I haven't looked at time of possession, but how long did Stanford's O have the ball? Petersen's offense couldn't keep themselves on the field long enough to give the D a break.
Pretty special to hold Stanford to a scant 478 yards and 31 points. Fucking idiot doogs. Hi @dnc @PostGameOrangeSlices @GreenRiverGatorz @CuntWaffle @Gladstone @Baseman @Tequilla @whatshouldicareabout @AtomicDawg @sarktastic @godawgst
Other than the pick by Baker, the secondary made Hogan look like a potential NFL draft pick.
Our D is fucking good. You stay on the field 70 percent of a game because your inept offense and stupid fucking coaches can't execute their way out of a fucking wet bag.
Our D is fucking good. You stay on the field 70 percent of a game because your inept offense and stupid fucking coaches can't execute their way out of a fucking wet bag. You could also argue that they couldn't get off the field.
It's hard to call a defense good when they've only stopped one team in conference, drunk Sark's Trojans. RIP. Cal - 30 points, 28 first downs, 481 yards, 10-20 on 3rd USC - 12 points, 20 first downs, 346 yards, 1-13 on 3rd (crucial!)Oregon - 26 points, 21 first downs, 442 yards, 9-18 on 3rdStanford - 30 points, 25 first downs, 478 yards, 6-14 on 3rdSo they usually give up 30 points, 450 yards and allow about 50% on 3rd down.That isn't good. And people were actually calling them "great" after the Cal game. Boggles my mind. A good defense can win games in spite of an offense. An average defense will do enough to keep the scoreline respectable. This defense is average, with the potential to be good next year. They are not good yet. You want to see a good defense, go watch my Crimson Tide. That is a good defense.
You could also argue that they couldn't get off the field.
