Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My thoughts

topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
in Hardcore Husky Board
We're awfully young.

Next year is going to be pretty fucking special.

Peterman is doing it the right way.

You can't expect a team to be good after having been 0-12 in the last 7 years.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • SteveInSheltonSteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    If we beat the coogs, I will be PUMPED UP for next season. They were a missed field goal and a Portland State win away from being in the playoffs! A win like this would really mean that next year is going to be special.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    Well besides myself, billy and 55, you're the only one to post something valid since September.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    topdawgnc said:

    We're awfully young.

    Next year is going to be pretty fucking special.

    Peterman is doing it the right way.

    You can't expect a team to be good after having been 0-12 in the last 7 years.

    Well youre partly right. 0-12 has zero the frig to do with it. As ive beat into your heads for 7 years, Sark's 0-12 takeover had more talent than Petersen's takeover of sarks 9-4 squad.

    Sark had a veteren oline, the #8 pick in the draft at QB, 3 solid WR's and ch r is polk at TB.

    Peternuts had cyler miles, lavon coleman and 0 olinemen or upperclass depth on the oline to work with. Say what you want about the fab 4 nfl draft picks, that defense sucked hind teat compared to this years.

    Bury 0-12, Bury Sark, bury 2014, 2015...this team is going to reach Levels Sark never could. Pete is who he is for a reason. Its no fluke. He'll have UW pushing for the playoff within 2 years. Its up to you tards to be patient and realize that. T h I s team will lose 2-4 games next year a nd 0-2 and a rose bowl the following. Bank on it. Is t hat good enough for you fannypackers?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    topdawgnc said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    topdawgnc said:

    We're awfully young.

    Next year is going to be pretty fucking special.

    Peterman is doing it the right way.

    You can't expect a team to be good after having been 0-12 in the last 7 years.

    Well youre partly right. 0-12 has zero the frig to do with it. As ive beat into your heads for 7 years, Sark's 0-12 takeover had more talent than Petersen's takeover of sarks 9-4 squad.

    Sark had a veteren oline, the #8 pick in the draft at QB, 3 solid WR's and ch r is polk at TB.

    Peternuts had cyler miles, lavon coleman and 0 olinemen or upperclass depth on the oline to work with. Say what you want about the fab 4 nfl draft picks, that defense sucked hind teat compared to this years.

    Bury 0-12, Bury Sark, bury 2014, 2015...this team is going to reach Levels Sark never could. Pete is who he is for a reason. Its no fluke. He'll have UW pushing for the playoff within 2 years. Its up to you tards to be patient and realize that. T h I s team will lose 2-4 games next year a nd 0-2 and a rose bowl the following. Bank on it. Is t hat good enough for you fannypackers?
    Summed up:

    In two years we are in for a magical season.

    Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,035
    topdawgnc said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    topdawgnc said:

    We're awfully young.

    Next year is going to be pretty fucking special.

    Peterman is doing it the right way.

    You can't expect a team to be good after having been 0-12 in the last 7 years.

    Well youre partly right. 0-12 has zero the frig to do with it. As ive beat into your heads for 7 years, Sark's 0-12 takeover had more talent than Petersen's takeover of sarks 9-4 squad.

    Sark had a veteren oline, the #8 pick in the draft at QB, 3 solid WR's and ch r is polk at TB.

    Peternuts had cyler miles, lavon coleman and 0 olinemen or upperclass depth on the oline to work with. Say what you want about the fab 4 nfl draft picks, that defense sucked hind teat compared to this years.

    Bury 0-12, Bury Sark, bury 2014, 2015...this team is going to reach Levels Sark never could. Pete is who he is for a reason. Its no fluke. He'll have UW pushing for the playoff within 2 years. Its up to you tards to be patient and realize that. T h I s team will lose 2-4 games next year a nd 0-2 and a rose bowl the following. Bank on it. Is t hat good enough for you fannypackers?
    Summed up:

    In two years we are in for a magical season.
    ... in softball
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • skookumskookum Member Posts: 447
    BearsWiin said:

    topdawgnc said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    topdawgnc said:

    We're awfully young.

    Next year is going to be pretty fucking special.

    Peterman is doing it the right way.

    You can't expect a team to be good after having been 0-12 in the last 7 years.

    Well youre partly right. 0-12 has zero the frig to do with it. As ive beat into your heads for 7 years, Sark's 0-12 takeover had more talent than Petersen's takeover of sarks 9-4 squad.

    Sark had a veteren oline, the #8 pick in the draft at QB, 3 solid WR's and ch r is polk at TB.

    Peternuts had cyler miles, lavon coleman and 0 olinemen or upperclass depth on the oline to work with. Say what you want about the fab 4 nfl draft picks, that defense sucked hind teat compared to this years.

    Bury 0-12, Bury Sark, bury 2014, 2015...this team is going to reach Levels Sark never could. Pete is who he is for a reason. Its no fluke. He'll have UW pushing for the playoff within 2 years. Its up to you tards to be patient and realize that. T h I s team will lose 2-4 games next year a nd 0-2 and a rose bowl the following. Bank on it. Is t hat good enough for you fannypackers?
    Summed up:

    In two years we are in for a magical season.
    ... in softball
    Nope, Dux are kicking ass in softball too. Crew is a better bet
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Sounds like UW is primed for another offseason natty
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,959 Founders Club
    topdawgnc said:

    We're awfully young.

    Next year is going to be pretty fucking special.

    Peterman is doing it the right way.

    You can't expect a team to be good after having been 0-12 in the last 7 years.

    did we get the bullets yet? we need more bullets
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    I hear being aggressive works
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Echo to base... We are young... reminds me of a bad P.O.D. song from new metal trash from the otz (00 for you stupid fuckz)

    "we are we are...youth of the nation"

    Of course we are, but now it's almost a full season and we still suck. Fuck next year we should be good, or 2017. I want it now! Tired of dry humping after Red Robins and a shitty movie on your mommies couch to hope I tear off your stretchy pants and hit that muff.

    NOW~

    "I'm crazy and I'm hurt, head on my shoulders, going berserk"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.