Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Someone needs to stop Pete
Comments
-
He had two really good years at ASU ('96 and '97). He couldn't sustain it and they reverted back to mediocrity. They were mediocre from '92 to '95 also. So in his nine years, he had two good to great years. They aren't really a power, but they have more resources and a better recruiting base than whOregon, WSU, Oregon State, Stanford, Kal (resources, recruiting base wise maybe they're a little behind), and Utah. They can recruit Valley of the Heat Stroke, SoCal, NorCal, NW (people want to get the hell out of the shitty weather), and Texas. Arizona schools can recruit Texas easier than Northwest schools (besides WhOregon and their bribes). West Texas including Midland, Lubbock, and Amarillo are closer than the Bay Area. SA, DFW, and Austin are closer to Phx and Tucson than Seattle.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
He turned 2 different turds into title contending teams Bill. Good fucking hell how isnt that elite. Sorry bill but u fucked in head on this.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Bruce Snyder had two really good years and one or two decent years at Kal and ASU, but they regressed (ASSU) by 1998. He's nowhere near elite. Even a "Doog" like me can see that.
-
What the hell are you talking about? Im the ONLY one here next to Steel2 who knows Petersen will be extremely successful here. Thats the way pup will be right Derek.DerekJohnson said:Puppy wants Pete to fail just so he can be right?
-
He was in Urban Meyers league. Imagine if he took over perennial powers like Urban. BTW, still the only coach in pac history to turn 2 different doormats into title contenders. Erickson didnt just to bury that myth now.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
He had two really good years at ASU ('96 and '97). He couldn't sustain it and they reverted back to mediocrity. They were mediocre from '92 to '95 also. So in his nine years, he had two good to great years. They aren't really a power, but they have more resources and a better recruiting base than whOregon, WSU, Oregon State, Stanford, Kal (resources, recruiting base wise maybe they're a little behind), and Utah. They can recruit Valley of the Heat Stroke, SoCal, NorCal, NW (people want to get the hell out of the shitty weather), and Texas. Arizona schools can recruit Texas easier than Northwest schools (besides WhOregon and their bribes). West Texas including Midland, Lubbock, and Amarillo are closer than the Bay Area. SA, DFW, and Austin are closer to Phx and Tucson than Seattle.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
He turned 2 different turds into title contending teams Bill. Good fucking hell how isnt that elite. Sorry bill but u fucked in head on this.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Bruce Snyder had two really good years and one or two decent years at Kal and ASU, but they regressed (ASSU) by 1998. He's nowhere near elite. Even a "Doog" like me can see that.
Edit: just read your entire post Bill. The hell are you rambling about? -
If you're comparing him to failures, you obviously expect him to fail.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What the hell are you talking about? Im the ONLY one here next to Steel2 who knows Petersen will be extremely successful here. Thats the way pup will be right Derek.DerekJohnson said:Puppy wants Pete to fail just so he can be right?
-
Baabs I wont even answer to you anymore. You are so far from even clueless. I cant even knock the most obvious and factual reason into that pea brain of yours. Last one.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you're comparing him to failures, you obviously expect him to fail.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What the hell are you talking about? Im the ONLY one here next to Steel2 who knows Petersen will be extremely successful here. Thats the way pup will be right Derek.DerekJohnson said:Puppy wants Pete to fail just so he can be right?
-
You love football coaches from 20 years ago who almost accomplished something.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baabs I wont even answer to you anymore. You are so far from even clueless. I cant even knock the most obvious and factual reason into that pea brain of yours. Last one.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you're comparing him to failures, you obviously expect him to fail.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
What the hell are you talking about? Im the ONLY one here next to Steel2 who knows Petersen will be extremely successful here. Thats the way pup will be right Derek.DerekJohnson said:Puppy wants Pete to fail just so he can be right?
It's a shame you are a football dinosaur. -
Crickets...did someone address pumpy
? -
A historical look back on popular Football Metrics by yearspuppylove_sugarsteel said:Few coaches can turn 1. Remember, Snyder almost beat 91 team (closest game all year)
Only team to beat lamb and dillon in regular season
1900-1989: Winning
1990-1999: QB Efficiency
2000-2015: WPA (Win Probability Added)
2016: AMW (Almost Wins)
-
7-6 (4-5)
Roll Tide! -
Hmmmmm. Clearly not top 3 in the nation, and he certainly hasn't proven he's top 3 in the conference, but who are you taking over him? Shaw for sure, after that Pete's got 2 BCS bowel wins, which get an asterisk since they didn't come in the Pac, but even with an asterisk I think they outshine anybody else in the Pac's resume. Maybe you could argue for Dick Rod, or Slicer could argue for Leach, but I'm taking Pete over either of them. Who else would you even put up there, Slingblade?RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
He needs to get better. Just being top 3 in the Pac12FuckingDreckfest isnt good enough, don't twist, but I do think Pete's in the top 3.
