

    If he came in a darker shade, he'd be the next Keith Price
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,683 Swaye's Wigwam

    AEB said:

    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory

    If he came in a darker shade, he'd be the next Keith Price
    I thought of Price too, but then realized that's impossible. He looks like QB with some athleticism, rather than an athlete learning to play QB. More of a cerebral, lunch pail, gym rat type. Plus something else was just different about him that I couldn't put my finger on.
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098
    AEB said:

    Just watched the film and can say, coach Pete definitely got the next Kellen Moore. Slightly undersized, accurate passer, cerebral.

    #obligatory

    Is he a guy that you'd let your daughter date? A real film-room junkie with so many intangibles?
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    It doesn't matter what Smith thinks ... I'd be shocked if he ever coached this kid or Sirmon
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....

    And if UW didn't have Browning, it probably would have landed Eason. And then maybe missed on Sirmon down the line.

    Look, it'd be great if UW was one of those programs that could sign a 5-star QB every single year. It's not -- not yet, anyway.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    TTJ said:

    The '17 QB was always going to be an ins policy. DBG will be decent, and will nicely bridge Browning to Sirmon. Recruits watch each other, look at depth charts, want early PT. There are better indictments of Smith than this recruiting cycle.

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....
    "Elite" QB recruits are a fantasy born in the heads of experts like Barton, Grinnolds, Fetters, etc. then repeated by lazy bloggers until they've convinced themselves of their genius.

    Montana, Lindquist, Miles, Brown... NONE of them were elite. NONE of them were even mediocre. ALL of them stole a spot on the roster and held the team back.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    TTJ said:

    Recruits also watch who their coaches are going to be.

    I could list a litany of examples of highly coveted QB recruits committing to programs with more crowded depth charts than UW. Elite schools with elite coaching staffs take an elite QB prospect every year. A good recruiter can always sell an opportunity no matter how small.


    When we ended up with Derrick Brown in 2011 it was OK because we had Montana from 2010 and Lindquist coming in behind (and later Cyler.) Where would the program be if we had signed Mariota or Hundley? Probably still 7-6 but fuck....

    And if UW didn't have Browning, it probably would have landed Eason. And then maybe missed on Sirmon down the line.

    Look, it'd be great if UW was one of those programs that could sign a 5-star QB every single year. It's not -- not yet, anyway.
    Probably not and probably not but anyways....

    There is a wide chasm between landing 5* QBs every single year and whiffing on your top 8-10 targets not once but two years in a row.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Mike Leach says Hi!
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,300

    I don't actually care about how good the kid is, I just want Smith fired

    +1000
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    Jake v3.0 will probably go over like Windows Vista.
  • tvoie
    tvoie Member Posts: 996
    So does Haener still suck?
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    tvoie said:

    So does Haener still suck?

    yes, until proven otherwise. We have 4QB on scholarship. Why in the gods name we offered him?
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795

    tvoie said:

    So does Haener still suck?

    yes, until proven otherwise. We have 4QB on scholarship. Why in the gods name we offered him?
    When Browning and KJCS are gone after 2018, the QBs on roster will be Bridge-Gadd (rJR), Haener (rSO), and Sirmon (rFR). You need at least 3 playable QBs on roster, and it would be much better to have Haener as an backup/insurance option than a true freshman. We needed a QB in this class for that reason, and we missed on the top 4 or 5 guys on our bored. Haener isn't as bad as people make him out to be and should be a serviceable backup by that point.

    Doesn't excuse the fact that we whiffed on so many guys ahead of him our board though. Sirmon should actually have to fight for a starting job when the time comes, not have it handed to him on a silver platter.
  • tvoie
    tvoie Member Posts: 996
    Seriously what if Sirmon ends up sucking?
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    NEsnake12 said:

    tvoie said:

    So does Haener still suck?

    yes, until proven otherwise. We have 4QB on scholarship. Why in the gods name we offered him?
    When Browning and KJCS are gone after 2018, the QBs on roster will be Bridge-Gadd (rJR), Haener (rSO), and Sirmon (rFR). You need at least 3 playable QBs on roster, and it would be much better to have Haener as an backup/insurance option than a true freshman. We needed a QB in this class for that reason, and we missed on the top 4 or 5 guys on our bored. Haener isn't as bad as people make him out to be and should be a serviceable backup by that point.

    Doesn't excuse the fact that we whiffed on so many guys ahead of him our board though. Sirmon should actually have to fight for a starting job when the time comes, not have it handed to him on a silver platter.
    Is that hard to find a QB that has a decent zip on the ball? Looks he has the same arm strength as Jake.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    tvoie said:

    tvoie said:

    Seriously what if Sirmon ends up sucking?


    Then someone else will play QB


    What if Petersen has a stroke?
    What if our entire DL dies in a drunk driving accident?
    What if Jimmy NoBalls leaves for Central?

    Or
    What if Bridge-Gadd develops into a great QB?

    This paranoid hypothetical shit on this site is crazy. We're a battered girlfriend whose boyfriend has been off the sauce for a month and we're just waiting for him to relapse.

    Let It Fucking Play Out
    We are spending our free time on a UW football board man. This is what we do. We nitpick and fret over high school kids becoming great college players so we can talk shit when our team wins a NC.
    this right here is the problem. it's not a free bored. it costs money to run it and only some of us are paying up to help. please consider not being a total douche and pony up homes.
  • dawgbrew
    dawgbrew Member Posts: 7
    I have never been more afraid of our DLine hopping in a car with ASJ at the wheel
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    dawgbrew said:

    I have never been more afraid of our DLine hopping in a car with ASJ at the wheel

    Get a fucking avatar you savage.