Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Time to throw a bouquet of flowers to price

jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
in Hardcore Husky Board
28-35 342yds 2 tds

HI HUGH!!!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • LevelParLevelPar Member Posts: 447
    Leave Dewey alone
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748
    No way I can take Price over Tui, Hobert or Brunell.

    He's in the tier right after that though, which is still a pretty strong tier.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    dnc said:

    No way I can take Price over Tui, Hobert or Brunell.

    He's in the tier right after that though, which is still a pretty strong tier.

    Brunell tends to get a little overrated because of what he did in the NFL. He was good in 1990 but that was a stacked team and his completion was under 50% that year. Wasn't really a factor in 1991 and in 1992 the team kind of went to shit once Hobert was booted.

    I'm a huge Brunnell fan but just saying. Agree on Tui and Hobert though.

    If you still think Locker is better than Price I'll just come out and say it you are a racist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,070 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    No way I can take Price over Tui, Hobert or Brunell.

    He's in the tier right after that though, which is still a pretty strong tier.

    IMO, not fair to compare Toofuses against Hobert or Brunell because they played for teams that were infinitely more talented and better coached than this team.

    Tui is still No. 1 in my book.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    No way I can take Price over Tui, Hobert or Brunell.

    He's in the tier right after that though, which is still a pretty strong tier.

    Price is definitely better than Brunell (a personal favorite of mine by the way).

    In terms of QB rating, Price is the best ever:
    http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/passing.html

    I know everyone throws now and it's easier to pass, so I'm not going to say Price is clearly the best Husky QB ever.

    He belongs somewhere in the conversation, though winning a BCS bowl and popping off would help his case a ton.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencavemanunfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    Hobert had a lot of natural talent and was surrounded by great talent/coaching, he just didn't like to read the playbook...Buffalo Bills :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Price I believe would have led the Huskies to a 10 win season had he been the QB during the 1994-1997 stretch where the Huards were clearly holding our program back(Along with Lambo).

    Price is accurate, can make plays downfield, and plays smart. I never did get why Doogs hated on him after worshipping and defending Lockner for four years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,070 Swaye's Wigwam
    Comparing Price to either Huard is like comparing Emptermmannnn to Shelton
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,499 Founders Club
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Price I believe would have led the Huskies to a 10 win season had he been the QB during the 1994-1997 stretch where the Huards were clearly holding our program back(Along with Lambo).

    Price is accurate, can make plays downfield, and plays smart. I never did get why Doogs hated on him after worshipping and defending Lockner for four years.

    Doogs are fucking retards and Kim told them it was Price's fault to deflect blame from Sark so he could continue to suck him off and get Fetters Nachos discounts at games. Case closed.

    KP was never the problem. In fact, outside of Tui, I would say just about the best damn QB ever at this school, and that is saying something. Last year was a broke dick O line and miserable play calling/QB management by Sark, nothing more, nothing less.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Swaye said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Price I believe would have led the Huskies to a 10 win season had he been the QB during the 1994-1997 stretch where the Huards were clearly holding our program back(Along with Lambo).

    Price is accurate, can make plays downfield, and plays smart. I never did get why Doogs hated on him after worshipping and defending Lockner for four years.

    Doogs are fucking retards and Kim told them it was Price's fault to deflect blame from Sark so he could continue to suck him off and get Fetters Nachos discounts at games. Case closed.

    KP was never the problem. In fact, outside of Tui, I would say just about the best damn QB ever at this school, and that is saying something. Last year was a broke dick O line and miserable play calling/QB management by Sark, nothing more, nothing less.
    Not only bad OL but poor WR's as well. Like in 2011, just like now Price has solid WR's and a decent OL and you are seeing the results.

    On the year now Price is 51-66(77.2%) with 668 yards(10.1 YPA) with 4 TD's and only 1 INT.

    Locker couldn't get that completion percentage if he played against High Schoolers right now, or reach that passing total in 3 games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.