It's always weird how people find articles that agree with them to be "good reads".
I don't remember Han Solo's son killing him in the first movie, which is weird since it's a shot for shot remake. Maybe if he spent more of the article explaining why the movie is bad I'd understand. Instead he launches into a diatribe about Disney making money off toys.
The idea that now is when Star Wars has been compromised is a joke. Anyone that knows anything knows George Lucas sold Star Wars' soul during he first trilogy. So you can lament about how things aren't as good as they use to be but that just makes you an old man.
Comments
So I clicked to see what is it good for.
And I found absolutely nothing
I don't remember Han Solo's son killing him in the first movie, which is weird since it's a shot for shot remake. Maybe if he spent more of the article explaining why the movie is bad I'd understand. Instead he launches into a diatribe about Disney making money off toys.
The idea that now is when Star Wars has been compromised is a joke. Anyone that knows anything knows George Lucas sold Star Wars' soul during he first trilogy. So you can lament about how things aren't as good as they use to be but that just makes you an old man.
Nailed!!!