Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We have a WOOF!

24

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    TurdBuffer said:

    Dash your hopes now. UW will still find a way to slump and lose 10+ games. The Pac12 has UW's mental-weakness number dialed-in.

    I'll happily be proven wrong.

    Jackson is better than Chriss. Fultz is better than Murray.

    Get it now?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    ThomasFremont said:

    dnc said:

    This is seriously a huge get for Romar. Jackson + Fultz >>> Chriss and Murray. I still have my doubts that he signs on the dotted line, but if he does, his really could be our? year!

    Seriously THIS.

    Chriss and Murray were both top 100 guys, but Jackson and Fultz are both top 10 guys. In a stronger overall class.

    Add in a more experienced supporting cast and my sweatpants are starting to get stretched.
    Still not clicking the link, guys!!!1
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    You really think we missed the NCAA tourney because we lacked sufficient talent?

    Christ.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    TurdBuffer said:

    You really think we missed the NCAA tourney because we lacked sufficient talent?

    Chriss.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    TurdBuffer said:

    You really think we missed the NCAA tourney because we lacked sufficient talent?

    Christ.

    If you can't see the difference between two top 10 players and the guys we had this year, I just can't help you. Chriss and Murray are NBA projects. Jackson and Fultz are already lottery picks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    I just hope they get paid as much as the women.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    PurpleJ said:

    I just hope they get paid as much as the women.

    Until they make a FF, they should be getting paid less.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    ThomasFremont said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I just hope they get paid as much as the women.

    Until they make a FF, they should be getting paid less.
    A bit sexist, but fair.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    PurpleJ said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I just hope they get paid as much as the women.

    Until they make a FF, they should be getting paid less.
    A bit sexist, but fair.
    I'm nothing if not fair.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    What I'm saying, TF, is that with everything being the same, even next year's team is likely to under-achieve. And the year after, when those two one-and-dones head off to the NBA too. Once again, the problem is the program, not the players. I'm not going to break rocks again to explain the difference to you guys who say "blaming one-and-dones is wrong," blah, blah, blah. Nobody is blaming the one-and-dones for harming the program. Rather, their absence the following year requires a reset, a hole to fill on the roster, and prevents the program from reaching fruition. The blame goes to the coaches who recruit one-and-dones when they need to build the program. Once it's built, and winning, bring on the one-and-dones for a deep tourney run. Until then, they contribute one year at a time, and it's back to square one. With this year's highly ranked one-and-dones, UW didn't even come close. Maybe next year they squeak in. But after 30 games UW still played like shit in the crunch, so I have no reason to hope next year's team will be much different, even if it's better than this years. Same problems. Same shit. And I am happy to be proven wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter