Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

If Cyler Miles came back today

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    If the last 15 years have taught us anything, it's that making big changes often result in dysfunction.

    This motherfucking Doog deserves another 0-12 so bad.

    The last 15 years taught us that as soon as you find out you have a shitty head coach, you fire the shitty head coach.

    You can't conclude that Pete is a shitty HC yet ... not enough data points.
    Gilby just needed more time. It was so unfair to fire him after two years.
    So you are comparing a coach that failed at a previous PAC job and then managed to go from 6-6 to 1-10 to a coach that has had a track record of success and is in the process of rebuilding a program from the ground up that he took over from a womanizing drunkard?

    And you are saying some of the shit I say is stupid? Pot. Kettle. Black. #BlackKettlePotsMatter
    The failed from the previous PAC job is a fair point. The rest of that paragraph is bullshit.
  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    Jake beat a bunch of shit tier schools and osu. Cyler did that too
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    If the last 15 years have taught us anything, it's that making big changes often result in dysfunction.

    This motherfucking Doog deserves another 0-12 so bad.

    The last 15 years taught us that as soon as you find out you have a shitty head coach, you fire the shitty head coach.

    You can't conclude that Pete is a shitty HC yet ... not enough data points.
    Gilby just needed more time. It was so unfair to fire him after two years.
    So you are comparing a coach that failed at a previous PAC job and then managed to go from 6-6 to 1-10 to a coach that has had a track record of success and is in the process of rebuilding a program from the ground up that he took over from a womanizing drunkard?

    And you are saying some of the shit I say is stupid? Pot. Kettle. Black. #BlackKettlePotsMatter
    The failed from the previous PAC job is a fair point. The rest of that paragraph is bullshit.
    Well Gilby did go from 6-6 to 1-10 ... that much was true.

    The part about rebuilding a program when you had 4 top 44 draft picks on your roster ... is bullshit.

  • McRibMcRib Member Posts: 227

    Limp cobra >>> blind giraffe pretending to be a trebuchet on crack

    And getting decapitated on the runway to boot...
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,821

    Gilby just needed more time. It was so unfair to fire him after two years.

    Great comparison. In Gilby's year two, UW went 1-10. And lost at USC 38-0. Oh, and Gilby resigned, BTW.

    But other than that, you nailed it.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    TTJ said:

    Gilby just needed more time. It was so unfair to fire him after two years.

    Great comparison. In Gilby's year two, UW went 1-10. And lost at USC 38-0. Oh, and Gilby resigned, BTW.

    But other than that, you nailed it.
    It was Sarkasm.


    Your better than this.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,542 Founders Club
    Cyler isn't even smart enough to run the option. And he has the arm strength of a 5 year old girl. Give me Troy back, though.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    edited October 2015
    HuskyJW said:

    Would you want him as the starter....even if Jake was 100%

    Sweet Gawd in Heaven...I'm going to have to say yes.

    image
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    I'll take Browning solely for the reason he has some potential to eventually be good. That said, Browning isn't any better than Cyler was last year.
  • JaWarrenJaHookerJaWarrenJaHooker Member Posts: 2,093
    Browning is better than Cyler

    Smith somehow got worse. Maybe he has a drinking problem.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited October 2015
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Would you want him as the starter....even if Jake was 100%

    Sweet Gawd in Heaven...I'm going to have to say yes.

    If you upvoted this you should handed a gas can, a match, and a reservation on the Aurora Bridge ...

    This is by far the most fucktarded thing I've read all day.
    Your shit attempting to justify punting on fourth and 1 was a thousand times more fucktarded than this.
    Even more fucktarded than yours (and others) not realizing that there's as much of a valid argument to going for it versus not going for it?

    I can see both sides of the argument? Can you?

    Is this even a criticism to people if UW won the game? Probably not.
    People who are dead fucking wrong but somewhat intelligent always try to resort to this "I see both sides of the argument" tactic in order to claim the moral high ground.

    Bullshit.

    Answer me these three questions:

    -What is the percentage chance UW gets a first down if they go on 4th and 1 in that situation?

    -If they make it what are the percentages for getting a score or FG out of the drive?


    -If they punt how many yards of field position do you expect them to gain?
Sign In or Register to comment.