Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Reading the Twatter Leaves, David Long Edition

24

Comments

  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that the AP didn't start picking a national champ until 1936. Most of Michigan's titles were before that. Michigan has only won the AP poll twice since then, 1997 and 1948. They split a title in 1947. They aren't elite and never have been. B level like us, but never top tier A level. Losing record in the Rose Bowl, as well. They are closer to Princeton and Yale territory, but they've actually had recent success.

    ybe, sfj
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    godawgst said:

    Long is liking a lot of Michigan tweets lately and no UW tweets. I think we might be trailing for his terrific hips right now.

    That's all, thanks for reading.

    Michigan is a Mount Rushmore program (when they have the right guy), who has a Mount Rushmore CFB coach in Harbaugh. Plus for kids in northern California, Jim would be a legend as they were growing up.

    If he had to pick today, Long would be a wolverine, but I still think he will be a dawg come signing day.

    CFB Mount Rushmore

    USC, Notre Dame, BAMA, fourth spot is debateable but it's either Oklahoma, Nebraska or Ohio State.

    Michigan is not on the CFB Rushmore. Maybe on the CFB Stone Mountain. Harbaugh is on the Rushmore of current coaches though.
    The all-time winningest program isn't on the CFB Mt Rushmore?
    How many national titles has Michigan won?
    Eleven.
    They've won one since Race was born.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,005 Founders Club
    USC Bama Ohio State Notre Dame

    Oklahoma

    Elite means elite.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    I agree with @godawgst on Long.

    He probably loves UW but its hard to turn down a chance to play for Harbaugh, arguably the best coach in the world not named Pete Carroll.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,286 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that the AP didn't start picking a national champ until 1936. Most of Michigan's titles were before that. Michigan has only won the AP poll twice since then, 1997 and 1948. They split a title in 1947. They aren't elite and never have been. B level like us, but never top tier A level. Losing record in the Rose Bowl, as well. They are closer to Princeton and Yale territory, but they've actually had recent success.

    Voted up for overall poast, they're a clear step above us(?) though.
    Disagree. We're dead even historically.
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    mods, can we take this to the NOGAF bored?
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746
    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that the AP didn't start picking a national champ until 1936. Most of Michigan's titles were before that. Michigan has only won the AP poll twice since then, 1997 and 1948. They split a title in 1947. They aren't elite and never have been. B level like us, but never top tier A level. Losing record in the Rose Bowl, as well. They are closer to Princeton and Yale territory, but they've actually had recent success.

    Voted up for overall poast, they're a clear step above us(?) though.
    Disagree. We're dead even historically.
    In what?
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that the AP didn't start picking a national champ until 1936. Most of Michigan's titles were before that. Michigan has only won the AP poll twice since then, 1997 and 1948. They split a title in 1947. They aren't elite and never have been. B level like us, but never top tier A level. Losing record in the Rose Bowl, as well. They are closer to Princeton and Yale territory, but they've actually had recent success.

    Voted up for overall poast, they're a clear step above us(?) though.
    Disagree. We're dead even historically.
    In what?
    Academis.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,286 Founders Club
    edited December 2015
    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that the AP didn't start picking a national champ until 1936. Most of Michigan's titles were before that. Michigan has only won the AP poll twice since then, 1997 and 1948. They split a title in 1947. They aren't elite and never have been. B level like us, but never top tier A level. Losing record in the Rose Bowl, as well. They are closer to Princeton and Yale territory, but they've actually had recent success.

    Voted up for overall poast, they're a clear step above us(?) though.
    Disagree. We're dead even historically.
    In what?
    Football.

    Let's compare.

    UW: 1 natty in AP era (could claim more)
    Michigan: 2 natty in AP era

    Rose Bowels
    UW: 7-6-1
    Michigan: 8-12

    In the big picture we are very even. Michigan gets an edge due to not having 0-12, and having more recent success, but in terms of big wins we are pretty even.

  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,747 Swaye's Wigwam
    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that the AP didn't start picking a national champ until 1936. Most of Michigan's titles were before that. Michigan has only won the AP poll twice since then, 1997 and 1948. They split a title in 1947. They aren't elite and never have been. B level like us, but never top tier A level. Losing record in the Rose Bowl, as well. They are closer to Princeton and Yale territory, but they've actually had recent success.

    Voted up for overall poast, they're a clear step above us(?) though.
    Disagree. We're dead even historically.
    In what?
    Football.

    Let's compare.

    UW: 1 natty in AP era (could claim more)
    Michigan: 2 natty in AP era

    Rose Bowels
    UW: 7-6-1
    Michigan: 8-12

    In the big picture we are very even. Michigan gets an edge due to not having 0-12, and having more recent success, but in terms of big wins we are pretty even.

    Michigan is Minnesota?
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798
    edited December 2015
    Gladstone said:

    ...Elite verdict? No.

    image

    Michigan is #1 in all-time wins and #2 in all-time winning percentage. Their claim to 11 national championships is stronger than UW's claim to 2. They've even won one during current players' lifetimes.

    image

    If Michigan's not elite, ain't nobody elite.
  • HelfrichFamilyVanHelfrichFamilyVan Member Posts: 351
    TTJ said:

    Gladstone said:

    ...Elite verdict? No.

    image

    Michigan is #1 in all-time wins and #2 in all-time winning percentage. Their claim to 11 national championships is stronger than UW's claim to 2. They've even won one during current players' lifetimes.

    image

    If Michigan's not elite, ain't nobody elite.
    I tried that line of reasoning already, the bored was displeased with my offering.
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,283
    This thread sucks
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,286 Founders Club
    Losing record in the Rose Bowl. 9 of 11 championships were in the pre-AP era. Fuck off. They ain't elite.
  • HelfrichFamilyVanHelfrichFamilyVan Member Posts: 351

    This thread sucks

    Thanks for reading ;)
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,005 Founders Club
    Miami is more elite than Michigan
Sign In or Register to comment.