After their special season, Coog fans will be as delusional as the posters here and think they will win the North next year.
The Coogs probably will
You just can't quit them can you? It's more likely the Cuogs miss a bowl than win the North.
The Coogs bring almost everyone back and nearly won the North this year.
Stanford and Cal will take a big step back next year, and Oregon has a shitty defense and will be starting a new QB who may or may not be decent. COOG gets Cal, Oregon, UW (who will be good next year) at home.
Not a stretch that they win the norf by any means
Will probably come down to them and UW, quite honestly
This won't happen, but if it did, it will be a tallest midget scenario where the winner of the North has 3 losses.
2001 called and wants it's reality of what is the Pac12 and how it works back.
Those three teams lost one conference game and were all ranked in the top 10. That will not happen with WSU and UW next year. Take all the screenshots you need.
After their special season, Coog fans will be as delusional as the posters here and think they will win the North next year.
The Coogs probably will
You just can't quit them can you? It's more likely the Cuogs miss a bowl than win the North.
The Coogs bring almost everyone back and nearly won the North this year.
Stanford and Cal will take a big step back next year, and Oregon has a shitty defense and will be starting a new QB who may or may not be decent. COOG gets Cal, Oregon, UW (who will be good next year) at home.
Not a stretch that they win the norf by any means
Will probably come down to them and UW, quite honestly
This won't happen, but if it did, it will be a tallest midget scenario where the winner of the North has 3 losses.
Do you have any rebuttal other than the "Coogs will coog" shtick?
They aren't good you damn bafoon. Why do you think they are? And they don't return everyone next year. Looking at their depth chart, they lose their best WR, their LT and LG, their best two DL, and their best LB.
Oregon and Stanford have been the only two teams in this conference worth a shit the past 6-8 years.
After their special season, Coog fans will be as delusional as the posters here and think they will win the North next year.
The Coogs probably will
You just can't quit them can you? It's more likely the Cuogs miss a bowl than win the North.
The Coogs bring almost everyone back and nearly won the North this year.
Stanford and Cal will take a big step back next year, and Oregon has a shitty defense and will be starting a new QB who may or may not be decent. COOG gets Cal, Oregon, UW (who will be good next year) at home.
Not a stretch that they win the norf by any means
Will probably come down to them and UW, quite honestly
This won't happen, but if it did, it will be a tallest midget scenario where the winner of the North has 3 losses.
Do you have any rebuttal other than the "Coogs will coog" shtick?
No, it his default on many things. But still, he's right. WSU won't win the north.
Stanford will have a new QB, but they'll still have the great white hope at RB and their defense will be much improved with experience.
I actually think UW has a better shot to win the North than WSU will.
The QB Stanford has on deck to take over for Hogan is probably better than Hogan right now.
After their special season, Coog fans will be as delusional as the posters here and think they will win the North next year.
The Coogs probably will
You just can't quit them can you? It's more likely the Cuogs miss a bowl than win the North.
The Coogs bring almost everyone back and nearly won the North this year.
Stanford and Cal will take a big step back next year, and Oregon has a shitty defense and will be starting a new QB who may or may not be decent. COOG gets Cal, Oregon, UW (who will be good next year) at home.
Not a stretch that they win the norf by any means
Will probably come down to them and UW, quite honestly
This won't happen, but if it did, it will be a tallest midget scenario where the winner of the North has 3 losses.
Do you have any rebuttal other than the "Coogs will coog" shtick?
They aren't good you damn bafoon. Why do you think they are? And they don't return everyone next year. Looking at their depth chart, they lose their best WR, their LT and LG, their best two DL, and their best LB.
Oregon and Stanford have been the only two teams in this conference worth a shit the past 6-8 years.
Yep. Cuogs have cooged it a couple times this year but they also got extremely lucky against Zona, Rutgers, Asu, and Oregon. They could easily have 1 win on the season. The whole Pac sucks outside of Stanford, who only suck sometimes.
The Coogs are playing good ball now but they've benefitted from a very easy schedule. No Utah or USC. They get UCLA late in the season after the massive injuries on defense and they also got Oregon a week before Adams and Carrington returned. Their SOS is currently #77. A huge difference from UW's at #7.
Stanford has quite a few key senior losses. They lose their two best OL and six starters on defense who are six of their seven tacklers. Their defense hasn't been great this year and they will be vulnerable in the back end next year. If the QB is good their offense will probably continue to be good. Oregon needs good QB play to contend. It literally was the difference between them going 4-8 or 9-4 this year. Their defense loses a bunch of seniors in the front 7. It could be better but I doubt its going to be good.
The Stanford @ UW game will be huge for UW and especially if its early in the season.
Right now I don't see any of these teams running away with it. It could come down to tiebreakers.
The Coogs are playing good ball now but they've benefitted from a very easy schedule. No Utah or USC. They get UCLA late in the season after the massive injuries on defense and they also got Oregon a week before Adams and Carrington returned. Their SOS is currently #77. A huge difference from UW's at #7.
Stanford has quite a few key senior losses. They lose their two best OL and six starters on defense who are six of their seven tacklers. Their defense hasn't been great this year and they will be vulnerable in the back end next year. If the QB is good their offense will probably continue to be good. Oregon needs good QB play to contend. It literally was the difference between them going 4-8 or 9-4 this year. Their defense loses a bunch of seniors in the front 7. It could be better but I doubt its going to be good.
The Stanford @ UW game will be huge for UW and especially if its early in the season.
Right now I don't see any of these teams running away with it. It could come down to tiebreakers.
That's pretty much how I see it too, but you have to give the edge to Stanford and Oregon because they probably have more talent and those programs are used to winning. It matters.
UW in 2017 could and should be a team to get excited about, but we have to see how it plays out next year.
The Coogs are playing good ball now but they've benefitted from a very easy schedule. No Utah or USC. They get UCLA late in the season after the massive injuries on defense and they also got Oregon a week before Adams and Carrington returned. Their SOS is currently #77. A huge difference from UW's at #7.
Stanford has quite a few key senior losses. They lose their two best OL and six starters on defense who are six of their seven tacklers. Their defense hasn't been great this year and they will be vulnerable in the back end next year. If the QB is good their offense will probably continue to be good. Oregon needs good QB play to contend. It literally was the difference between them going 4-8 or 9-4 this year. Their defense loses a bunch of seniors in the front 7. It could be better but I doubt its going to be good.
The Stanford @ UW game will be huge for UW and especially if its early in the season.
Right now I don't see any of these teams running away with it. It could come down to tiebreakers.
UW in 2017 could and should be a team to get excited about, but we have to see how it plays out next year.
Comments
Oregon and Stanford have been the only two teams in this conference worth a shit the past 6-8 years.
Stanford has quite a few key senior losses. They lose their two best OL and six starters on defense who are six of their seven tacklers. Their defense hasn't been great this year and they will be vulnerable in the back end next year. If the QB is good their offense will probably continue to be good. Oregon needs good QB play to contend. It literally was the difference between them going 4-8 or 9-4 this year. Their defense loses a bunch of seniors in the front 7. It could be better but I doubt its going to be good.
The Stanford @ UW game will be huge for UW and especially if its early in the season.
Right now I don't see any of these teams running away with it. It could come down to tiebreakers.
UW in 2017 could and should be a team to get excited about, but we have to see how it plays out next year.