Okung queeeerieie

TTJ

Does the zero-sack win against the Cowboys, with Okung on the bench, reduce the odds that SEA re-signs Okung to zero?

dnc

I hope so. I actually like Okung, but he's going to get paid way more than he earns.

SteveInShelton

I think the zero-sack performance was more about the game plan than the O line. Bailey was getting owned by Hardy right from the snap, but Wilson was releasing the ball faster than I've ever seen.

Okung is still on the pre-CBA rookie wage so he's making way more than he should, if they want to keep him it could end up being for the same amount he's making now. Personally I think they should let him go though, he keeps regressing and is always hurt.

dnc

SteveInShelton said:

I think the zero-sack performance was more about the game plan than the O line. Bailey was getting owned by Hardy right from the snap, but Wilson was releasing the ball faster than I've ever seen.

Okung is still on the pre-CBA rookie wage so he's making way more than he should, if they want to keep him it could end up being for the same amount he's making now. Personally I think they should let him go though, he keeps regressing and is always hurt.

Dallas also brought just a four man rush more often than any team they've faced all season. Dallas obviously thought they could get to Wilson without blitzing, and they did get decent pressure, but I doubt anyone else will be following that example. They'll see more blitzes going forward.