Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
When Petermen gives the death stare to Whooshing we once again see a grown man's nuts shrivel before our eyes. It's about all I have left in confidence in Petermen. The players are scared of him. But most of them probably don't hate him. It tells me he is real in how he deals with them.
I didn't like Black Power getting run but can't complain about most of the refuse that is gone. Except for String.
But he has to take the next step and that is to take these men he is molding and WIN 15 FUCKING GAMES IN A YEAR TO WRAP UP THE NATTY
If anyone here starts saying how 8 wins next year is good I am going to buy the website, find your personal info and drop by your house and beat you to a pulp in front of your family. Because if you are so fucking soft as to accept another 5-4 league season then an old man can drop by your house and beat you to a pulp
39 ·
Comments
I know people hate the "youth" excuse but there is big difference between Sark being young still in year 4 and Petersen in year 2. Especially with the fucking dreck line/receivers/qb/RB Sark left us with. I think Sark would have maybe won 5 games a year ago tops if he hadn't bolted to USC.
61% in a 13 game schedule = 7.93 wins/year
51% in a 13 game schedule = 6.66 wins/year
so in order to "regress" back to the mean of 7.93 wins/year UW is due for 20 years of averaging over 9 wins per season.
did I stats correctly, because those numbers are about as relevant as yours
And while you're at it, might as well poast the one of Sark and Nansen losing their shit in the same game on that USC player.
Love you, xoxoxo
It's always special when a win over a winless team and a team with a HS quality QB, who routinely shits the bed at the sight of anything Purple, has Doogs once again shooting for the stars in 2016.
You have an upper level D and a mid level at BEST O for 2016. It's an 8 win ceiling. Pin it.
Fucking Doogs anyway.
45-10 fuck off
Sit on a bag of frozen peas and fuck off.
Coogs gonna Coog I guess.