PM to Race Bannon
Comments
-
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point. -
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense. -
They actually went something like 33-2 with all three healthy in the lineup last year. That's really our only sampleallpurpleallgold said:
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense. -
But this game doesn't matter, come on man where's the respect.RaceBannon said:
They actually went something like 33-2 with all three healthy in the lineup last year. That's really our only sampleallpurpleallgold said:
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense. -
2-3 without them in the Finals. Then got blown the fuck out by 35 at home with all of them this season. True, GS is better now.RaceBannon said:
They actually went something like 33-2 with all three healthy in the lineup last year. That's really our only sampleallpurpleallgold said:
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense.
You would think they'd be a lot better with Love and Irving but they aren't....at least when it comes to playing the best team in the league. -
I think the theory that they're better without Love may have some merit, but the idea they're better without Kyrie is really FS.
-
It doesn't matter. The Lakers lost game 1 of the finals by more than that margin one year and won the series.
Great in season natty as always -
That's two different arguments and some all pro pressingdoogsinparadise said:
But this game doesn't matter, come on man where's the respect.RaceBannon said:
They actually went something like 33-2 with all three healthy in the lineup last year. That's really our only sampleallpurpleallgold said:
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense. -
Race beats the drum of regular season means nothing harder than anyone. But if you're going to start talking about them being better without Love and Irving the regular season sample is basically all we have. That's why its fucking stupid to say the Finals showed they're better without them.doogsinparadise said:
But this game doesn't matter, come on man where's the respect.RaceBannon said:
They actually went something like 33-2 with all three healthy in the lineup last year. That's really our only sampleallpurpleallgold said:
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense. -
I was not one of the idiots that said that they're better without Love and Irving. Maybe better without Love, maybe. I was just pointing out that it's dumb to minimize the plungering the other night in light of what they did last year at full strength.allpurpleallgold said:
Race beats the drum of regular season means nothing harder than anyone. But if you're going to start talking about them being better without Love and Irving the regular season sample is basically all we have. That's why its fucking stupid to say the Finals showed they're better without them.doogsinparadise said:
But this game doesn't matter, come on man where's the respect.RaceBannon said:
They actually went something like 33-2 with all three healthy in the lineup last year. That's really our only sampleallpurpleallgold said:
And then they lost 3 straight.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
They won the next 2 games without Irving.allpurpleallgold said:
Yeah they looked like shit in game 1 with Irving. He certainly didn't go toe to toe with Curry and block his shot in the last 30 seconds.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Cleveland played its best last year in the finals without Love and Irving on the floor. Guys like Mozgov, Thompson and Delly gave the contributions they needed (defense, rebounding, toughness) that Love and Irving lack.RoadDawg55 said:I would be curious how many NBA champions were blown out by 34 at home.
There was no reason for Cleveland not to be fired up. The problem for them is Golden State is getting better. Green and Curry are both quite a bit better from last year.
Cleveland isn't. Love is one of the biggest losers in the league. Irving gets hurt every year. Even LeBron has slipped a little. He's played a lot of years and a ton of games.
In most years you need 2 stars to win a title. Irving and Love aren't even close. They arent even all stars.
His strong game 1 and 1 block doesn't mitigate my point.
This narrative is stupid. They played 0 games that mattered with Love and 1 with Irving and in that one he/they played well. How the fuck would you know they played better without them when they didn't play any games with them? It's fucking nonsense.
