Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

While you were all focused on the offensive struggles

PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
And water being wet. The defense gave up another crucial touchdown drive late in the game to seal a loss. This defense isn't good. See Bama for what a good defense looks like.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    Husky football is done
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    Huskie football: Beating a dead horse since 2001!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    edited 2015 16
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Is it really THAT interesting to you to perseverate so motherfucking intensely on a point that is essentially semantic?

    Okay, you don't like to use the word 'good' when it comes to Husky defense. You want to call it something else. You want to call Bama's D good. O-fucking-kay.

    You do realize that these are just words, right? It's literally the dumbest fucking thing in the world for you to drone on about what 'good' or 'great' means to you. You have a million fucking poasts just saying that there is a word out there without an exact definition that is generally positively valenced and the way you define that word at any one moment doesn't apply to what you think of our defense. O-fucking-kay.

    To be clear, I'm not discouraging you or anyone else from calling everything (including our D) shitty because most things actually suck. But Christ! almighty man.

    If you're going to be an autistically fixated sandy vag one-note, at least be fucking funny a little bit.

    You write a lot. Besides, haven't you been here long enough to know that I like telling everyone how right I always am?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    PurpleJ said:

    And water being wet. The defense gave up another crucial touchdown drive late in the game to seal a loss. This defense isn't good. See Bama for what a good defense looks like.

    Shit post

    Shit poster
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    Gladstone said:

    PurpleJ said:

    And water being wet. The defense gave up another crucial touchdown drive late in the game to seal a loss. This defense isn't good. See Bama for what a good defense looks like.

    Shit post

    Shit poster
    Doog post.

    Doog poster.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,084 Founders Club
    Could we get @HeretoBeatmyMetrics to post how long the defense has been on the field in each game? As always, I'm too lazy to go back and look at all the games and the TOP of the opponents. I'll leave it to professionals.

    The defense is good, not great. They are not world stoppers, but they do a good job. You can't have your defense stay on the field 75% of the time and expect them to stay fresh.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    edited 2015 16
    We actually won time of possession against ASU (and Utah), but that would be an excuse anyways. They weren't gassed. They just can win games for us when it matters. Same thing against Utah. They folded in the 4th during that game, too. Not a good defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dongmandongman Member Posts: 2,384
    Does it really matter how good a part of the team is when the team is losing?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,084 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    We actually won time of possession against ASU, but that would be an excuse anyways. They weren't gassed. They just can win games for us when it matters. Same thing against Utah. They folded in the 4th during that game, too. Not a good defense.

    The offense is still ass. They still have to score more than 17 points.

    In any case, we? are fucked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Del_GriffithDel_Griffith Member Posts: 128
    Avg Points Allowed Per Game (rounded):
    2015: 20
    2014: 25

    2013: 23
    2012: 24
    2011: 36
    2010: 30
    2009: 27

    http://www.cfbstats.com/2015/team/756/scoring/defense/split.html

    Curious to see how these correlate to avg points scored for each year, but I'm lazy and stoopid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    Can we get those numbers for conference games?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Del_GriffithDel_Griffith Member Posts: 128
    edited 2015 16
    Oh Christ almighty...

    Avg Points Allowed Per Game vs Conference (Rounded)
    2015: 23
    2014: 24

    2013: 28
    2012: 24
    2011: 32
    2010: 30
    2009: 25

    **2011 is a weird year (outlier) because of the shit fest Alamo Bowl.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,965
    The defense is having some issues but again this defense is young and still one of the better defenses in the conference
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    The defense is having some issues but again this defense is young and still one of the better defenses in the conference

    We play in the Pac-12. HTH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,543 Founders Club
    Del_Griffith said:

    Oh Christ almighty...

    Avg Points Allowed Per Game vs Conference (Rounded)
    2015: 23
    2014: 24

    2013: 28
    2012: 24
    2011: 32
    2010: 30
    2009: 25

    **2011 is a weird year (outlier) because of the shit fest Alamo Bowl.

    So what you're saying here is that they really aren't any different than Sark's defenses?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Del_GriffithDel_Griffith Member Posts: 128
    edited 2015 16
    Defensive Avg Points Allowed/Game vs Conference:
    Pete: 23.5
    Sark: 27.8

    4.3 point delta between the two coaches is actually very different; ~20% improvement. I'm a buyer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.