Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Disagree with Jerry Brewer on one point.

Passion
Passion Member Posts: 4,622
edited September 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
In his story in today's Times, Brewer said about Sark: "His greatest detractors have called him wishy-washy or too interested in showing off. But he’ll tell you the dueling philosophies were necessary to get the best out of players he inherited and to minimize weaknesses as he tried to build the program..."

Sorry, but that is not my complaint. It's his poor hiring decisions (holt, cox, cozzetto), and his inability to recruit top-flight OLs and interior DLs while he seemingly has no problem recruiting QBs and WRs. If I owned a flag football team he'd be my coach.

I also liked this gem: "In the big picture, Sarkisian has done what you wondered if he could do: Revise the USC way and find his own way at Washington. Sarkisian still has plenty to prove, but his work is intriguing again. The Huskies’ offense is a thrill ride again."

I love how sports writers speak in superlatives after a win, and smash a coach to pieces after a loss. As soon as an opposing defense (you know, one that wasn't depleted after 2012, like boise state) shuts us down, I wonder what Brewer will say then?

Link: seattletimes.com/html/jerrybrewer/2021790626_brewer10xml.html
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Who says "wishy-washy"???
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    edited September 2013
    Is every one of your poasts about blacks?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    edited September 2013
    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Might be time for you to familiarize yourself with Rule 7.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Might be time for you to familiarize yourself with Rule 7.

    First off, welcome to our message boards. You're about to enter lively forums centered around Husky Football. We're looking to create a place where people can relax and say what's on their mind. The majority of posters are very passionate about Husky Football and that will show itself in the types of dialogue featured here. The best advice might be to lurk awhile and get acclimated to the environment before posting. Given a little time, you'll "get it" and really come to enjoy this place. Before you know it, you might become a regular too.

    If you have any questions or concerns at all, feel free to send me or the mods a personal message.

    Thanks,
    Derek
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Might be time for you to familiarize yourself with Rule 7.

    First off, welcome to our message boards. You're about to enter lively forums centered around Husky Football. We're looking to create a place where people can relax and say what's on their mind. The majority of posters are very passionate about Husky Football and that will show itself in the types of dialogue featured here. The best advice might be to lurk awhile and get acclimated to the environment before posting. Given a little time, you'll "get it" and really come to enjoy this place. Before you know it, you might become a regular too.

    If you have any questions or concerns at all, feel free to send me or the mods a personal message.

    Thanks,
    Derek
    mods?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Passion said:

    In his story in today's Times, Brewer said about Sark: "His greatest detractors have called him wishy-washy or too interested in showing off. But he’ll tell you the dueling philosophies were necessary to get the best out of players he inherited and to minimize weaknesses as he tried to build the program..."

    Sorry, but that is not my complaint. It's his poor hiring decisions (holt, cox, cozzetto), and his inability to recruit top-flight OLs and interior DLs while he seemingly has no problem recruiting QBs and WRs. If I owned a flag football team he'd be my coach.

    I also liked this gem: "In the big picture, Sarkisian has done what you wondered if he could do: Revise the USC way and find his own way at Washington. Sarkisian still has plenty to prove, but his work is intriguing again. The Huskies’ offense is a thrill ride again."

    I love how sports writers speak in superlatives after a win, and smash a coach to pieces after a loss. As soon as an opposing defense (you know, one that wasn't depleted after 2012, like boise state) shuts us down, I wonder what Brewer will say then?

    Link: seattletimes.com/html/jerrybrewer/2021790626_brewer10xml.html

    Who the fuck ever reads Jerry Brewer?! Has he ever produced one good article in his life?!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    Wishy, washy? Huh?

    Cream Puff is consistent. He's a straight up pussy all the time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club
    edited September 2013
    MikeDamone said:

    I don't get how this has all been solved by one game. Wasn't anything learned by the two USC wins where the same shit was being said? If there is one characteristic that I think defines a doog, that's the inability to learn from the past.

    LIPO

    TruthSpeaker Swaye said:



    Fawning Seattle Media wandering around with a crown looking for a place to put it. Same as it ever was.

    Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
    I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

    I do that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
    I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

    I do that.
    If passive aggressively voting down posts you disagree with is wrong, I don't want to be right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Tailgater said:

    Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.

    Can't expect to win on the road
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    ThomasFremont said:

    Tailgater said:

    Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.

    Can't expect to win on the road
    You can't expect to win in a hostile environment especially in THIS economy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    The elevation at Soldier Field is gonna be a problem...

    http://www.trails.com/usgs-topo-soldier-field-locale-topographic-map-418694.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited September 2013
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
    I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

    I do that.
    I'd like to be a blowhard tough guy on the web that offers nothing like man boobs, but I have a fully functional brain. And at least I don't suck oregon's balls.

    Regarding Softy and Brewer offering no worthwhile information (if that is your question), I mostly agree with you. Regardless, I read everything related to Husky Football, and then sift through the mountain of bullshit in order to get the occasional nugget of worthwhile information. For example, a couple of weeks ago I linked a Brewer story where he said that 7-6 is no longer acceptable and Sark's seat is getting warm. It's the closest thing I've heard to a "tough" statement, and it got a negative reaction from the pollyanas on doucheman.com (of course).

    I also posted Colin Cowherd's quotes about how UW is lacking on the D-line. First time I've heard that in the mainstream media.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,099 Founders Club
    If you've never sucked Oregon's balls you're really in no position to criticize

    #brents
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
    I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

    I do that.
    I'd like to be a blowhard tough guy on the web that offers nothing like man boobs, but I have a fully functional brain. And at least I don't suck oregon's balls.

    Regarding Softy and Brewer offering no worthwhile information (if that is your question), I mostly agree with you. Regardless, I read everything related to Husky Football, and then sift through the mountain of bullshit in order to get the occasional nugget of worthwhile information. For example, a couple of weeks ago I linked a Brewer story where he said that 7-6 is no longer acceptable and Sark's seat is getting warm. It's the closest thing I've heard to a "tough" statement, and it got a negative reaction from the pollyanas on doucheman.com (of course).

    I also posted Colin Cowherd's quotes about how UW is lacking on the D-line. First time I've heard that in the mainstream media.
    So you agree that Brewer offers nothing worthwhile other than the weakest of threats about Sark's job security, yet you continue to read him.

    El. Oh. El.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.

    Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.

    Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
    I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

    I do that.
    I'd like to be a blowhard tough guy on the web that offers nothing like man boobs, but I have a fully functional brain. And at least I don't suck oregon's balls.

    Regarding Softy and Brewer offering no worthwhile information (if that is your question), I mostly agree with you. Regardless, I read everything related to Husky Football, and then sift through the mountain of bullshit in order to get the occasional nugget of worthwhile information. For example, a couple of weeks ago I linked a Brewer story where he said that 7-6 is no longer acceptable and Sark's seat is getting warm. It's the closest thing I've heard to a "tough" statement, and it got a negative reaction from the pollyanas on doucheman.com (of course).

    I also posted Colin Cowherd's quotes about how UW is lacking on the D-line. First time I've heard that in the mainstream media.
    So you agree that Brewer offers nothing worthwhile other than the weakest of threats about Sark's job security, yet you continue to read him.

    El. Oh. El.
    I love when Doogs argue with you disagreeing with something then at the end of the argument they end up agreeing with you without even realizing it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,524 Founders Club
    Jerry Brewer had seen enough by the Boise State game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LevelPar
    LevelPar Member Posts: 447
    You guys need at quick intervention at Western State Mental Hospital. They have program to stop the ball sucking urge! Even though there is no cure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    LevelPar said:

    You guys need at quick intervention at Western State Mental Hospital. They have program to stop the ball sucking urge! Even though there is no cure.

    Drunk. Posting. Rules.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    what's wrong wit Cozzy?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Tailgater said:

    Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.

    Tailgater said:

    Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.

    Tailgater is here? Dawgman's biggest ball gargler? WTF?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    welcome. did you bring your 25k posts with you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jmc84
    jmc84 Member Posts: 499
    LevelPar said:

    You guys need at quick intervention at Western State Mental Hospital. They have program to stop the ball sucking urge! Even though there is no cure.

    Pressing. Or possible drunk posting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter