Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

oregon's next qb

245

Comments

  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited December 2015
    Mosster47 said:

    MisterEm said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Passion said:

    Is now playing for Georgia southern. Since the trash can't develop their own QB, they should consider this kid that is running all over bowling green on espn.

    Leave it to a Doog. Oregon recruits and develops a Heisman QB last season and now they can't develop QB's.

    Great work with Brownshorts this year. 6-6 is always special.
    You sound defensive on a rival's fringe message bored.

    Do you hate your time?
    I'm watching the Raiders gear up to lose in overtime after an epic comeback. My time is unimportant like yours.
    Your* still here? Passive aggressive quook on a doog bored is speshul.

    Stick to blowing RichRod. You suck at this.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,254 Standard Supporter
    ntxduck said:

    Doog potd

    Given trends, is he wrong? Who brings in one year ringers continually?
  • blackmamba
    blackmamba Member Posts: 184

    ntxduck said:

    Doog potd

    Given trends, is he wrong? Who brings in one year ringers continually?
    alabama
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    ntxduck said:

    Doog potd

    Given trends, is he wrong? Who brings in one year ringers continually?
    Who gives a fuck?

    Who's lead exactly should Oregon be following in the QB development department?

    Waiting on the long list of programs. You have until next Christmas...

    GO!


  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Mosster47 said:

    Passion said:

    Is now playing for Georgia southern. Since the trash can't develop their own QB, they should consider this kid that is running all over bowling green on espn.

    Leave it to a Doog. Oregon recruits and develops a Heisman QB last season and now they can't develop QB's.

    Great work with Brownshorts this year. 6-6 is always special.
    When did Oregon have time to develop Vag? Did he even show up to practice before the first game?

    Luke Huard gets the credit for developing the benchwarmer that scored 58 yesterday. Maybe Oregon can hire him?
  • RaccoonHarry
    RaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    edited December 2015

    ntxduck said:

    Doog potd

    Given trends, is he wrong? Who brings in one year ringers continually?
    Who gives a fuck?

    Who's lead exactly should Oregon be following in the QB development department?

    Waiting on the long list of programs. You have until next Christmas...

    GO!


    Exactly. And I believe only ONE of the Oregon QB's who have beat Washington in TWELVE consecutive years has been a one year transfer. If Prukop wins the starting job, and leads them to a win next year at Autzen, he'll be the second. I like the fact that most on this board can (grudgingly) appreciate a program that WANTS TO WIN. What a concept.
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793

    Fenwick said:

    ^ Locker and Price were rendered undeveloped by Sarkisian unfortunately


    Frankly, he was just a more hyped Lindy.
    So your saying that with more hype, Lindy could have been a 1st round pick?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    The doogish shit about Oregon's QB's needs to stop. A little ribbing, okay fine, but to bury your head in the sand and not understand what is going on... Kim has a website where they would eat it up.

    Oregon is serious about winning and wants to win now. If Waller (Jonson now?) is better than the Prokup he will start. I doubt that's the case, but bringing in Prukop is hardly a negative.

    Oregon is hedging their bets by bringing in a supposedly talented QB that other elite schools also wanted.

    Oregon is obviously using the free agent system to heir advantage, but it's not inaccurate to say that they're only doing so because their current qbs aren't very impressive.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    The doogish shit about Oregon's QB's needs to stop. A little ribbing, okay fine, but to bury your head in the sand and not understand what is going on... Kim has a website where they would eat it up.

    Oregon is serious about winning and wants to win now. If Waller (Jonson now?) is better than the Prokup he will start. I doubt that's the case, but bringing in Prukop is hardly a negative.

    Oregon is hedging their bets by bringing in a supposedly talented QB that other elite schools also wanted.

    Oregon is obviously using the free agent system to heir advantage, but it's not inaccurate to say that they're only doing so because their current qbs aren't very impressive.
    Who knows, they might have someone who is good. What's the hurt in adding a good QB? Last year the Ducks had nothing. Lets say this year Prukop starts and Jonson is also really good or maybe Mahalak is ready to step up. Unlike this year, the season wouldn't fall apart (by Oregon's standards) because Prukop broke a finger and needed to sit three games.

    Wisconsin made a Rose Bowl with Russ Wilson on a one year deal. It's a smart move. It's the most important position on your team and if you have a guy that's better than the one you have knocking on the door you answer. Nick Saban wanted Prukop too and Doogs love him.