What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Hillary wasn't a progressive until Bernie forced her to be one.
If she gets the nomination, she'll drop the act and go back to her roots; being whatever she thinks will win her the general election.
I agree, the opportunist in her will drive her to appear whatever she thinks she needs to appear to win, but her actions have always been that of a hard line progressive. Hillarycare is exhibit A on the national stage.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Hillary wasn't a progressive until Bernie forced her to be one.
If she gets the nomination, she'll drop the act and go back to her roots; being whatever she thinks will win her the general election.
I agree, the opportunist in her will drive her to appear whatever she thinks she needs to appear to win, but her actions have always been that of a hard line progressive. Hillarycare is exhibit A on the national stage.
I guess, but "hardline" progressives don't flip flop on as many issues as she has.
Just watch, she will stop mentioning Obama as soon as she gets the nomination, after riding his dick for the last few weeks.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Hillary wasn't a progressive until Bernie forced her to be one.
If she gets the nomination, she'll drop the act and go back to her roots; being whatever she thinks will win her the general election.
I agree, the opportunist in her will drive her to appear whatever she thinks she needs to appear to win, but her actions have always been that of a hard line progressive. Hillarycare is exhibit A on the national stage.
I guess, but "hardline" progressives don't flip flop on as many issues as she has.
Just watch, she will stop mentioning Obama as soon as she gets the nomination, after riding his dick for the last few weeks.
If she doesn't get indicted first. DNC doesn't feel the Bern and they'll need time to get their own guy in there.
Wheels of justice will turn quickly now. Very quickly.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Exactly. I love how the central planner/nanny state/authoritarian bunch has co-opted the word "liberal" to make themselves sound so open and non-threatening. And as we've all learned, if you say something enough times, especially to the brain-dead public, it becomes the de-facto truth. Hillary Clinton is as liberal as puppy is politically correct.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Hillary wasn't a progressive until Bernie forced her to be one.
If she gets the nomination, she'll drop the act and go back to her roots; being whatever she thinks will win her the general election.
I agree, the opportunist in her will drive her to appear whatever she thinks she needs to appear to win, but her actions have always been that of a hard line progressive. Hillarycare is exhibit A on the national stage.
I guess, but "hardline" progressives don't flip flop on as many issues as she has.
Just watch, she will stop mentioning Obama as soon as she gets the nomination, after riding his dick for the last few weeks.
If she doesn't get indicted first. DNC doesn't feel the Bern and they'll need time to get their own guy in there.
Wheels of justice will turn quickly now. Very quickly.
I agree with your take on the DNC, but the Obama administration has control over the Attorney General, not that Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder before her would ever indict Hillary Clinton on their own. Bottom line, if Obama doesn't want an indictment, it won't happen without something like a massive leak from the FBI that might force his hand, and even that might not be enough. We'll see, but the Clintons have always been extremely slippery, and she appears to be pandering to Obama's base while at the same time making quid pro quo deals with him. Supreme Court Justice Obama, right out of House of Cards. Can't make this shit up.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Hillary wasn't a progressive until Bernie forced her to be one.
If she gets the nomination, she'll drop the act and go back to her roots; being whatever she thinks will win her the general election.
I agree, the opportunist in her will drive her to appear whatever she thinks she needs to appear to win, but her actions have always been that of a hard line progressive. Hillarycare is exhibit A on the national stage.
I guess, but "hardline" progressives don't flip flop on as many issues as she has.
Just watch, she will stop mentioning Obama as soon as she gets the nomination, after riding his dick for the last few weeks.
If she doesn't get indicted first. DNC doesn't feel the Bern and they'll need time to get their own guy in there.
Wheels of justice will turn quickly now. Very quickly.
I agree with your take on the DNC, but the Obama administration has control over the Attorney General, not that Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder before her would ever indict Hillary Clinton on their own. Bottom line, if Obama doesn't want an indictment, it won't happen without something like a massive leak from the FBI that might force his hand, and even that might not be enough. We'll see, but the Clintons have always been extremely slippery, and she appears to be pandering to Obama's base while at the same time making quid pro quo deals with him. Supreme Court Justice Obama, right out of House of Cards. Can't make this shit up.
Agree on the House Of Cards angle but also know Uncle Joe is sitting out there as the sympathetic, rise from grief to the rescue the party/country candidate.
Biden much more electable vs. whoever survives the GOP play-in rounds.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Exactly. I love how the central planner/nanny state/authoritarian bunch has co-opted the word "liberal" to make themselves sound so open and non-threatening. And as we've all learned, if you say something enough times, especially to the brain-dead public, it becomes the de-facto truth. Hillary Clinton is as liberal as puppy is politically correct.
Thomas Jefferson was a fucking liberal.
Kinda like the GOP co-opting the term conservative to make themselves appear rational.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Exactly. I love how the central planner/nanny state/authoritarian bunch has co-opted the word "liberal" to make themselves sound so open and non-threatening. And as we've all learned, if you say something enough times, especially to the brain-dead public, it becomes the de-facto truth. Hillary Clinton is as liberal as puppy is politically correct.
Thomas Jefferson was a fucking liberal.
Kinda like the GOP co-opting the term conservative to make themselves appear rational.
What's with the labels, man?
A history major should know that being a conservative was anything but considered rational until Ronald Raygun made it respectable. From that point every Republican calls themselves a conservative, including the ones you hob nob with at the Country Club.
The schism today in the GOP is because of the GOPers that still think conservatives are not rational
Goldwater made his stand on less government and state's rights at the same time LBJ was pushing civil rights and state's rights were a code word for keeping Jim Crow. Hence, conservatives are racist, still the playbook after all these years.
What's the difference between a progressive and a socialist?
answer: A coin toss.
Hilary is a liberal, not a progressive.
There's nothing particularly liberal about Hillary. She is much more a "ram it down your throat" progressive, and as Race pointed out, an opportunist.
Exactly. I love how the central planner/nanny state/authoritarian bunch has co-opted the word "liberal" to make themselves sound so open and non-threatening. And as we've all learned, if you say something enough times, especially to the brain-dead public, it becomes the de-facto truth. Hillary Clinton is as liberal as puppy is politically correct.
Thomas Jefferson was a fucking liberal.
Kinda like the GOP co-opting the term conservative to make themselves appear rational.
What's with the labels, man?
A history major should know that being a conservative was anything but considered rational until Ronald Raygun made it respectable. From that point every Republican calls themselves a conservative, including the ones you hob nob with at the Country Club.
The schism today in the GOP is because of the GOPers that still think conservatives are not rational
Goldwater made his stand on less government and state's rights at the same time LBJ was pushing civil rights and state's rights were a code word for keeping Jim Crow. Hence, conservatives are racist, still the playbook after all these years.
Agreed. Crazy irrational bible thumpers have ruined true conservatism.
d2d
Member Posts: 3,109
Comments
answer: A coin toss.
If she gets the nomination, she'll drop the act and go back to her roots; being whatever she thinks will win her the general election.
Just watch, she will stop mentioning Obama as soon as she gets the nomination, after riding his dick for the last few weeks.
Wheels of justice will turn quickly now. Very quickly.
Thomas Jefferson was a fucking liberal.
Biden much more electable vs. whoever survives the GOP play-in rounds.
What's with the labels, man?
The schism today in the GOP is because of the GOPers that still think conservatives are not rational
Goldwater made his stand on less government and state's rights at the same time LBJ was pushing civil rights and state's rights were a code word for keeping Jim Crow. Hence, conservatives are racist, still the playbook after all these years.