USC: Sark is full of shit
Comments
-
The ADA was practically gutted by the Supreme Court years ago. I don't know if it's been amended much since, but CA disability law might be more generous? Maybe I should read the Complaint? Naaaaaaaaaaah. I'll be busy with this instead.
-
Here are the realities:
- in California, the law is written and upheld in court with some basis to the claim.
- Sark's attorneys know he has no money and took this as a 1/3 contingency.
- Sark's attorneys know they won't win in court even with California precedent, they are looking to settle. Settling for $6 million nets them $2 million with little work.
- USC doesn't want a long drawn out legal battle even tho they know they will win. If they do win, Sark won't be able to pay their attorney fees. So they will be enticed to settle.
I figure Sark will net a couple million to sit on his floor (couch is sold) and not do anything. -
2001400ex said:
I figureSarkSarks ex-wife will net a couple million to sit on her couch and not do anything.
SC will probably settle, guy from the LA Times said they have insurance for this sort of thing but on the other hand they and their underwriters may just say FTG and fight it out. Either way it will be interesting. -
If this could get to trial the amount of material we will get is mind boggling.
Dirty laundry, from multiple sources, to the bazillionth degree.
Prayingdog.gif -
I've got pretty good tolerances, but even I would probably tire of the pathetic, nauseous, gory, icky details of Sark's & Haden's lives. Blech. Rather eat my own shit.BayDawg said:If this could get to trial the amount of material we will get is mind boggling.
Dirty laundry, from multiple sources, to the bazillionth degree.
Prayingdog.gif -
Someone ought to write a book about this shit.
-
DerekJohnson said:
Someone ought to write a book about this shit.
-
Is this bad lip reading or was that actually it, and in reference to what? This is an amazing gif, and it has been neatly packed into my bookmarks. Thank you, some beers for you.
GrundleStiltzkin said:CheersWestDawg said:
Actually he's Mr. 20,247 poasts.GrundleStiltzkin said:
"We"? Mr. 248 poasts?WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:We were right.
-
battlefield commission lawyer, now?2001400ex said:Here are the realities:
- in California, the law is written and upheld in court with some basis to the claim.
- Sark's attorneys know he has no money and took this as a 1/3 contingency.
- Sark's attorneys know they won't win in court even with California precedent, they are looking to settle. Settling for $6 million nets them $2 million with little work.
- USC doesn't want a long drawn out legal battle even tho they know they will win. If they do win, Sark won't be able to pay their attorney fees. So they will be enticed to settle.
I figure Sark will net a couple million to sit on his floor (couch is sold) and not do anything. -
Postal91 said:Is this bad lip reading or was that actually it, and in reference to what? This is an amazing gif, and it has been neatly packed into my bookmarks. Thank you, some beers for you.
GrundleStiltzkin said:CheersWestDawg said:
Actually he's Mr. 20,247 poasts.GrundleStiltzkin said:
"We"? Mr. 248 poasts?WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:We were right.
-
Bow Down to Joey's Bellevue?DerekJohnson said:Someone ought to write a book about this shit.
-
The Rise and Fall of House Sarkisian
-
But what else does he have to do to go owen12?TurdBuffer said:A millionaire CFB coach plays the Victim card. Well, one thing is certain: Sark will forever be known as the wannabe pussy who couldn't win big games, keep his marital promises, or, worst of all, hold his liquor. No single trait would doom him, but going 0 for 3 in those categories is unforgivable.
-
Exactly. I'm wondering why our self proclaimed attorney/war hero has no say on this.sarktastic said:
battlefield commission lawyer, now?2001400ex said:Here are the realities:
- in California, the law is written and upheld in court with some basis to the claim.
- Sark's attorneys know he has no money and took this as a 1/3 contingency.
- Sark's attorneys know they won't win in court even with California precedent, they are looking to settle. Settling for $6 million nets them $2 million with little work.
- USC doesn't want a long drawn out legal battle even tho they know they will win. If they do win, Sark won't be able to pay their attorney fees. So they will be enticed to settle.
I figure Sark will net a couple million to sit on his floor (couch is sold) and not do anything.
@d2d -
Sark will win as Haden based everything off of hearsay. He didn't even see Sark that day.Doog_de_Jour said:Man this latest stunt by Sark makes my blood boil.
Just because you have a disability or a disease doesn't give you an excuse to not do your job! My understanding of the ADA is it gives you (as I believe it should) protection to take time off to get treatment and/or ask for reasonable accommodation. You can still be fired if you aren't meeting the standards of the position. Sark is taking advantage of legislation that is meant to help people that are genuinely trying to get their lives back on track.
I hope the USC lawyers rake him through the coals. -
But several others did see him fucked up that morning, and, are, as of today at least, still alive. Will someone 'Collateral' all the witnesses?
-
That is not how the rule against hearsay works.HuskyJW said:
Sark will win as Haden based everything off of hearsay. He didn't even see Sark that day.Doog_de_Jour said:Man this latest stunt by Sark makes my blood boil.
Just because you have a disability or a disease doesn't give you an excuse to not do your job! My understanding of the ADA is it gives you (as I believe it should) protection to take time off to get treatment and/or ask for reasonable accommodation. You can still be fired if you aren't meeting the standards of the position. Sark is taking advantage of legislation that is meant to help people that are genuinely trying to get their lives back on track.
I hope the USC lawyers rake him through the coals. -
How about $C's attorneys wanted to show that Sark WAS coherent, intelligent AND aware of his contractual language but when grossly intoxicated, see exibit 2 ladies and gentlemen of the jury) which showed his acknowledgement and pattern of alcoholism, which led to his poor decisions (please see exhibit 1, the salute to troy, which speaks for itself).Meek said:I'm shocked USC publicly responded in the first place and second, that they actually said "most" of Sark's allegations are untrue implying there is some truth to it. Jury to decide which part I guess.
Sark is fuckered I agree, but Sark has much dirt on Haden, USC, Boosters etc.... I expect a PRINCELY settlement. -
Red wedding?DerekJohnson said:The Rise and Fall of House Sarkisian
-
The Patron ChroniclesDerekJohnson said:The Rise and Fall of House Sarkisian
-
I would love to see PL_SS represent Sark in court. MUST SEE TV. The belly laughs would start at "All rise for the honorable judge"puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How about $C's attorneys wanted to show that Sark WAS coherent, intelligent AND aware of his contractual language but when grossly intoxicated, see exibit 2 ladies and gentlemen of the jury) which showed his acknowledgement and pattern of alcoholism, which led to his poor decisions (please see exhibit 1, the salute to troy, which speaks for itself).Meek said:I'm shocked USC publicly responded in the first place and second, that they actually said "most" of Sark's allegations are untrue implying there is some truth to it. Jury to decide which part I guess.
Sark is fuckered I agree, but Sark has much dirt on Haden, USC, Boosters etc.... I expect a PRINCELY settlement. -
Just Rip It
-
Low tweak.Doogles said:
I would love to see PL_SS represent Sark in court. MUST SEE TV. The belly laughs would start at "All rise for the honorable judge"puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How about $C's attorneys wanted to show that Sark WAS coherent, intelligent AND aware of his contractual language but when grossly intoxicated, see exibit 2 ladies and gentlemen of the jury) which showed his acknowledgement and pattern of alcoholism, which led to his poor decisions (please see exhibit 1, the salute to troy, which speaks for itself).Meek said:I'm shocked USC publicly responded in the first place and second, that they actually said "most" of Sark's allegations are untrue implying there is some truth to it. Jury to decide which part I guess.
Sark is fuckered I agree, but Sark has much dirt on Haden, USC, Boosters etc.... I expect a PRINCELY settlement.
