I'm out
Comments
-
Which Pop Warner QB are you trotting out there next year.Nevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:Anytime you can give up 62 to Utah at home and lose to WSU in the same season you are clearly moving in the right direction.
Because you ran over Cal.
Quooks gotta quook
Any examples that don't involve Pop Warner quarterbacks?
Doog on.
Mahalek or is Taylor staying on campus all Summer eating pig iron and shitting wind sprints into Spring ball? Or is it the great Quook hope of a QB not on campus just yet? -
Anyone talking about Oregon's QB is outing themselves when UW has lost 12 straight and Royce Freeman is still on the team.
-
HuskyInAZ said:
Pretty sure one of those "retard" QBs will be leading your team next year.Nevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:
That is a GOOD Utah team?Nevadaduck said:MisterEm said:
So VAJ plays linebacker?Nevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:Anytime you can give up 62 to Utah at home and lose to WSU in the same season you are clearly moving in the right direction.
Because you ran over Cal.
Quooks gotta quook
Any examples that don't involve Pop Warner quarterbacks?
Doog on.
You could've play linebacker against the coogs and Oregon beats wsu with VAJ. Pop Warner qb's got it to double OT.
Mariota wouldn't have beat Utah that night.
Interesting, your prophecy of demise is now relegated to a single blowout loss with some retards trying to play QB.
Cue Arizona 2013-14
No retard.
Next year's Qb had minor surgery and will be good to go next season as a redshirt Frosh.
You appear to be as fucktarded as they say you are around here.
-
salemcoog said:
Which Pop Warner QB are you trotting out there next year.Nevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:Anytime you can give up 62 to Utah at home and lose to WSU in the same season you are clearly moving in the right direction.
Because you ran over Cal.
Quooks gotta quook
Any examples that don't involve Pop Warner quarterbacks?
Doog on.
Mahalek or is Taylor staying on campus all Summer eating pig iron and shitting wind sprints into Spring ball? Or is it the great Quook hope of a QB not on campus just yet?
Dear Twat. Neither.
Study more. Coogies get pretty chest thumpy when they scratch one out for the first time in 7 years against the practice squad Qb's.
Coogs sometimes.... -
Some homework for you:
-
Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.
Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?
Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.
But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.
Or not. -
RaceBannon said:
Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.
Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?
Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.
But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.
Or not.
Saviors? Nah.
Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.
Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.
I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.
-
I clearly said irregardless of the doogs. Your deflection is notedNevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.
Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?
Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.
But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.
Or not.
Saviors? Nah.
Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.
Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.
I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005. -
RaceBannon said:
I clearly said irregardless of the doogs. Your deflection is notedNevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.
Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?
Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.
But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.
Or not.
Saviors? Nah.
Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.
Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.
I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.
My English teacher told me that irregardless was not a word and was a redundant form of the word regardless. Personally, I believe you are correct and it is a word, it just confuses me and subconsciously I prepare for a ruler to the back of the knuckles.
The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the speculation among references is that it may be a blend, or portmanteau word, of irrespective and regardless, both of which are standard English words. By blending these words, a word is created whose meaning is not predictable from the meanings of its constituent morphemes. Since the prefix ir- means "not" (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means "without", the word contains a double negative. -
When we started using irregardless as a joke it wasn't a word. It has actually been added to the dictionary because so many fucktards use it on the internets, which is why we first started using it as a joke.Nevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:
I clearly said irregardless of the doogs. Your deflection is notedNevadaduck said:RaceBannon said:Look irregardless of 12 in a row and accusations of dooging the quooking in this thread is far worse. Teen Army Boy Awards and QBs who haven't seen the field as saviors is fucking stupid.
Oregon regressed this year. "Yeah it was always going to be this year" is the type of stupid shit doogs are saying about OUR throw away year. Always have to copy us don't you?
Two losses and counting. Loss to WSU. Not beating UW by 3 touchdowns. Lose to Stanford and you're looking at 3-4 losses.
But then Helfirch and Pellum will right the ship.
Or not.
Saviors? Nah.
Track record of success under Helfrich and Frost is where my optimism comes from at the QB position and have no doubt in my mind that Jonsen will be another handfull at QB. Had VAJ spent the summer in Eugene and all of fall camp, instead of trying to figure out 2+2 , this conversation wouldn't be occurring. Even the doogiest of doogs can see the difference he makes as he gets more time in the offense. They did an admirable job with a 3 star Qb the last couple years.
Doogs on the other hand are used to fucking failures at the Qb position regardless of the star ratings. They have proved for 15 years that trotting piles of shit out week after week behind center is what they do.
I see how you can get confused. It's the same doog hope and pray thought process that's been going strong since 2005.
My English teacher told me that irregardless was not a word and was a redundant form of the word regardless. Personally, I believe you are correct and it is a word, it just confuses me and subconsciously I prepare for a ruler to the back of the knuckles.
The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the speculation among references is that it may be a blend, or portmanteau word, of irrespective and regardless, both of which are standard English words. By blending these words, a word is created whose meaning is not predictable from the meanings of its constituent morphemes. Since the prefix ir- means "not" (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means "without", the word contains a double negative.
Kind of a mute point now




