Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UCLA AD, and conference representative, goes rogue on satellite camps
RaccoonHarry
Member Posts: 2,161
and votes no. Trouble is, the schools voted 11-1 in favor. You can't make this up.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/4/20/11475718/pac-12-satellite-camp-ban-ucla-dan-guerrero
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/4/20/11475718/pac-12-satellite-camp-ban-ucla-dan-guerrero
Comments
-
-
It has to be unanimous? Fucking stupid organizations have fucking stupid rules
-
No, Guerrero just did whatever he wanted knowing that Larry Scott has no power. What's he gonna do- drop Pac-12 Network coverage of UCLA games?PostGameOrangeSlices said:It has to be unanimous? Fucking stupid organizations have fucking stupid rules
-
The best part is the MWC and Sun Belt reps also gave a giant middle finger to their conference commissioners and voted their own self interest.
But how is the Pac-12 a shit tier conference? -
Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
Loser attitude for a loser football programBallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
You mean like the entire SEC?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Loser attitude for a loser football programBallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
It's a no brainer to vote no to satellite camps if you're based out of southern california. With scholarship limits, why would you give free exposure to the 2nd/3rd tier athletes you pass on that have potential to be good to other programs?
Let them trickle to San Jose St. or get lost in the shuffle instead of developing in a P5 program and biting you in the ass 3-5 years down the road.
Of all the shit to bash UCLA on, this isn't one of them. -
Yeah no shit. But how does UCLA get to vote on their own self-interest instead of the will of the conference? Can you imagine the Minnesota AD crossing Jim Delaney like that? I think not.Doogles said:It's a no brainer to vote no to satellite camps if you're based out of southern california. With scholarship limits, why would you give free exposure to the 2nd/3rd tier athletes you pass on that have potential to be good to other programs?
Let them trickle to San Jose St. or get lost in the shuffle instead of developing in a P5 program and biting you in the ass 3-5 years down the road.
Of all the shit to bash UCLA on, this isn't one of them.
(On a side note I actually think the ban is in the self interest of UW as well. Increased exposure of Nebraska, Michigan, Oklahoma, et al in SoCal would not have been good for UW and I can't see CP taking huge advantage of the rule- he has his established process.) -
Bruins are fags. Water is wet.
