More PM for HondaFS

sarktastic

2001400ex said:

There have been numerous polls of the worlds climate scientists and meteorologists and its overwhelming that you are wrong.

But keep believing politicians and journalists, they are clearly more educated.

Yes, I like to resort to polling researchers disparate for grants... when the actual science doesn't back my pre-determined outcome.

sarktastic

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

Effin moron.

So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.

Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.

2001400ex

sarktastic said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

Effin moron.

So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.

Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.

It's clear you don't see the irony.

pawz

2001400ex said:

sarktastic said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

Effin moron.

So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.

Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.

It's clear you don't see the irony.

Speaking of irony, why do you hate NASA?

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Not mentioned: The Arctic ice has been rapidly decreasing since about 1980.

2001400ex

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

sarktastic said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

Effin moron.

So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.

Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.

It's clear you don't see the irony.

Speaking of irony, why do you hate NASA?

Why do you hate reading for comprehension?