My house doesn't have a basement. Lucky for me I have a foot of room in between walls to replace the insulation with the corpses my enemies. I have to conduct ritual sacrifice in the shed out back. Mom says it's cool as long as I clean up after myself.
A better question is why did Double-chin Patron try to run him off....?
And Hudson et al...?
I have a friend whose younger brother played at UW under Sark. He said the OL would cut and argue over who got to go against Tupou and Finau in one on one's. I was shocked to see him ever do anything on the field.
Pete teaches technique. The whole team had to learn how to play football again. And you wonder why dipshits like J, Race, Base, turd, nacho criticize Pete for going 7-6 his 2nd year. He said it will take 2 years to implement his system...he was right. Sark was an absolute disaster as a head coach. Yet the aforementioned still suckle on his teets. Its comedy, I enjoy the senseless and ignorant banter. Go getem guys. (For steel2...the groomers at sun valley)
All I'm asking for is consistency. I watched Harv get banned from a distance, just for telling the truth and being a cunt about it. I do that here every day. Then there's AZDuck, which again, was a bullshit banning. And HNMT, who was obviously going through some personal shit and I didn't like how that was handled. Shit, he tried to ban @QuornDawg but I told him to fuck off.
I like DJ, but I do not understand why he is trigger happy with certain posters and I do not understand why he stands up ("lol") for that racist piece of shit puppy love. Seems to me that the only offense shared in common by the banned users is they refuse to suck Derek's dick and apologize up and down when they get a reprimand.
A better question is why did Double-chin Patron try to run him off....?
And Hudson et al...?
I have a friend whose younger brother played at UW under Sark. He said the OL would cut and argue over who got to go against Tupou and Finau in one on one's. I was shocked to see him ever do anything on the field.
Pete teaches technique. The whole team had to learn how to play football again. And you wonder why dipshits like J, Race, Base, turd, nacho criticize Pete for going 7-6 his 2nd year. He said it will take 2 years to implement his system...he was right. Sark was an absolute disaster as a head coach. Yet the aforementioned still suckle on his teets. Its comedy, I enjoy the senseless and ignorant banter. Go getem guys. (For steel2...the groomers at sun valley)
A better question is why did Double-chin Patron try to run him off....?
And Hudson et al...?
I have a friend whose younger brother played at UW under Sark. He said the OL would cut and argue over who got to go against Tupou and Finau in one on one's. I was shocked to see him ever do anything on the field.
Pete teaches technique. The whole team had to learn how to play football again. And you wonder why dipshits like J, Race, Base, turd, nacho criticize Pete for going 7-6 his 2nd year. He said it will take 2 years to implement his system...he was right. Sark was an absolute disaster as a head coach. Yet the aforementioned still suckle on his teets. Its comedy, I enjoy the senseless and ignorant banter. Go getem guys. (For steel2...the groomers at sun valley)
I don't have lots to say with this thread but to call me trigger happy is ridiculous. The few people I've banned I've usually given numerous warnings to the point of almost pleading with them in PMs that they were giving me no alternative.
The Quorndawg banning was a case where I lost my temper and soon after I apologized to him privately and publicly and brought him back. That's the only time I can think of where I didn't follow procedure.
There was a case with ChrisVashon roughly 18 months ago when I was receiving threats and I put a filter on to identify a certain poster's attempts at registering under different handles. But unfortunately it ended up automatically banning innocent posters. Vashon was a guy I didn't like but I never wanted him banned. I emailed him asking him to come back but never got a response. That was around the time Grundle was banned for a few hours. He got swept up by the filter. I quickly disbanded that particular filter.
For the record, I stated about a year ago that if Sven became a Butler Cabin donator I would unban Harv (even though I don't think Harv wants to be here).
My house doesn't have a basement. Lucky for me I have a foot of room in between walls to replace the insulation with the corpses my enemies. I have to conduct ritual sacrifice in the shed out back. Mom says it's cool as long as I clean up after myself.
I don't have lots to say with this thread but to call me trigger happy is ridiculous. The few people I've banned I've usually given numerous warnings to the point of almost pleading with them in PMs that they were giving me no alternative.
The Quorndawg banning was a case where I lost my temper and soon after I apologized to him privately and publicly and brought him back. That's the only time I can think of where I didn't follow procedure.
There was a case with ChrisVashon roughly 18 months ago when I was receiving threats and I put a filter on to identify a certain poster's attempts at registering under different handles. But unfortunately it ended up automatically banning innocent posters. Vashon was a guy I didn't like but I never wanted him banned. I emailed him asking him to come back but never got a response. That was around the time Grundle was banned for a few hours. He got swept up by the filter. I quickly disbanded that particular filter.
For the record, I stated about a year ago that if Sven became a Butler Cabin donator I would unban Harv (even though I don't think Harv wants to be here).
*crickets*
The filters work for you. Not the other way around. Can we at least free @AZDuck ? He was Butler Cabin. I think cockus has done his time and doesn't need more. Don't let me go home to dads' basement empty handed here.
I don't have lots to say with this thread but to call me trigger happy is ridiculous. The few people I've banned I've usually given numerous warnings to the point of almost pleading with them in PMs that they were giving me no alternative.
The Quorndawg banning was a case where I lost my temper and soon after I apologized to him privately and publicly and brought him back. That's the only time I can think of where I didn't follow procedure.
There was a case with ChrisVashon roughly 18 months ago when I was receiving threats and I put a filter on to identify a certain poster's attempts at registering under different handles. But unfortunately it ended up automatically banning innocent posters. Vashon was a guy I didn't like but I never wanted him banned. I emailed him asking him to come back but never got a response. That was around the time Grundle was banned for a few hours. He got swept up by the filter. I quickly disbanded that particular filter.
For the record, I stated about a year ago that if Sven became a Butler Cabin donator I would unban Harv (even though I don't think Harv wants to be here).
*crickets*
The filters work for you. Not the other way around. Can we at least free @AZDuck ? He was Butler Cabin. I think cockus has done his time and doesn't need more. Don't let me go home to dads' basement empty handed here.
Why does it matter whether Harvey Road wants to be here? There's an easy way to find out -- just un-ban him and see if he wants to poast or not.
If he hasn't done anything wrong (other than not being liked by the original bored of investors) it seems like he should be given a chance, considering what others have been allowed to say here.
The whole situation doesn't make sense. He's banned because he needs to ask harder to come back? Or because Sven won't donate? Strange criteria.
Why does it matter whether Harvey Road wants to be here? There's an easy way to find out -- just un-ban him and see if he wants to poast or not.
If he hasn't done anything wrong (other than not being liked by the original bored of investors) it seems like he should be given a chance, considering what others have been allowed to say here.
The whole situation doesn't make sense. He's banned because he needs to ask harder to come back? Or because Sven won't donate? Strange criteria.
Everyone is talking about the difference between Derek and Kim.
Why does it matter whether Harvey Road wants to be here? There's an easy way to find out -- just un-ban him and see if he wants to poast or not.
If he hasn't done anything wrong (other than not being liked by the original bored of investors) it seems like he should be given a chance, considering what others have been allowed to say here.
The whole situation doesn't make sense. He's banned because he needs to ask harder to come back? Or because Sven won't donate? Strange criteria.
There was initial resistance to him being here in 2013 from members of the Bored of Investors. Harv had briefly stalked a family member on Twitter, which we viewed as out of bounds.
In my discussions with Harv, I did tell him he could be an asset here. He scoffed at that and then told me that this website was a good thing and was needed for Husky fans and that he was going to go back to Twitter and would always hate the Huskies (or words to that effect).
And that was that, other than Sven posting FreeHarv in every third post since then.
Why does it matter whether Harvey Road wants to be here? There's an easy way to find out -- just un-ban him and see if he wants to poast or not.
If he hasn't done anything wrong (other than not being liked by the original bored of investors) it seems like he should be given a chance, considering what others have been allowed to say here.
The whole situation doesn't make sense. He's banned because he needs to ask harder to come back? Or because Sven won't donate? Strange criteria.
There was initial resistance to him being here in 2013 from members of the Bored of Investors. Harv had briefly stalked a family member on Twitter, which we viewed as out of bounds.
In my discussions with Harv, I did tell him he could be an asset here. He scoffed at that and then told me that this website was a good thing and was needed for Husky fans and that he was going to go back to Twitter and would always hate the Huskies (or words to that effect).
And that was that, other than Sven posting FreeHarv in every third post since then.
Why does it matter whether Harvey Road wants to be here? There's an easy way to find out -- just un-ban him and see if he wants to poast or not.
If he hasn't done anything wrong (other than not being liked by the original bored of investors) it seems like he should be given a chance, considering what others have been allowed to say here.
The whole situation doesn't make sense. He's banned because he needs to ask harder to come back? Or because Sven won't donate? Strange criteria.
There was initial resistance to him being here in 2013 from members of the Bored of Investors. Harv had briefly stalked a family member on Twitter, which we viewed as out of bounds.
In my discussions with Harv, I did tell him he could be an asset here. He scoffed at that and then told me that this website was a good thing and was needed for Husky fans and that he was going to go back to Twitter and would always hate the Huskies (or words to that effect).
And that was that, other than Sven posting FreeHarv in every third post since then.
I don't have lots to say with this thread but to call me trigger happy is ridiculous. The few people I've banned I've usually given numerous warnings to the point of almost pleading with them in PMs that they were giving me no alternative.
The Quorndawg banning was a case where I lost my temper and soon after I apologized to him privately and publicly and brought him back. That's the only time I can think of where I didn't follow procedure.
There was a case with ChrisVashon roughly 18 months ago when I was receiving threats and I put a filter on to identify a certain poster's attempts at registering under different handles. But unfortunately it ended up automatically banning innocent posters. Vashon was a guy I didn't like but I never wanted him banned. I emailed him asking him to come back but never got a response. That was around the time Grundle was banned for a few hours. He got swept up by the filter. I quickly disbanded that particular filter.
For the record, I stated about a year ago that if Sven became a Butler Cabin donator I would unban Harv (even though I don't think Harv wants to be here).
*crickets*
The filters work for you. Not the other way around. Can we at least free @AZDuck ? He was Butler Cabin. I think cockus has done his time and doesn't need more. Don't let me go home to dads' basement empty handed here.
I don't have lots to say with this thread but to call me trigger happy is ridiculous. The few people I've banned I've usually given numerous warnings to the point of almost pleading with them in PMs that they were giving me no alternative.
The Quorndawg banning was a case where I lost my temper and soon after I apologized to him privately and publicly and brought him back. That's the only time I can think of where I didn't follow procedure.
There was a case with ChrisVashon roughly 18 months ago when I was receiving threats and I put a filter on to identify a certain poster's attempts at registering under different handles. But unfortunately it ended up automatically banning innocent posters. Vashon was a guy I didn't like but I never wanted him banned. I emailed him asking him to come back but never got a response. That was around the time Grundle was banned for a few hours. He got swept up by the filter. I quickly disbanded that particular filter.
For the record, I stated about a year ago that if Sven became a Butler Cabin donator I would unban Harv (even though I don't think Harv wants to be here).
*crickets*
The filters work for you. Not the other way around. Can we at least free @AZDuck ? He was Butler Cabin. I think cockus has done his time and doesn't need more. Don't let me go home to dads' basement empty handed here.
so we're negotiating now?
That's the problem with Hardcore Husky. We don't make GREAT deals anymore. Trading Boobs for Chest was a GREAT deal. Why can't we make more deals like that? I'll tell you what we're gonna do. We're gonna make the BEST deals! I believe in trade, but it has to be a FAIR trade that's slanted heavily in my favor. If we wanna make HH GREAT again we need to start making GREAT deals again!
Comments
Didn't think so
The Quorndawg banning was a case where I lost my temper and soon after I apologized to him privately and publicly and brought him back. That's the only time I can think of where I didn't follow procedure.
There was a case with ChrisVashon roughly 18 months ago when I was receiving threats and I put a filter on to identify a certain poster's attempts at registering under different handles. But unfortunately it ended up automatically banning innocent posters. Vashon was a guy I didn't like but I never wanted him banned. I emailed him asking him to come back but never got a response. That was around the time Grundle was banned for a few hours. He got swept up by the filter. I quickly disbanded that particular filter.
For the record, I stated about a year ago that if Sven became a Butler Cabin donator I would unban Harv (even though I don't think Harv wants to be here).
*crickets*
FREE HARVEY ROAD
If he hasn't done anything wrong (other than not being liked by the original bored of investors) it seems like he should be given a chance, considering what others have been allowed to say here.
The whole situation doesn't make sense. He's banned because he needs to ask harder to come back? Or because Sven won't donate? Strange criteria.
In my discussions with Harv, I did tell him he could be an asset here. He scoffed at that and then told me that this website was a good thing and was needed for Husky fans and that he was going to go back to Twitter and would always hate the Huskies (or words to that effect).
And that was that, other than Sven posting FreeHarv in every third post since then.