Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm out

16781012

Comments

  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919

    Anytime you can give up 62 to Utah at home and lose to WSU in the same season you are clearly moving in the right direction.

    Because you ran over Cal.

    Quooks gotta quook




    Any examples that don't involve Pop Warner quarterbacks?

    Doog on.
    Which Pop Warner QB are you trotting out there next year.

    Mahalek or is Taylor staying on campus all Summer eating pig iron and shitting wind sprints into Spring ball? Or is it the great Quook hope of a QB not on campus just yet?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,558 Swaye's Wigwam
    Anyone talking about Oregon's QB is outing themselves when UW has lost 12 straight and Royce Freeman is still on the team.
  • Nevadaduck
    Nevadaduck Member Posts: 193
    edited November 2015
    HuskyInAZ said:

    MisterEm said:

    Anytime you can give up 62 to Utah at home and lose to WSU in the same season you are clearly moving in the right direction.

    Because you ran over Cal.

    Quooks gotta quook




    Any examples that don't involve Pop Warner quarterbacks?

    Doog on.
    So VAJ plays linebacker?


    You could've play linebacker against the coogs and Oregon beats wsu with VAJ. Pop Warner qb's got it to double OT.

    Mariota wouldn't have beat Utah that night.
    That is a GOOD Utah team?


    Interesting, your prophecy of demise is now relegated to a single blowout loss with some retards trying to play QB.

    Cue Arizona 2013-14
    Pretty sure one of those "retard" QBs will be leading your team next year.


    No retard.

    Next year's Qb had minor surgery and will be good to go next season as a redshirt Frosh.

    You appear to be as fucktarded as they say you are around here.


  • Nevadaduck
    Nevadaduck Member Posts: 193
    salemcoog said:

    Anytime you can give up 62 to Utah at home and lose to WSU in the same season you are clearly moving in the right direction.

    Because you ran over Cal.

    Quooks gotta quook




    Any examples that don't involve Pop Warner quarterbacks?

    Doog on.
    Which Pop Warner QB are you trotting out there next year.

    Mahalek or is Taylor staying on campus all Summer eating pig iron and shitting wind sprints into Spring ball? Or is it the great Quook hope of a QB not on campus just yet?


    Dear Twat. Neither.

    Study more. Coogies get pretty chest thumpy when they scratch one out for the first time in 7 years against the practice squad Qb's.

    Coogs sometimes....
  • blackmamba
    blackmamba Member Posts: 184
    edited November 2015


    Some homework for you:

    image
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,079 Founders Club
    Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.

    Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?

    Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.

    But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.

    Or not.
  • Nevadaduck
    Nevadaduck Member Posts: 193

    Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.

    Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?

    Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.

    But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.

    Or not.



    Saviors? Nah.

    Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.

    Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.

    I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.



  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,079 Founders Club

    Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.

    Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?

    Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.

    But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.

    Or not.



    Saviors? Nah.

    Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.

    Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.

    I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.



    I clearly said irregardless of the doogs. Your deflection is noted
  • Nevadaduck
    Nevadaduck Member Posts: 193
    edited November 2015

    Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.

    Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?

    Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.

    But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.

    Or not.



    Saviors? Nah.

    Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.

    Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.

    I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.



    I clearly said irregardless of the doogs. Your deflection is noted



    My English teacher told me that irregardless was not a word and was a redundant form of the word regardless. Personally, I believe you are correct and it is a word, it just confuses me and subconsciously I prepare for a ruler to the back of the knuckles.




    The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the speculation among references is that it may be a blend, or portmanteau word, of irrespective and regardless, both of which are standard English words. By blending these words, a word is created whose meaning is not predictable from the meanings of its constituent morphemes. Since the prefix ir- means "not" (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means "without", the word contains a double negative.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,079 Founders Club

    Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.

    Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?

    Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.

    But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.

    Or not.



    Saviors? Nah.

    Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.

    Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.

    I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.



    I clearly said irregardless of the doogs. Your deflection is noted



    My English teacher told me that irregardless was not a word and was a redundant form of the word regardless. Personally, I believe you are correct and it is a word, it just confuses me and subconsciously I prepare for a ruler to the back of the knuckles.




    The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the speculation among references is that it may be a blend, or portmanteau word, of irrespective and regardless, both of which are standard English words. By blending these words, a word is created whose meaning is not predictable from the meanings of its constituent morphemes. Since the prefix ir- means "not" (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means "without", the word contains a double negative.
    When we started using irregardless as a joke it wasn't a word. It has actually been added to the dictionary because so many fucktards use it on the internets, which is why we first started using it as a joke.

    Kind of a mute point now