When was the last time we beat 2 ranked teams in 1 season?

section_332

And doing it at home and on the road.....

dongman

Uoots and Trooj, Both not that good.

RaceBannon

USC is no longer rated

Mad_Son

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

dongman

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

2003 was cuog, cuog never counts?

RaceBannon

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

So Sark did it twice?


Hmm

Mad_Son

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

So Sark did it twice?


Hmm

He also did two at home in 2009 but I didn't list that since it wasn't the last of its kind.

RaceBannon

Mad_Son said:

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

So Sark did it twice?


Hmm

He also did two at home in 2009 but I didn't list that since it wasn't the last of its kind.

This is kind of been my point this week. Sark was not Ty horrible all the time. In his 7 wins a year there would always be a game or two where we would think - that didn't suck.

So far that is all Petermen has done.

Sark's second year he won out and beat Classy Nebraska, then thanks to a front loaded schedule of patsies started his third year on fire. About the time we start to think it could be possible he gets curb stomped by all the good teams at the end of the schedule. Same as it ever was.

If people are wondering why I don't "see the difference in what Petersen is doing" its because it isn't different yet.

Mad_Son

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

So Sark did it twice?


Hmm

He also did two at home in 2009 but I didn't list that since it wasn't the last of its kind.

This is kind of been my point this week. Sark was not Ty horrible all the time. In his 7 wins a year there would always be a game or two where we would think - that didn't suck.

So far that is all Petermen has done.

Sark's second year he won out and beat Classy Nebraska, then thanks to a front loaded schedule of patsies started his third year on fire. About the time we start to think it could be possible he gets curb stomped by all the good teams at the end of the schedule. Same as it ever was.

If people are wondering why I don't "see the difference in what Petersen is doing" its because it isn't different yet.

The difference at this point is that Petersen is an adult so there is still hope. Petersen has proven nothing though. Hasn't proven he can make it. Hasn't proven he can't.

TommySQC

section_332 said:

And doing it at home and on the road.....</blockqu
I havent beat a ranked opponent since high school. Not sure about you...

dnc

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

So Sark did it twice?


Hmm

He also did two at home in 2009 but I didn't list that since it wasn't the last of its kind.

This is kind of been my point this week. Sark was not Ty horrible all the time. In his 7 wins a year there would always be a game or two where we would think - that didn't suck.

So far that is all Petermen has done.

Sark's second year he won out and beat Classy Nebraska, then thanks to a front loaded schedule of patsies started his third year on fire. About the time we start to think it could be possible he gets curb stomped by all the good teams at the end of the schedule. Same as it ever was.

If people are wondering why I don't "see the difference in what Petersen is doing" its because it isn't different yet.

The biggest difference is Pete doesn't get curb stomped. We (?) have been in virtually all of Peterman's losses. This makes them more frustrating in a way because it feels like his record should be better, but the lack of plungerings gives me hope that Pete could actually be one or two tweaks away from actually doing something here. Everytime Sark got his shit pushed in it was a reminder that he was way out of his league.

PurpleJ

I don't know. I just know the last time we won a Rose Bowl was 15 years ago.

Swaye

PurpleJ said:

I don't know. I just know the last time we won a Rose Bowl was 15 years ago.

I was 27 at the time and thinking, finally, we got this shit straightened out and now it's back to kicking ass for the next decade. I am so fucking stupid.

sarktastic

pretty sure Eastern was ranked.

sarktastic

PurpleJ said:

I don't know. I just know the last time we won a Rose Bowl was 15 years ago.

Most of the kids Peterman is recruiting couldn't say 'football' the last time we were in the Rose Bowl

Fire_Marshall_Bill

dnc said:

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

RaceBannon said:

Mad_Son said:

2012 for two ranked teams (both home)
2010 for away and bowl game
2003 for home and away

So Sark did it twice?


Hmm

He also did two at home in 2009 but I didn't list that since it wasn't the last of its kind.

This is kind of been my point this week. Sark was not Ty horrible all the time. In his 7 wins a year there would always be a game or two where we would think - that didn't suck.

So far that is all Petermen has done.

Sark's second year he won out and beat Classy Nebraska, then thanks to a front loaded schedule of patsies started his third year on fire. About the time we start to think it could be possible he gets curb stomped by all the good teams at the end of the schedule. Same as it ever was.

If people are wondering why I don't "see the difference in what Petersen is doing" its because it isn't different yet.

The biggest difference is Pete doesn't get curb stomped. We (?) have been in virtually all of Peterman's losses. This makes them more frustrating in a way because it feels like his record should be better, but the lack of plungerings gives me hope that Pete could actually be one or two tweaks away from actually doing something here. Everytime Sark got his shit pushed in it was a reminder that he was way out of his league.

It's a good sign of mental toughness and preparation. Although that Stanford game was a borderline blowout, but I guess we can pull out the backup q.b. card.

HuskyHalfBrain

USC and Nebraska at San Diego?

Who gives a fuck, we still suck.