Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Remember when ...

topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
in Hardcore Husky Board
Race wanted Teford

And

Boobs wanted Hawkins

And we listen to those two.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • DontCallMeShirleyDontCallMeShirley Member Posts: 283
    No
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DontCallMeShirleyDontCallMeShirley Member Posts: 283
    DerekJohnson said:

    Boobs also guaranteed UW would beat Stanford last year

    Link?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,339 Founders Club
    Tedford challenged Carroll before Harbaugh did
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,821
    RaceBannon said:

    Tedford challenged Carroll before Harbaugh did

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,339 Founders Club
    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,542 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James

    Not fair. Neu didn't get five years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThumpThump Member Posts: 793
    PurpleJ said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James

    Not fair. Neu didn't get five years.
    That was his own fault.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,542 Founders Club
    Thump said:

    PurpleJ said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James

    Not fair. Neu didn't get five years.
    That was his own fault.
    No. It was BabsFS fault. People forget that Neu won his case against the school for wrongful termination.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    PurpleJ said:

    Thump said:

    PurpleJ said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James

    Not fair. Neu didn't get five years.
    That was his own fault.
    No. It was BabsFS fault. People forget that Neu won his case against the school for wrongful termination.
    Just like everyone forgets Finland.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    PurpleJ said:

    Thump said:

    PurpleJ said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James

    Not fair. Neu didn't get five years.
    That was his own fault.
    No. It was BabsFS fault. People forget that Neu won his case against the school for wrongful termination.
    However most Dawgs wanted him ran out on rail anyway back then. Something about not recruiting any lineman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Cal was bad back when Tedford took over. Tom Holmoe, the coach before Tedford went 9-30 in Pac 10 play at Cal. Tedford did a very good job for awhile. If anything, he's an example of a good coach that lost it. We could be seeing something similar with Petersen.

    That's an interesting comparison.

    Seems as if Peterman still has it on the D side ...

    Wonder what happens if he loses Kawasaki.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,339 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Thump said:

    PurpleJ said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I bet Tedford first 5 years had a higher winning percentage than any Husky coach since James

    Not fair. Neu didn't get five years.
    That was his own fault.
    No. It was BabsFS fault. People forget that Neu won his case against the school for wrongful termination.
    However most Dawgs wanted him ran out on rail anyway back then. Something about not recruiting any lineman.
    Back then going 8-4 was grounds for firing. Now if we could ever get to 8-4 it is grounds for an extension
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,035
    IIRC, one big issue with Skippy's other job interview was that he met with the 49ers secretly, and only fessed up to it when somebody called him on it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,339 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    IIRC, one big issue with Skippy's other job interview was that he met with the 49ers secretly, and only fessed up to it when somebody called him on it.

    Yeah but only doogs cared. Rick managed to lose both sides of the fan base even though at that time it was not obvious that there were two sides. The old school Lambo doogs hated him from day 1. Winner Dawgs were starting to hate him for losing too much.

    The old school Lambo fucking stupid doogs won the day when they used that interview and a Final 4 pool to fire him in June, thus forever burying Husky Football under the man boobs of their new Coach Gilby. #HiHarv

    Winner Dawgs probably would have gone for a firing after the season if he kept his downward trajectory. The Rose Bowl win should have given him that 5th year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.