Surge Protection

ThomasFremont

HFNY said:

I can now....was just waiting for his wild flaming to turn into something more concrete like a "raping".

allpurpleallgold said:

HFNY said:

Glad you finally put it down that you expect a raping. Got it, thanks.

ThomasFremont said:

HFNY said:

Because I want an actual answer from you rather than throwing a bunch of whiny comments out that don't mean much.

So come on, what do you think the score will be?

Imagine a very large number, than imagine a very small number. Say, 34-17.

We(???) are getting RAPED by the Tree.

Is that clear enough for you???

Stop.

It was clear from the beginning to everyone but you.

HTH

PurpleJ

HFNY said:

I think it is....Stanford is well balanced on O but the Husky D will be the one thing that will keep Washington in the game, at least for awhile.

PurpleJ said:

Our defense isn't good.

Holding Oregon under 500 yards at home was special.

BennyBeaver

@HFNY has gone full retard.

or maybe he's always been full retard. I haven't been paying attention.

doogsinparadise

I remember when Stanford came to Husky Stadium last year and the Dawgs lost on a brain cramp by the HC, but it seemed like the two programs were trending in opposite directions and that Peterman was going to make things happen. Somehow we're? right back in that same spot, except this time Stanford is the one once again trending up and the UW is treading water (if you're generous). Wonder what happened?

TTJ

17-10.

Huskies.