You're right as far as high profile decisions are concerned (Obamacare, gay marriage, etc.), but SCOTUS being split on liberal-conservative lines for "basically every decision" or even "most decisions" is total fiction.
Just looking at 2015's voting breakdown, the "least agreeable" justice was Alito, and he agreed with the majority SCOTUS judgment 82.4% of the time. This same trend plays out for the other years as well.
You're right as far as high profile decisions are concerned (Obamacare, gay marriage, etc.), but SCOTUS being split on liberal-conservative lines for "basically every decision" or even "most decisions" is total fiction.
Just looking at 2015's voting breakdown, the "least agreeable" justice was Alito, and he agreed with the majority SCOTUS judgment 82.4% of the time. This same trend plays out for the other years as well.
I'd actually like to see that information. Because it seems like every decision that the media brings up is 5-4.
However, maybe that's more a function of decisions that come into public light they need to follow the party line. Or the opposite, that the media doesn't make a big deal about 8-1 decisions.
You're right as far as high profile decisions are concerned (Obamacare, gay marriage, etc.), but SCOTUS being split on liberal-conservative lines for "basically every decision" or even "most decisions" is total fiction.
Just looking at 2015's voting breakdown, the "least agreeable" justice was Alito, and he agreed with the majority SCOTUS judgment 82.4% of the time. This same trend plays out for the other years as well.
I'd actually like to see that information. Because it seems like every decision that the media brings up is 5-4.
However, maybe that's more a function of decisions that come into public light they need to follow the party line. Or the opposite, that the media doesn't make a big deal about 8-1 decisions.
You're right as far as high profile decisions are concerned (Obamacare, gay marriage, etc.), but SCOTUS being split on liberal-conservative lines for "basically every decision" or even "most decisions" is total fiction.
Just looking at 2015's voting breakdown, the "least agreeable" justice was Alito, and he agreed with the majority SCOTUS judgment 82.4% of the time. This same trend plays out for the other years as well.
I'd actually like to see that information. Because it seems like every decision that the media brings up is 5-4.
However, maybe that's more a function of decisions that come into public light they need to follow the party line. Or the opposite, that the media doesn't make a big deal about 8-1 decisions.
Comments
Fuck SCOTUS
Just looking at 2015's voting breakdown, the "least agreeable" justice was Alito, and he agreed with the majority SCOTUS judgment 82.4% of the time. This same trend plays out for the other years as well.
However, maybe that's more a function of decisions that come into public light they need to follow the party line. Or the opposite, that the media doesn't make a big deal about 8-1 decisions.
The question is more, what constitutes media, not that they are lying.
Wikipedia has information for every year's SCOTUS opinions. Most people just don't give a shit about the majority of the decisions the court rules on.