Semper Fi Dawgs

IrishDawg22

Qualls, Hall, Daniels, Crane and Ross all look like they will compete for PT next year. Hopefully we can add Mathis into the mix tomorrow.

MelloDawg

Qualls seemed to excel on defense, but since he flashed some ability as a FB, Sark will put him strictly on offense

purplehaze

we have a glaring need for a receiver to complement Williams. have you seen Qualls split out?

IrishDawg22

And we were so close to having a REAL football thread going. Maybe next time.

purplehaze

Does this site do real?

IrishDawg22

purplehaze said:

Does this site do real?

My bad.

Global

OK, let's try.
Yes! We got Mathis (again). He looks like a real DE, and should give us a big boost next year and going forward. Tosh needs to expand his repertoire beyond his bull rush move, but Mathis looks like he has all the tools to upgrade our DE corps.

TierbsHsotBoobs

I'm looking forward to the idiot fans hating all these guys in 2015 like they hate Price now.

RaceBannon

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

I'm looking forward to the idiot fans hating all these guys in 2015 like they hate Price now.

This
Lather rinse repeat. Sarks special fifth year depends on this class of true freshmen to replace his 4 classes of players doogs now hate
#KeithPrice

section8

All while complaining about why so many freshmen are starting. I hate this fanbase

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Seriously, why is that we're suffering through Sark's 4th year and we're talking about incoming freshmen competing for playing time?

If I'm not mistaken, hasn't the Good Guy - hi Kim! - constantly said you need 4th and 5th players on the lines?

Speaking of the lines, UW had 4 OL committed now it's down to 2 yet UW has 4 WRs committed. Is there any doubt as to why we refer to Sark as Rick with the Rose Bowl?

Every one of the Sark defenders is cheering every woof he tweets and the great ranking for this class but we as fans are getting set up for another major disappointment when the team doesn't have any OL depth.

Global

Most knowledgeable people are not talking about these incoming freshmen competing for playing time in 2013 on the OL. Perhaps some are, but most people know that the issue is to continuously build depth and experience on the OL, and to do so you need 4-5 OL recruits every year, and then redshirt them and give them chance to develop. For everything where Kim may be wrong, he is right that normally you expect an OL to have 4th and 5th year guys.

In our 2009 class that Sark inherited, the same class with Price and Trufant, the only OL recruit was Daniel Mafoe, a JC player who never got admitted. So that class was a complete miss for us now, and normally we should have a couple of RS seniors helping, but we have none now. The 2010 class had seven linemen, lead by Kohler and the now retired Porter. 2011 had just two. So our OL is now relying far too much on the 2010 class.

So the erratic recruiting is really a problem. In 2011 we had four OL, but lost two late to Colorado and lost the key in state recruits too.

That 2010 class will also graduate soon, Kohler after next year and the rest in 2014. We need depth behind them. If we miss on the 2012 and 2013 classes to build that back-up depth, we are screwed again. That is inexcusable. If good players refuse to play for Cozzetto, fire him. If good recruits are not getting developed by Cozzetto, fire him. If Sark cannot deal with that, fire him. I am fed up with this OL situation.

RaceBannon

Sark fire him.

HTH a bit more crisp

nihilistdawg

Just picked up Jermaine Kelly today. CB/S that has played some WR. Someone needs to delete that portion of his bio before Sark sees it.