Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hey Bleenor...

I thought you were smarter than everyone else because your superior analytics said there's no way our defense gives up over 17 points?

Comments

  • Hopefully this game finally puts away the myth that Wilcox should be our next head coach.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748

    Hopefully this game finally puts away the myth that Wilcox should be our next head coach.

    I don't think you crown Wilcox after this game, but I thought the defense played fairly well. Illinois completed 10 passes in 26 attempts and ran for 3.8 ypc. 24 points on 11 possessions is not terrible.

    Illinois is a much better offensive team than defensive. If anything was disappointing today it was our offense, not the defense.

  • Our defense didn't look good at all. They dropped two TD's and dropped a crucial third down.

    Plus their coach is a fucking idiot! He managed to outSark Sark in this game.

    I'm not saying to fire Wilcox but hopefully this game puts away this silly notion he's head coach quality.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748
    edited September 2013

    Our defense didn't look good at all. They dropped two TD's and dropped a crucial third down.

    Plus their coach is a fucking idiot! He managed to outSark Sark in this game.

    I'm not saying to fire Wilcox but hopefully this game puts away this silly notion he's head coach quality.

    I'm not campaigning for Wilcox but I think he's a worthy candidate. One game doesn't prove anything one way or the other. And certainly not this game, this was a decent, not great, not terrible game.

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748
    Boobs said it best in another thread "Saw some good things (especially pass rush), but the run defense and pass coverage was spotty at times.

    I'd give them a B- for this game. Overall, LIFPO."

    You don't hire a coach who's a B- on an regular basis. But posting a B- game in no way disqualifies someone from being an HC. Every coach has games worse than this.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    Hopefully this game finally puts away the myth that Wilcox should be our next head coach.

    I don't think you crown Wilcox after this game, but I thought the defense played fairly well. Illinois completed 10 passes in 26 attempts and ran for 3.8 ypc. 24 points on 11 possessions is not terrible.

    Illinois is a much better offensive team than defensive. If anything was disappointing today it was our offense, not the defense.

    Totally disagree, based on last year's data:
    http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?year=2012&org=301

    Too early to judge this year...even though the trends favor your position.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748

    dnc said:

    Hopefully this game finally puts away the myth that Wilcox should be our next head coach.

    I don't think you crown Wilcox after this game, but I thought the defense played fairly well. Illinois completed 10 passes in 26 attempts and ran for 3.8 ypc. 24 points on 11 possessions is not terrible.

    Illinois is a much better offensive team than defensive. If anything was disappointing today it was our offense, not the defense.

    Totally disagree, based on last year's data:
    http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?year=2012&org=301

    Too early to judge this year...even though the trends favor your position.
    lipo?

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    Hopefully this game finally puts away the myth that Wilcox should be our next head coach.

    I don't think you crown Wilcox after this game, but I thought the defense played fairly well. Illinois completed 10 passes in 26 attempts and ran for 3.8 ypc. 24 points on 11 possessions is not terrible.

    Illinois is a much better offensive team than defensive. If anything was disappointing today it was our offense, not the defense.

    Totally disagree, based on last year's data:
    http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?year=2012&org=301

    Too early to judge this year...even though the trends favor your position.
    lipo?

    liposuction, as always
  • dnc said:

    Boobs said it best in another thread "Saw some good things (especially pass rush), but the run defense and pass coverage was spotty at times.

    I'd give them a B- for this game. Overall, LIFPO."

    You don't hire a coach who's a B- on an regular basis. But posting a B- game in no way disqualifies someone from being an HC. Every coach has games worse than this.

    dnc said:

    Boobs said it best in another thread "Saw some good things (especially pass rush), but the run defense and pass coverage was spotty at times.

    I'd give them a B- for this game. Overall, LIFPO."

    You don't hire a coach who's a B- on an regular basis. But posting a B- game in no way disqualifies someone from being an HC. Every coach has games worse than this.

    Also when I say Wilcox isn't a head coach I'm talking right now for a big time school. Like if Pool Boy fired Sark or Sark left to the NFL(HA!) I'd be pissed off if they promoted Wilcox to HC.

    I really don't want to go through this whole "he's learning on the job" bullshit again.
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748
    TTJ said:

    dnciryk

    always nice to carry the al qaeda vote

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,499 Founders Club
    I'm pretty sure this needs to be moved to a higher discussion board.
Sign In or Register to comment.