Can someone explain to me why a primary in which there is about a 0.1% chance that the DNC nominates someone other than Hillary is on network TV? There's no drama to this at all. Instead, all it really does is further cement the idea that there is a liberal leaning media bias.
Can someone explain to me why a primary in which there is about a 0.1% chance that the DNC nominates someone other than Hillary is on network TV? There's no drama to this at all. Instead, all it really does is further cement the idea that there is a liberal leaning media bias.
Liberal leaning.... bagging on the most liberal candidate in Sanders? Got it.
Can someone explain to me why a primary in which there is about a 0.1% chance that the DNC nominates someone other than Hillary is on network TV? There's no drama to this at all. Instead, all it really does is further cement the idea that there is a liberal leaning media bias.
Even in a lost cause for Sanders and O'Malley it gets Hilary on record on issues, as well as providing better debate prep for the general than what she would get from some limp dick staffer. I thought the debate on how to deal with ISIS was actually pretty interesting in how you could see the divide between the two wings of the DP. Also, why do you hate Hilary saying "maybe the back door is the wrong door."
Can someone explain to me why a primary in which there is about a 0.1% chance that the DNC nominates someone other than Hillary is on network TV? There's no drama to this at all. Instead, all it really does is further cement the idea that there is a liberal leaning media bias.
Liberal leaning.... bagging on the most liberal candidate in Sanders? Got it.
Comments
The republican debates are far more entertaining given the amount of contention and uncertainty