Losing Rawls is devastating
Comments
-
Next man up
-
Nope, it means more reliance on passing gameRaceBannon said:Next man up
-
Why are you worried about Arizona?
There are 2 games before then ...
Handle your business the next 2 weeks and the Arizona game probably doesn't even matter.
So unless Rawls has an injury that is more than 3-4 week injury, it probably won't matter too much. -
Rawls is on IR.Tequilla said:Why are you worried about Arizona?
There are 2 games before then ...
Handle your business the next 2 weeks and the Arizona game probably doesn't even matter.
So unless Rawls has an injury that is more than 3-4 week injury, it probably won't matter too much. -
I don't think Cleveland and St Louis are going to be a problem. By the time we play Arizona, Lynch might be ready to go.
-
-
RSIOTequilla said:Why are you worried about Arizona?
There are 2 games before then ...
Handle your business the next 2 weeks and the Arizona game probably doesn't even matter.
So unless Rawls has an injury that is more than 3-4 week injury, it probably won't matter too much. -
I'd disagree and say the difference will be if the defense defends the pass better or not.DerekJohnson said:Could mean the difference between winning and losing vs Arizona
-
That's a significant blow ...SteveInShelton said:
Rawls is on IR.Tequilla said:Why are you worried about Arizona?
There are 2 games before then ...
Handle your business the next 2 weeks and the Arizona game probably doesn't even matter.
So unless Rawls has an injury that is more than 3-4 week injury, it probably won't matter too much.
Offense will be very pass happy now going forward ... definitely need Lynch to get healthy at some point. -
Remember that Rawls was a UFA. Not a nothing loss but if they find someone who fits the blocking scheme I think they can get by
