I wanna be a Husky Beatwriter for a day.
Comments
-
Are you getting paid by the letter, Tequilla???volcanodawg said:yes, depth on the DL is an issue. we've covered that a lot. welcome to HH. it's truly alarming we're here at this stage in year 5. even the most basic fucktard doog should see this as a concern. that's on sark and that's case closed. there is some promising youth in the fold which is nice...but we know one how that saying goes. let it play out. however, with the true criticism out of the way, re: the actual product on the field...i actually have seen some bright spots.
i beg to ask the simplest of simple questions....but when you watched these last two games could you not see #71? He was fucking disruptive in both games and played mean. he is a bad motherfucker. all over the field, making plays, creating opportunities for LBs and causing total havoc anywhere he goes. his 15yd PF penalty vs illinois was bullshit, qb was still in bounds (imo, he was way more in bounds than out of bounds with the threat to juke upfiled) and shelton fucking clocked him. when football was football, that is as clean as clean gets. today it's different, especially with qbs, and yes i guess technically he should know that and not have hit him. but fuck, i'd rather have 11 danny shelton mentalities running around than anything passive. if i am head coach, and if any opponent is inbounds, or intending to juke on the sideline, you are getting hit. imo, keep making that play, somethings are just worth it and to me that screams yes. install some fear in the opponent for a change.
and with that said, every team would love two danny shelton's in the middle, but that rarely happens. check the facts. evan hudson is actually a pretty decent interior guy vs the run. clogs up space and plays pretty low. could/should there be someone better than a walk on converted TE as your #2 DT at this juncture in sark's career, yes that's obvious. but watching the games....he hasn't looked too out of place vs the run. vs the pass, not much of anything outside of a stalemate happens, so that's an obvious downside. wilcox has actually used a lot of interior LB blitzes that have gotten to the qb, and in some capacity disrupted the play. if every team could create havoc solely with their front 4, there would have to be more Alabama's created because those kids that can do that effectively aren't exactly plentiful in nature. trying to be somewhat objective here.
Kikaha shows up and plays with great tenacity and strength. I see him only getting better as his confidence builds. His ceiling is super high if his body is right and he surely knows where the weight room is, so he's taking the right precautions. Shirley is what he is, which is a pretty serviceable pass rusher who has the #'s to prove it. he's looked good so far for what he's asked to do. littleton has shown flashes of tenacious effort and great speed. joe mathis is lost and playing on pure athletic ability, but you can easily see his upside is through the roof.
beyond that, it gets murky from what i've witnessed. not a lot of real standouts from my novice early take. okay way too tequila. -
By the character. Probably had periods, commas, hyphens, and symbols in his contract.ThomasFremont said:
Are you getting paid by the letter, Tequilla???volcanodawg said:yes, depth on the DL is an issue. we've covered that a lot. welcome to HH. it's truly alarming we're here at this stage in year 5. even the most basic fucktard doog should see this as a concern. that's on sark and that's case closed. there is some promising youth in the fold which is nice...but we know one how that saying goes. let it play out. however, with the true criticism out of the way, re: the actual product on the field...i actually have seen some bright spots.
i beg to ask the simplest of simple questions....but when you watched these last two games could you not see #71? He was fucking disruptive in both games and played mean. he is a bad motherfucker. all over the field, making plays, creating opportunities for LBs and causing total havoc anywhere he goes. his 15yd PF penalty vs illinois was bullshit, qb was still in bounds (imo, he was way more in bounds than out of bounds with the threat to juke upfiled) and shelton fucking clocked him. when football was football, that is as clean as clean gets. today it's different, especially with qbs, and yes i guess technically he should know that and not have hit him. but fuck, i'd rather have 11 danny shelton mentalities running around than anything passive. if i am head coach, and if any opponent is inbounds, or intending to juke on the sideline, you are getting hit. imo, keep making that play, somethings are just worth it and to me that screams yes. install some fear in the opponent for a change.
and with that said, every team would love two danny shelton's in the middle, but that rarely happens. check the facts. evan hudson is actually a pretty decent interior guy vs the run. clogs up space and plays pretty low. could/should there be someone better than a walk on converted TE as your #2 DT at this juncture in sark's career, yes that's obvious. but watching the games....he hasn't looked too out of place vs the run. vs the pass, not much of anything outside of a stalemate happens, so that's an obvious downside. wilcox has actually used a lot of interior LB blitzes that have gotten to the qb, and in some capacity disrupted the play. if every team could create havoc solely with their front 4, there would have to be more Alabama's created because those kids that can do that effectively aren't exactly plentiful in nature. trying to be somewhat objective here.
Kikaha shows up and plays with great tenacity and strength. I see him only getting better as his confidence builds. His ceiling is super high if his body is right and he surely knows where the weight room is, so he's taking the right precautions. Shirley is what he is, which is a pretty serviceable pass rusher who has the #'s to prove it. he's looked good so far for what he's asked to do. littleton has shown flashes of tenacious effort and great speed. joe mathis is lost and playing on pure athletic ability, but you can easily see his upside is through the roof.
beyond that, it gets murky from what i've witnessed. not a lot of real standouts from my novice early take. okay way too tequila. -
