Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

General Thoughts

13

Comments

  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    C+ b/c of the two turnovers and 543 penalties. Secondary had too many blown coverages also. A very good or great team would have put their boots on the Illini throats... or scalped them or whatever analogy you like when it was 31-10

    And thats what this season comes down to. Sark & his staff have to take what we have now and turn it into a very good or great team as the season progresses. That means its competitive in every game and blows away average teams at home and on the road.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,367 Founders Club
    edited September 2013
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    Not sure how I feel about the D.

    Thoughts???

    Saw some good things (especially pass rush), but the run defense and pass coverage was spotty at times.

    I'd give them a B- for this game. Overall, LIFPO.
    I'd give them a C, and I don't want to hear another word about how great Wilcox is. The jury is out. Those fucks brought back bad memories of last year's Apple Cup. Best advice on the bored, LIFPO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WhiskeyDawg
    WhiskeyDawg Member Posts: 406
    jecornel said:

    ASJ is not in football shape....needs to drop weight

    Agreed. He looked like a fat tub of goo. #beerbelly

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    edited September 2013
    This was a C performance:
    - Good to great skill players except for fatso Jenkins.
    - Decent O line play
    - Overall, Sloppy
    - Undisciplined
    - Marginal intensity
    - Blown coverages
    - Poor D line play
    - C play calling......still too many dumb calls. (This grade is a big improvement for Shark.)

    This team is a little better than last year it appears. However, Oregon will ass rape this squad.

    I still see an 8 - 4 team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • surfpup
    surfpup Member Posts: 34
    IrishDawg22 said:

    Sankey is really fucking good (All American/Doak Walker good)

    A healthy Keith Price who gets time to throw is a REALLY dangerous weapon

    Oline continues to look much better in this hurry up

    Sark needs to fix these fucking penalties 12 for 102 is unacceptable. No improvement from last year

    Sankey needs to be option 1 in the RZ

    Callier had a nice game, and Washington was a MAJOR disappointment, especially after his good performance against BSU

    How do you only score 34 with over 600 yds offense?

    Never felt so dirty after a 10pt road win.


    Spot on

    3 passes in the RZ had me screaming.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Steve_Bowman said:

    This was a C performance:
    - Good to great skill players except for fatso Jenkins.
    - Decent O line play
    - Overall, Sloppy
    - Undisciplined
    - Marginal intensity
    - Blown coverages
    - Poor D line play
    - C play calling......still too many dumb calls. (This grade is a big improvement for Shark.)

    This is team is a little better than last year it appears. However, Oregon will ass rape this squad.

    I still see an 8 - 4 team.

    7-5. Bowl loss. 7-6.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    In this thread: A lot of doogs, but Irish isn't one of them.

    IrishDawg isn't reaching IMALOSER territory in this thread.




    confused

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,367 Founders Club
    The doog overtones in this thread are a little disturbing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    edited September 2013
    So what are the doog overtones?

    Does giving the Dawgs a C for their half ass performance make you a doog?
    Southerndawg said:

    The doog overtones in this thread are a little disturbing.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,367 Founders Club
    Steve_Bowman said:

    So what are the doog overtones?
    Does giving the Dawgs a C for their half ass performance make you a doog?

    Southerndawg said:

    The doog overtones in this thread are a little disturbing.

    Obviously a failed attempt at sarkasm. I agree with most in this thread. Things I found most concerning were the defense damn near choking the game away, the fucking penalties, and an offense that racks up 600 yards with only 34 points to show for it. That makes two in a row for the offense not producing points to match yards gained. This team still has the potential to get its ass blown out by better competition.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter