Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

General Thoughts

2»

Comments

  • Options
    HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment

    C+ b/c of the two turnovers and 543 penalties. Secondary had too many blown coverages also. A very good or great team would have put their boots on the Illini throats... or scalped them or whatever analogy you like when it was 31-10

    And thats what this season comes down to. Sark & his staff have to take what we have now and turn it into a very good or great team as the season progresses. That means its competitive in every game and blows away average teams at home and on the road.
  • Options
    SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,233
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club
    edited September 2013

    Not sure how I feel about the D.

    Thoughts???

    Saw some good things (especially pass rush), but the run defense and pass coverage was spotty at times.

    I'd give them a B- for this game. Overall, LIFPO.
    I'd give them a C, and I don't want to hear another word about how great Wilcox is. The jury is out. Those fucks brought back bad memories of last year's Apple Cup. Best advice on the bored, LIFPO.
  • Options
    WhiskeyDawgWhiskeyDawg Member Posts: 406
    5 Awesomes Name Dropper First Anniversary 5 Up Votes
    jecornel said:

    ASJ is not in football shape....needs to drop weight

    Agreed. He looked like a fat tub of goo. #beerbelly

  • Options
    Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Testing 1
    edited September 2013
    This was a C performance:
    - Good to great skill players except for fatso Jenkins.
    - Decent O line play
    - Overall, Sloppy
    - Undisciplined
    - Marginal intensity
    - Blown coverages
    - Poor D line play
    - C play calling......still too many dumb calls. (This grade is a big improvement for Shark.)

    This team is a little better than last year it appears. However, Oregon will ass rape this squad.

    I still see an 8 - 4 team.
  • Options
    surfpupsurfpup Member Posts: 34
    First Anniversary Photogenic First Comment 5 Up Votes

    Sankey is really fucking good (All American/Doak Walker good)

    A healthy Keith Price who gets time to throw is a REALLY dangerous weapon

    Oline continues to look much better in this hurry up

    Sark needs to fix these fucking penalties 12 for 102 is unacceptable. No improvement from last year

    Sankey needs to be option 1 in the RZ

    Callier had a nice game, and Washington was a MAJOR disappointment, especially after his good performance against BSU

    How do you only score 34 with over 600 yds offense?

    Never felt so dirty after a 10pt road win.


    Spot on

    3 passes in the RZ had me screaming.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    This was a C performance:
    - Good to great skill players except for fatso Jenkins.
    - Decent O line play
    - Overall, Sloppy
    - Undisciplined
    - Marginal intensity
    - Blown coverages
    - Poor D line play
    - C play calling......still too many dumb calls. (This grade is a big improvement for Shark.)

    This is team is a little better than last year it appears. However, Oregon will ass rape this squad.

    I still see an 8 - 4 team.

    7-5. Bowl loss. 7-6.
  • Options
    CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,493
    First Anniversary 5 Fuck Offs 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    In this thread: A lot of doogs, but Irish isn't one of them.

    IrishDawg isn't reaching IMALOSER territory in this thread.




    confused

  • Options
    SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,233
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club
    The doog overtones in this thread are a little disturbing.
  • Options
    Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Testing 1
    edited September 2013
    So what are the doog overtones?

    Does giving the Dawgs a C for their half ass performance make you a doog?

    The doog overtones in this thread are a little disturbing.

  • Options
    SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,233
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club

    So what are the doog overtones?
    Does giving the Dawgs a C for their half ass performance make you a doog?

    The doog overtones in this thread are a little disturbing.

    Obviously a failed attempt at sarkasm. I agree with most in this thread. Things I found most concerning were the defense damn near choking the game away, the fucking penalties, and an offense that racks up 600 yards with only 34 points to show for it. That makes two in a row for the offense not producing points to match yards gained. This team still has the potential to get its ass blown out by better competition.
  • Options
    Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Testing 1
    It was a typical doog performance......lack luster.

    There will be blow outs.
Sign In or Register to comment.