Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hunter Bryant to UW

124

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Just wait until Socha gets his hands on him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,539
    Forgot about true SR @DisslyDawg. His upside isn't the highest but a real OKG.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,539
    Yes let's leave it at that.
    AIRWOLF said:

    HFNY said:

    Forgot about true SR @DisslyDawg. His upside isn't the highest but a real OKG.

    He is an extra Tackle and I mean that in the best way possible.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    The disrespect of Dissly is real! He is one of the most important players on the team. No joke.

    I don't know if he is "one of the most important players on the team," but his blocking is certainly underappreciated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    The disrespect of Dissly is real! He is one of the most important players on the team. No joke.

    I can't speak for anybody else, but I certainly meant my post as a compliment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ToddTurnerLIVES
    ToddTurnerLIVES Member Posts: 438
    I think Bryant would be better used on the defensive side of the ball, especially considering how little we use the tight end in the pass game. Cade Otton looks to be about the athlete that Drew Sample is and he is doing just fine. Bryant is a special athletic talent and it seems like it would be a waste to put him on the offensive side of the ball and get targeted 2 twice a game. If we are going to throw to him then I'm fine with him as TE... just don't want to see him wasted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    ToddTurnerLIVES said:

    I think Bryant would be better used on the defensive side of the ball, especially considering how little we use the tight end in the pass game. Cade Otton looks to be about the athlete that Drew Sample is and he is doing just fine. Bryant is a special athletic talent and it seems like it would be a waste to put him on the offensive side of the ball and get targeted 2 twice a game. If we are going to throw to him then I'm fine with him as TE... just don't want to see him wasted.

    One concern I don't have is that Petersen will squander special talent by under-utilizing it.

    If the Huskies have a TE worthy of being featured in the passing game, I would expect the offense to feature him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795
    AIRWOLF said:

    ToddTurnerLIVES said:

    I think Bryant would be better used on the defensive side of the ball, especially considering how little we use the tight end in the pass game. Cade Otton looks to be about the athlete that Drew Sample is and he is doing just fine. Bryant is a special athletic talent and it seems like it would be a waste to put him on the offensive side of the ball and get targeted 2 twice a game. If we are going to throw to him then I'm fine with him as TE... just don't want to see him wasted.

    One concern I don't have is that Petersen will squander special talent by under-utilizing it.

    If the Huskies have a TE worthy of being featured in the passing game, I would expect the offense to feature him.
    Exactky. See Perkins, Josh... not a good blocker but good receiving TE. So what did we do with him? Made him our 2nd leading receiver in 2015 (which isn't saying much given how abysmal the receivers were last year but still). The offense will always have an overall style, but schemes get tweaked based on the talent available. And Bryant is definitely a unique talent that can open up a lot of new looks for the offense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter