BWWSASLYPOTD
Comments
-
NOGAFATSFHA
-
Christ.
-
At least Peterman is a straight shooter.
Better than, "Quite honestly, it's flattering to be ranked so highly. It shows our philosophy is finally starting to rub off on the kids. Buy in has been better than ever this summer, and the kids are starting to truly expect to win. It took longer than I thought, quite honestly, but honestly these things take time." -
needs to win 8-9 in 16, '17 10-11, '18 playoff. There's my expectations...and anyone who understands college football. Do I think he'll win more? Well he was 92-12 for a reason. And to all the inevitable responses from turds like J, Race and tommy. ..college football is relative. Players differ at every level of football, but relatively the same per NCAA classification and corresponding conference.
Boise st recruited b-list players like everyone in the MWC or WAC did. Now Pete recruits A-list kids like the other 5 power conferences. Its what you do with the players youre dealt.
On even footing I expect Pete's record to mirror what he did at Boise, just like tressel did from Youngstown to Ohio st, or Meyer from Utah to Florida. However both guys didnt inherit a team off NCAA Sark Sanctions. Year 3, pete's guys (almost). Takes 4-5 years to build a program. Be patient, Peter will. Thinks unfortunately not the same respectively. Plus pac12 the toughest conference in the land. Be patient, dont expect miracles (although you might see one this year, 2 years ahead if schedule). Thats BECAUSE of Pete and no other way.
.Every cunt who rails on Peter going forward will get bootstomped with words by puppy. Who wants to go first bitches? -
9-9 > 8-10puppylove_sugarsteel said:needs to win 8-9 in 16, '17 10-11, '18 playoff. There's my expectations...and anyone who understands college football. Do I think he'll win more? Well he was 92-12 for a reason. And to all the inevitable responses from turds like J, Race and tommy. ..college football is relative. Players differ at every level of football, but relatively the same per NCAA classification and corresponding conference.
Boise st recruited b-list players like everyone in the MWC or WAC did. Now Pete recruits A-list kids like the other 5 power conferences. Its what you do with the players youre dealt.
On even footing I expect Pete's record to mirror what he did at Boise, just like tressel did from Youngstown to Ohio st, or Meyer from Utah to Florida. However both guys didnt inherit a team off NCAA Sark Sanctions. Year 3, pete's guys (almost). Takes 4-5 years to build a program. Be patient, Peter will. Thinks unfortunately not the same respectively. Plus pac12 the toughest conference in the land. Be patient, dont expect miracles (although you might see one this year, 2 years ahead if schedule). Thats BECAUSE of Pete and no other way.
.Every cunt who rails on Peter going forward will get bootstomped with words by puppy. Who wants to go first bitches?
It's cute how you blame Sark after sucking his dick for 7 straight years though.
Puppy bad at football. -
This. With a fucking bullet, preferably self-inflected to Puppy's temple so it puts him out of his misery.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
9-9 > 8-10puppylove_sugarsteel said:needs to win 8-9 in 16, '17 10-11, '18 playoff. There's my expectations...and anyone who understands college football. Do I think he'll win more? Well he was 92-12 for a reason. And to all the inevitable responses from turds like J, Race and tommy. ..college football is relative. Players differ at every level of football, but relatively the same per NCAA classification and corresponding conference.
Boise st recruited b-list players like everyone in the MWC or WAC did. Now Pete recruits A-list kids like the other 5 power conferences. Its what you do with the players youre dealt.
On even footing I expect Pete's record to mirror what he did at Boise, just like tressel did from Youngstown to Ohio st, or Meyer from Utah to Florida. However both guys didnt inherit a team off NCAA Sark Sanctions. Year 3, pete's guys (almost). Takes 4-5 years to build a program. Be patient, Peter will. Thinks unfortunately not the same respectively. Plus pac12 the toughest conference in the land. Be patient, dont expect miracles (although you might see one this year, 2 years ahead if schedule). Thats BECAUSE of Pete and no other way.
.Every cunt who rails on Peter going forward will get bootstomped with words by puppy. Who wants to go first bitches?
It's cute how you blame Sark after sucking his dick for 7 straight years though.
Puppy bad at football. -
If he only wins 8 games with this soft schedule he deserves to be fired.puppylove_sugarsteel said:needs to win 8-9 in 16, '17 10-11, '18 playoff. There's my expectations...and anyone who understands college football. Do I think he'll win more? Well he was 92-12 for a reason. And to all the inevitable responses from turds like J, Race and tommy. ..college football is relative. Players differ at every level of football, but relatively the same per NCAA classification and corresponding conference.
Boise st recruited b-list players like everyone in the MWC or WAC did. Now Pete recruits A-list kids like the other 5 power conferences. Its what you do with the players youre dealt.
On even footing I expect Pete's record to mirror what he did at Boise, just like tressel did from Youngstown to Ohio st, or Meyer from Utah to Florida. However both guys didnt inherit a team off NCAA Sark Sanctions. Year 3, pete's guys (almost). Takes 4-5 years to build a program. Be patient, Peter will. Thinks unfortunately not the same respectively. Plus pac12 the toughest conference in the land. Be patient, dont expect miracles (although you might see one this year, 2 years ahead if schedule). Thats BECAUSE of Pete and no other way.
.Every cunt who rails on Peter going forward will get bootstomped with words by puppy. Who wants to go first bitches? -
12-0 is definitely posible. 10-2 likely. Anything less is a travesty. Take your screen shots.
-
Case closedDeepSeaZ said:12-0 is definitely posible. 10-2 likely. Anything less is a travesty. Take your screen shots.
-
If it isn't this year it's no year with Pete. Non freshman QB, top RB, decent O-line, beast defense across the board, 3 years in the system, etc. 10 wins or DIAFF.
-
Especially with this schedule as @DerekJohnson pointed out.Swaye said:If it isn't this year it's no year with Pete. Non freshman QB, top RB, decent O-line, beast defense across the board, 3 years in the system, etc. 10 wins or DIAFF.
