Go Back in time to 8/31/2015

godawgst

Had I told you what the D has done, and listed the opponents scores in order 16/0/17/30/12/26/31/3/34/24/7 how many wins would you think we have?

minimum 6 and imo 7.

So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?

whatshouldicareabout

Go back in time?

I don't deal with hypotheticals

2001400ex

Vegas had UW at 4.5 wins.

HTH

HeretoBeatmyChest

godawgst said:

Had I told you what the D has done, and listed the opponents scores in order 16/0/17/30/12/26/31/3/34/24/7 how many wins would you think we have?

minimum 6 and imo 7.

So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?

Agreed. Minimum 6 and you'd hope for 7.

We knew the offense was going to be bad and especially in the first half of the season.

fivehundredmileDAWG

I would have thought 5 or 6 ... I predicted 6 for the season

I'm reserving my comments on the season until it is completely over.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

Vegas had UW at 4.5 wins.

HTH

What do losers write?

godawgst

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

godawgst said:

Had I told you what the D has done, and listed the opponents scores in order 16/0/17/30/12/26/31/3/34/24/7 how many wins would you think we have?

minimum 6 and imo 7.

So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?

Agreed. Minimum 6 and you'd hope for 7.

We knew the offense was going to be bad and especially in the first half of the season.

My point was we thought this was a .500 team with the O struggling and the D regressing from 2014. The O has been what we thought, while the D has been very good and worth a win or two more this year, yet we still have to beat the Cougs to get to .500.

ThomasFremont

With this schedule?

Total fucking failure.

sarktastic

Fuck me.

Now, we're slicing and dicing between 6 and 7 wins to define success?

fivehundredmileDAWG

sarktastic said:

Fuck me.

Now, we're slicing and dicing between 6 and 7 wins to define success?

I think its more like the definition of how fucked it has been

PurpleJ

The D has actually cost us a game or two. The ASU and Utah games come to mind. Not what I consider good. A team strength sure, but on a 5-6 team. Better than Sark's defenses sure, but not a very high bar.

doogsinparadise

PurpleJ said:

The D has actually cost us a game or two. The ASU and Utah games come to mind. Not what I consider good. A team strength sure, but on a 5-6 team. Better than Sark's defenses sure, but not a very high bar.

Asu is absolutely on the offense. Utah is 50-50.

priapism

Vegas doesn't respect the legendary BS coaches, for some reason - something to do about repeat, doom, and history...

UW can get 1-2 more wins with the help of some crucial injuries from the opposing teams.

PurpleJ

doogsinparadise said:

PurpleJ said:

The D has actually cost us a game or two. The ASU and Utah games come to mind. Not what I consider good. A team strength sure, but on a 5-6 team. Better than Sark's defenses sure, but not a very high bar.

Asu is absolutely on the offense. Utah is 50-50.

Why can't we have both?

PostGameOrangeSlices

it's actually a fucking miracle no team has scored in the 50's on us...or even in the 40's.

When was the last time that happened? 15 years ago?

CHRIST

Swaye

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

it's actually a fucking miracle no team has scored in the 50's on us...or even in the 40's.

When was the last time that happened? 15 years ago?

CHRIST

Karma says the loser Cuog backup will now roll out and drop 50 on us.