Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

petersen quote



This is obvious, but i dont think it can be understated. You keep preaching a message that loses games, you're going to lose the team. Wins like this keeps the players bought into the message/system.
«1

Comments

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited October 2015

    That is the best news for Browning. He can get in the film room and see where he had touchdowns all night and learn from a win, not another loss.

    This team should come out to a half filled Husky Stadium filled with tan and moss green Eddie Bauer clothing and curb stomp Oregon.

    Time for Browning to make the plays

    Kids all over America throw bombs in backyards and sandlots from the time they're old enough to pick up a football. How can a college QB consistently miss on so many open deep balls? Especially where the WRs clearly beat the DBs?

    Good Christ.
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    he'll hit them, i think

    they clearly trust him, if Miles is the QB they run on that 3rd and 5 to seal it. Gutsy call.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    It is a little worrisome how bad Browning has been the past two games.
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    we all know browning needs to develop, what can't be stated enough is how steady he is. USC in the Coliseum at night on ESPN is a pretty bigtime environment for a 19yo from CA.

    he is the opposite of Miley in that he doesn't hyperventilate, doesn't get overwhelmed by the minutia nor the moment, and you can tell the coaches trust him.

    now we see if he develops, but I think he can only get better, especially if we can get Gaskin running for 130 yards a game.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    I think you are selling him a bit short ...

    Success rate for young QBs making first conference start on the the road isn't good.

    In an ideal world there would have been a veteran QB to let him RS. He didn't so learning curve will be steep at times.
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    So Browning is the whipping boy this week? What happened to Petersen & Smith? It's hard to keep up with the whining bitches.
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    the choosen one (rosen) and browning are essentially having identical years. it's what you get from tru frosh qbs

    http://espn.go.com/college-football/conferences/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/collegeQuarterbackRating/year/2015/id/9/pac-12-conference
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,334
    BlowItUp said:

    the choosen one (rosen) and browning are essentially having identical years. it's what you get from tru frosh qbs

    http://espn.go.com/college-football/conferences/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/collegeQuarterbackRating/year/2015/id/9/pac-12-conference

    Browning has double the sacks and half the TD passes. But yes, other than having totally different statistical years - they are kind of similar.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited October 2015

    HuskyInAZ said:

    So Browning is the whipping boy this week? What happened to Petersen & Smith? It's hard to keep up with the whining bitches.

    I've dooged it up about Victor and the defense a lot, said the play calling was better, and the OL was better but you never comment or point that out. Any criticism whether it is accurate or over the top and you become a giant cunt.

    Can we talk football here and comment on the game? Browning was bad. That's a fact, jack. 16-32 for 137 with multiple missed throws when guys were wide open. Fuck us for commenting on it. You blame us for being miserable and insufferable, but it's like we aren't allowed to enjoy the win in your eyes because not every comment is positive and filled with caveats about being too young, exectuation, blah, blah. Why did you ever leave dawgman if all you want is positive, filler, bs opinions? Maybe you didn't.

    Not all of us are simpleton's like you and enjoy giving opinions and analysis on the game.
    This.

    Precisely why I left the other site (along with getting banned for encouraging people should leave and telling eklund he should be selling insurance in Alaska).
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited October 2015
    HuskyInAZ said:

    So Browning is the whipping boy this week? What happened to Petersen & Smith? It's hard to keep up with the whining bitches.

    We're actually giving credit to smith this week, you should be happy. He put the players in the right situations to succeed last night, finally
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    All this Nega-Dawg energy is really bringing @HuskyInAZ down.

    PTSD, shell shock, Ty-bot, #Bark4Sark, whatever you want to call it.

    Give the dumb fuck a break before he angrily PMs Derek.
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994

    In what universe would two games where a QB goes 33-60 for 289, 0 TD's and 3 picks get praise? If the subject is Browning, how should we comment on it @HuskyInAZ?

    I agree with you. I come out of this with, he's going to get this dialed in...matter of faith. The inverse is, he sucks and will not improve. That might be where we differ
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    HuskyInAZ said:

    So Browning is the whipping boy this week? What happened to Petersen & Smith? It's hard to keep up with the whining bitches.

    He deserves criticism but it's the up and down nature of the board that gets to me sometimes. After Utah State, he was the savior. There was some meme or gif of him with sunglasses. Maybe some people have been consistent. I can't keep track of all of the fucktards here. I don't even remember what thread I was on 15 minutes ago.
    Good poonts but I'm pretty sure the Cobra memes were sarkastic.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Passion said:

    That is the best news for Browning. He can get in the film room and see where he had touchdowns all night and learn from a win, not another loss.

    This team should come out to a half filled Husky Stadium filled with tan and moss green Eddie Bauer clothing and curb stomp Oregon.

    Time for Browning to make the plays

    Kids all over America throw bombs in backyards and sandlots from the time they're old enough to pick up a football. How can a college QB consistently miss on so many open deep balls? Especially where the WRs clearly beat the DBs?

    Good Christ.

    I'm not sure you're in touch with America's youth anymore. Either your dad is a coach and you are a QB or you are that annoying kid that wants to challenge the QB.

    Kids don't just go play shit anymore.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited October 2015
    EwaDawg said:

    BlowItUp said:

    the choosen one (rosen) and browning are essentially having identical years. it's what you get from tru frosh qbs

    http://espn.go.com/college-football/conferences/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/collegeQuarterbackRating/year/2015/id/9/pac-12-conference

    Browning has double the sacks and half the TD passes. But yes, other than having totally different statistical years - they are kind of similar.
    And Rosen was put into a slightly better position to succeed with the respective supporting casts. The sack and td statistics emphasize that point pretty well- they are completing about the same number of passes for about the same number of yards and they've been burned on an equal number of mistakes so why the stark difference in TDs and sacks? OL, Paul Perkins, WRs.

    Going forward the yards per attempt is most predictive. But obviously neither will succeed in the long run if they don't continually improve.
  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,216 Standard Supporter
    Once he settled down, Browning looked a little better. He had Locker face to start the game.

    Not having a deep threat like Ross is hurting is too. Ross might've gotten those over throws.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Once he settled down, Browning looked a little better. He had Locker face to start the game.

    Not having a deep threat like Ross is hurting is too. Ross might've gotten those over throws.

    He had 3 WRs beat their man deep, and he couldn't hit them. A deep threat doesn't change that.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    edited October 2015

    Once he settled down, Browning looked a little better. He had Locker face to start the game.

    Not having a deep threat like Ross is hurting is too. Ross might've gotten those over throws.

    He had 3 WRs beat their man deep, and he couldn't hit them. A deep threat doesn't change that.
    The mere fact "we" took those shots down field were important.

    Guess we all know the answer to why those shots weren't being taken earlier in the year.

    I hope to hell "we" don't go back to not throwing. Browning will never hit those passes if he stops throwing deep.

    There was one at the end the TE actually had ... but a good follow through by the defender knocked it out of his hands.

    The kid is young, he was clearly shell shocked.

    I'm excited for the win and even more excited to start pissing purple and shitting gold.