So lets see, Briles went 4-8, 4-8, 7-6...then 10-2 his 4th year then 8-5 his 5th. By most of your butthuffing logic he would have been fired after year 3. Certainly after his 8-5 finish in year 5.
Then 11-2, 11-2 , 10-3 and certainly would have won 10 or more this year and every year as the big12 stinks. Precisely why a coach needs 5 years to build a program.
Now lets look at Petersens record you rotten pissants. No lets not, I think you get the point. Pup always right whats the use?
Gaylor was a doormat. Washington was semi-respectable.
So lets see, Briles went 4-8, 4-8, 7-6...then 10-2 his 4th year then 8-5 his 5th. By most of your butthuffing logic he would have been fired after year 3. Certainly after his 8-5 finish in year 5.
Then 11-2, 11-2 , 10-3 and certainly would have won 10 or more this year and every year as the big12 stinks. Precisely why a coach needs 5 years to build a program.
Now lets look at Petersens record you rotten pissants. No lets not, I think you get the point. Pup always right whats the use?
Gaylor was a doormat. Washington was semi-respectable.
So lets see, Briles went 4-8, 4-8, 7-6...then 10-2 his 4th year then 8-5 his 5th. By most of your butthuffing logic he would have been fired after year 3. Certainly after his 8-5 finish in year 5.
Then 11-2, 11-2 , 10-3 and certainly would have won 10 or more this year and every year as the big12 stinks. Precisely why a coach needs 5 years to build a program.
Now lets look at Petersens record you rotten pissants. No lets not, I think you get the point. Pup always right whats the use?
Gaylor was a doormat. Washington was semi-respectable.
And Briles didnt have 4 d-III qb's on his roster. As ive said on countless occasions, UW has NEVER had a qb group as pitiful and incompetent as when Pete took over. Never in husky history, and its not even close. Even before the forward pass the dawgs had better qb's on the roster.
Sark was thee worst evaluator of QB talent Ive seen at ANY level of collegiate football. Steel2 and I scrambled through the entire country trying to find a school with worse scholarship QB's than Sark's. We had to dip down to d-2. Ironic considering Sark was a $upposed qb 'guru' and offensive 'genius'.
If anyone would like to debate this feel free. Good luck.
And Briles didnt have 4 d-III qb's on his roster. As ive said on countless occasions, UW has NEVER had a qb group as pitiful and incompetent as when Pete took over. Never in husky history, and its not even close. Even before the forward pass the dawgs had better qb's on the roster.
Sark was thee worst evaluator of QB talent Ive seen at ANY level of collegiate football. Steel2 and I scrambled through the entire country trying to find a school with worse scholarship QB's than Sark's. We had to dip down to d-2. Ironic considering Sark was a $upposed qb 'guru' and offensive 'genius'.
If anyone would like to debate this feel free. Good luck.
I just love how you go back and forth sucking and not sucking Sark's cock.
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
Weren't you the one claiming Sark would win the North in 2013?
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
Weren't you the one claiming Sark would win the North in 2013?
Reading comprehension. I predicted he'd win south in 15 too (which SC did). Does that make me Sark homer or just a prognosticator? We all know Pup's a legendary prognosticator so I think I answered your post
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
Weren't you the one claiming Sark would win the North in 2013?
Reading comprehension. I predicted he'd win south in 15 too (which SC did). Does that make me Sark homer or just a prognosticator? We all know Pup's a legendary prognosticator so I think I answered your post
Claiming Sark would win the North in 13 compared to the rest of us knowing he's a shitty coach is sucking his cock. HTH.
And Briles didnt have 4 d-III qb's on his roster. As ive said on countless occasions, UW has NEVER had a qb group as pitiful and incompetent as when Pete took over. Never in husky history, and its not even close. Even before the forward pass the dawgs had better qb's on the roster.
Sark was thee worst evaluator of QB talent Ive seen at ANY level of collegiate football. Steel2 and I scrambled through the entire country trying to find a school with worse scholarship QB's than Sark's. We had to dip down to d-2. Ironic considering Sark was a $upposed qb 'guru' and offensive 'genius'.
If anyone would like to debate this feel free. Good luck.
I just love how you go back and forth sucking and not sucking Sark's cock.
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
Weren't you the one claiming Sark would win the North in 2013?
Reading comprehension. I predicted he'd win south in 15 too (which SC did). Does that make me Sark homer or just a prognosticator? We all know Pup's a legendary prognosticator so I think I answered your post
You picked Cal to win the North in 2012. They went 3-9. That was my first encounter with the legendary prognosticator known as Steelheader. Or maybe Lambobacker? I forget.
When has Pup ever sucked off Sark? I was here railing on Sark when you pennypokers were in love with him. Saying he's going to win the conference isnt sucking him off.
Weren't you the one claiming Sark would win the North in 2013?
Reading comprehension. I predicted he'd win south in 15 too (which SC did). Does that make me Sark homer or just a prognosticator? We all know Pup's a legendary prognosticator so I think I answered your post
You picked Cal to win the North in 2012. They went 3-9. That was my first encounter with the legendary prognosticator known as Steelheader. Or maybe Lambobacker? I forget.
My first encounter with him was when he was "cford" and spent all of 2003 telling everyone that we? should bench Pickett for Paus.
Comments
Sark was thee worst evaluator of QB talent Ive seen at ANY level of collegiate football. Steel2 and I scrambled through the entire country trying to find a school with worse scholarship QB's than Sark's. We had to dip down to d-2. Ironic considering Sark was a $upposed qb 'guru' and offensive 'genius'.
If anyone would like to debate this feel free. Good luck.
Kimerrr Puppy.it would be wrong for race to photochop ty in a baylor shirt, not rape wrong but shoplifting from the penny candy wrong.
Testes 12...3?