Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend: --
(1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse[.] (Emphasis added.)
For many months I have ignored the Libelous and Slanderous things said about me. No more.
One thing about being a retired attorney whose license is in suspension because I don't want to keep paying about a thousand dollars a year for "continuing education" and Bar dues, is I have plenty of time to devote to one pro se lawsuit.
I don't need to pay an attorney to represent me if I want to sue somebody, I can simply file it pro se. In this case it would be a John Doe(s) law suit against certain persons' screen name, and I would then amend the suit later with the your real name once I inspected Derek's records during discovery.
There's an old saying that the most dangerous attorney is the one with only one case and lots of time on his hands. I guess that would describe me.
Although I did not specialize in Libel Slander, I have represented three plaintiffs regarding Libel Slander. I won all three, and none were as clear cut as this. There is clearly malice and recklessness in this case. As such, the burden of proof shifts to the DEFENDANT, to prove you aren't libel for damages. By the way, this is BOTH a civil and a criminal statute and the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office owes me a favor.
I like it in here, but I will not be slandered and libeled. Nor will I stand silent as my facebook account is hacked. I am NOT anonymous in here. I have signed several of my posts in dm.com with my real name. Yesterday, I published my picture, (both of which are more than you have).
Knock it off now, or suffer the consequences.
I will not comment on this any further in threads and will instead discuss the matter with Derek.
J: I haven't paid close attention to the spat between you and others. But you've come to this board voluntarily and thus, voluntarily subject yourself to the comments you feel are libelous. Yes, some posters unfamiliar with the legal standards for slander and libel have gone overboard and you have every right to set them straight and fight back should you choose to do so. But playing the Retired Attorney card? Really? There's another, even older saying that "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client." You're displaying very thin skin here, bud. It's like claiming battery after jumping into a mosh pit. As Shakespeare once wrote, Discretion is the better part of valor. Ignore the fuck-heads who doubt you, but why waste your time spilling your emotions and threatening lawsuits? Isn't the beauty of this forum the fact that anything goes? Sticks and stones, bud. This isn't a call-out, btw. Consider it a plea.
J: I haven't paid close attention to the spat between you and others. But you've come to this board voluntarily and thus, voluntarily subject yourself to the comments you feel are libelous. Yes, some posters unfamiliar with the legal standards for slander and libel have gone overboard and you have every right to set them straight and fight back should you choose to do so. But playing the Retired Attorney card? Really? There's another, even older saying that "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client." You're displaying very thin skin here, bud. It's like claiming battery after jumping into a mosh pit. As Shakespeare once wrote, Discretion is the better part of valor. Ignore the fuck-heads who doubt you, but why waste your time spilling your emotions and threatening lawsuits? Isn't the beauty of this forum the fact that anything goes? Sticks and stones, bud. This isn't a call-out, btw. Consider it a plea.
J: I haven't paid close attention to the spat between you and others. But you've come to this board voluntarily and thus, voluntarily subject yourself to the comments you feel are libelous. Yes, some posters unfamiliar with the legal standards for slander and libel have gone overboard and you have every right to set them straight and fight back should you choose to do so. But playing the Retired Attorney card? Really? There's another, even older saying that "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client." You're displaying very thin skin here, bud. It's like claiming battery after jumping into a mosh pit. As Shakespeare once wrote, Discretion is the better part of valor. Ignore the fuck-heads who doubt you, but why waste your time spilling your emotions and threatening lawsuits? Isn't the beauty of this forum the fact that anything goes? Sticks and stones, bud. This isn't a call-out, btw. Consider it a plea.
J: I haven't paid close attention to the spat between you and others. But you've come to this board voluntarily and thus, voluntarily subject yourself to the comments you feel are libelous. Yes, some posters unfamiliar with the legal standards for slander and libel have gone overboard and you have every right to set them straight and fight back should you choose to do so. But playing the Retired Attorney card? Really? There's another, even older saying that "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client." You're displaying very thin skin here, bud. It's like claiming battery after jumping into a mosh pit. As Shakespeare once wrote, Discretion is the better part of valor. Ignore the fuck-heads who doubt you, but why waste your time spilling your emotions and threatening lawsuits? Isn't the beauty of this forum the fact that anything goes? Sticks and stones, bud. This isn't a call-out, btw. Consider it a plea.
Comments
J?
Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend: --
(1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse[.] (Emphasis added.)
For many months I have ignored the Libelous and Slanderous things said about me. No more.
One thing about being a retired attorney whose license is in suspension because I don't want to keep paying about a thousand dollars a year for "continuing education" and Bar dues, is I have plenty of time to devote to one pro se lawsuit.
I don't need to pay an attorney to represent me if I want to sue somebody, I can simply file it pro se. In this case it would be a John Doe(s) law suit against certain persons' screen name, and I would then amend the suit later with the your real name once I inspected Derek's records during discovery.
There's an old saying that the most dangerous attorney is the one with only one case and lots of time on his hands. I guess that would describe me.
Although I did not specialize in Libel Slander, I have represented three plaintiffs regarding Libel Slander. I won all three, and none were as clear cut as this. There is clearly malice and recklessness in this case. As such, the burden of proof shifts to the DEFENDANT, to prove you aren't libel for damages. By the way, this is BOTH a civil and a criminal statute and the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office owes me a favor.
I like it in here, but I will not be slandered and libeled. Nor will I stand silent as my facebook account is hacked. I am NOT anonymous in here. I have signed several of my posts in dm.com with my real name. Yesterday, I published my picture, (both of which are more than you have).
Knock it off now, or suffer the consequences.
I will not comment on this any further in threads and will instead discuss the matter with Derek.
WOOOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/26221/generation-cry-baby-why-millennials-are-a-fucking-joke/p5